Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Type-A Hecke Specht modules are in the same block iff their labels have the same e-core

Statement

Let F be a field and q∈F× with quantum characteristic e (The quantum characteristic of an invertible Hecke parameter), and let Sλ be the type-A Hecke Specht module of this page in the Dipper-James convention (The type-A Hecke Specht module and its cell form) for λ⊢n. Then for all partitions λ,μ⊢n the modules Sλ and Sμ lie in the same block of HF,q(Sn) if and only if λ and μ have the same e-core (The e-core, the e-quotient, and the e-weight). Equivalently, for finite e, the blocks of HF,q(Sn) are indexed by the e-cores γ of size at most n with ∣γ∣≡n(mode), and the block of Sλ is determined by Ce(λ). For e=∞ use C∞(λ):=λ; the Hecke algebra is semisimple and its blocks are indexed by partitions of n.

No choice principle is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F, q∈F× with quantum characteristic e, an integer n≥0, the Hecke algebra H=HF,q(Sn) with Specht modules Sλ for λ⊢n, and a fixed integer d≥n.

[F1]

For d≥n, the Schur idempotent e∈S=SF(d,n) satisfies eSe≅H, and X↦Xe is exact. It sends each Weyl module Wλ to the nonzero Murphy cell module SMλ; its simple images are zero or the Murphy simple modules, with the nonzero images indexed by the e-restricted partitions (The Schur idempotent and the Schur functor for type-A q-Schur algebras, The Schur functor sends Weyl and simple modules to Specht and Hecke simple modules).

[F2]

Blocks: 1=∑DδD is the unique decomposition of the identity of a finite-dimensional algebra into pairwise orthogonal primitive central idempotents, blocks are the ideals cut out by the δD, and every nonzero central idempotent is a sum of some of the δD (Blocks of a finite-dimensional algebra via primitive central idempotents, The identity of a finite-dimensional algebra decomposes into primitive central idempotents, Decompositions of the identity into primitive central idempotents are unique).

[F3]

The q-Schur algebra and its Weyl modules: S is finite-dimensional, S=EndH(M) for M=⨁ν∈Λ(d,n)Mν with M(1n)=H, and WFλ has head LFλ (The type-A q-Schur algebra and its Weyl modules).

[F4]

The q-Schur block theorem q-Schur Weyl modules are in the same block iff their labels have the same e-core: for λ,μ⊢n, the Weyl modules WFλ,WFμ lie in the same block of S if and only if Ce(λ)=Ce(μ); the blocks of S are indexed by the e-cores γ with ∣γ∣≤n, ∣γ∣≡n(mode); and if e=∞ then S is semisimple with each WFλ its own block.

[F5]

The accepted ordinary/Murphy dictionary identifies the ordinary Specht module with the fixed θ pullback of the conjugate-shape Murphy cell module. Conjugation sends Ce(λ) to Ce(λ)′, and sends restricted labels to regular labels. In particular it preserves equality of cores. An algebra automorphism permutes primitive central idempotents and therefore preserves the same-block relation (The type-A Hecke Specht module and its cell form).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3

Central idempotents of H from blocks of S. For a block C of S with primitive central idempotent ϵC put ϵ~C:=ϵCe=eϵCe∈H. This element is a central idempotent of H: it is idempotent because ϵC is, and for x=ese∈H centrality of ϵC gives xϵ~C=esϵCe=eϵCse=ϵ~Cx; it is nonzero because it acts as the identity on the nonzero module WFλe=SMλ for any λ with WFλ∈C, namely SMλϵ~C=WFλeϵCe=WFλϵCe=SMλ. Moreover ϵ~Cϵ~C′=eϵCϵC′e=0 for C≠C′ and ∑Cϵ~C=e∑CϵCe=e2=1H.

1.2F2F3algebra

Number of q-Schur blocks is at least the number of Hecke blocks. Let H=⨁iBi be the block decomposition of H with block identities bi. Since M=⨁νMν and H=M(1n) is a direct summand, M=⨁iMbi with each Mbi≠0 (it contains Hbi=Bi), and HomH(Mbi,Mbj)=0 for i≠j, because a map f satisfies f(x)=f(xbi)=f(x)bi∈Mbjbi=0. Hence S=EndH(M)=⨁i,jHomH(Mbi,Mbj)=∏iEndH(Mbi) is a product of the nonzero algebras EndH(Mbi), and a product of nonzero algebras has at least one block per factor; so #{blocks of S}≥#{blocks of H}.

2.1F2step 1.1

Number of Hecke blocks is at least the number of q-Schur blocks. Decompose each nonzero central idempotent ϵ~C of step 1.1 into primitive central idempotents of H using the unique decomposition of 1H: every primitive central idempotent δD of H with δDϵ~C=δD belongs to exactly one ϵ~C, because δD=δD⋅1H=∑CδDϵ~C and pairwise orthogonality of the δD forces δDϵ~C∈{0,δD}. Since each ϵ~C≠0 has at least one such δD, the blocks D of H are partitioned into nonempty supports over the blocks C of S, and therefore #{blocks of H}≥#{blocks of S}.

3.1F1F4step 2.1step 1.2

A bijection of block sets, and the core criterion. By steps 2.1 and 1.2 the two block counts are equal, so each ϵ~C of step 1.1 has exactly one primitive summand and the map C↦ϵ~C is a bijection from the blocks of S onto the blocks of H. Since SMλ=WFλe and SMμ=WFμe, the modules SMλ and SMμ lie in the same Hecke block if and only if WFλ and WFμ lie in the same q-Schur block: indeed the block of SMλ is the image under the bijection of the block of WFλ. By the block theorem [F4] the latter holds if and only if Ce(λ)=Ce(μ), which proves the q-Schur-normalised statement.

4.1F1F4F5step 3.1algebra∎

Ordinary normalisation and semisimplicity. By [F5], Sλ and Sμ lie in the same block exactly when SMλ′ and SMμ′ do. Step 3.1 makes this equivalent to Ce(λ′)=Ce(μ′), and the identity Ce(ν′)=Ce(ν)′ makes it equivalent to Ce(λ)=Ce(μ). This identity follows by conjugating every removable border strip in a core-removal sequence; the terminal core also conjugates, by independence of removal order. For e=∞, S is semisimple by [F4]. Its corner eSe is semisimple: by Wedderburn–Artin theorem for semisimple rings, in the Wedderburn decomposition of S, each idempotent selects a subspace in each matrix factor, and its corner is a product of matrix algebras over the same division rings. Thus H≅eSe is semisimple; the block bijection separates the partition labels. This proves all assertions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources