How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Murphy cells are the same-shape contragredient Specht duals
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, and , and let with its basis , , the permutation form on and the DJ form on be as in Hecke row permutation modules and ordinary Dipper-James polytabloids, The Murphy cellular basis, the cell law and the Murphy form and Integral polytabloid straightening for the comparison. Then:
-
Setting for and defines an explicit -bilinear pairing that is -balanced, , and whose adjoint is an isomorphism of right -modules onto the star-contragredient module of The Hecke sign automorphism, pullback and contragredient dual. No nondegeneracy of the DJ form is required.
-
Equivalently, the kernel of the quotient map is the orthogonal complement , namely ; the pairing matrices in the bases and have entries with , and determinant a unit of . Their inverses are finite tableau formulas given by the adjugate divided by this unit.
-
All statements are compatible with every base change , ; the construction uses no generic semisimplicity, no nondegeneracy of and no choice principle.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , , a partition , the Hecke algebra with its standard basis, star anti-involution, the modules , the distinguished basis of and the permutation form , the Murphy basis , the dominance ideal , the cell module with basis and the Murphy form .
The trace , , satisfies and for standard basis elements , ; the bilinear form has unit diagonal in the standard basis (The Murphy cellular basis, the cell law and the Murphy form, Proof step 1.3).
is free on , , and is -contravariant; is free on and a split direct summand of (The row permutation module: distinguished basis and Hecke action, The permutation form is H-contravariant and restricts to the DJ form, Integral polytabloid straightening for the comparison).
, is the kernel of the quotient, is spanned by the Murphy elements with , and is an -basis of the cell module (The Murphy cellular basis, the cell law and the Murphy form).
whenever for some (Row symmetrizers and signed column symmetrizers vanish outside dominance).
The star-contragredient of a right -module is a right -module via ; for finite free it is finite free of the same rank and commutes with base change (The Hecke sign automorphism, pullback and contragredient dual).
Proof
The correctly scaled universal trace formula. Work first over , using as the formal parameter. For , length additivity gives , and [F1] gives when , while , where . By bilinearity, The factor is essential; it is not generally a unit and can vanish after specialization. It is nonzero in the domain , since its constant coefficient is .
Orthogonality before specialization. Put and . For a higher Murphy element with , its product with after star is because by [F4]. The outer factor multiplies a zero vector; no factor is silently discarded. Expand in the higher Murphy basis using [F3]. Then and step 1.1 gives . Cancel this nonzero polynomial only in the universal domain , proving . The quotient and its kernel in [F3] are base-change compatible: the quotient is free on the supplied standard basis, its kernel is the split kernel of that quotient, and the independent Murphy construction identifies its specialization with . Thus tensoring the zero pairing identity gives for every and unit . No cancellation is performed in , including when .
The descended pairing is perfect. Define ; step 2.1 proves this is well defined. Contravariance gives , so its adjoint is an -homomorphism by [F5]. The map , , is an isomorphism with unit diagonal . Compose this map itself with restriction , which is onto because is split in . The resulting surjection kills and therefore factors onto . Both are free of rank . Choosing preimages of their finitely many basis vectors gives a right inverse of its square matrix; the determinant is a unit, so the adjoint is an isomorphism. This proves clause 1 without any nondegeneracy of the DJ self-form.
Kernel, finite formulas and every base change. The kernel of is by its definition. Since the factored adjoint is an isomorphism, this is exactly . Write with the finite Laurent-polynomial coefficients of the integral polytabloid basis. Then . Compute these coefficients by the finite signed-symmetrizer expansion and standard-basis multiplication; the inverse pairing matrix is . Over its determinant is a Laurent unit by step 3.1, so both the pairing and its inverse specialize to every , retaining perfectness and the kernel identity. Empty shapes have the rank-one pairing . No generic semisimplicity, nondegeneracy of the DJ self-form, division by a specialized Poincaré polynomial or choice principle is used.
Depends on
- Hecke row permutation modules and ordinary Dipper-James polytabloids
- The Hecke sign automorphism, pullback and contragredient dual
- The permutation form is H-contravariant and restricts to the DJ form
- The Murphy cellular basis, the cell law and the Murphy form
- Integral polytabloid straightening for the comparison
- Row symmetrizers and signed column symmetrizers vanish outside dominance
- The row permutation module: distinguished basis and Hecke action
Used by
- Polytabloid specialization and the exact signed multiplicity dictionary Corollary
- Untwisted conjugation changes the module Counterexample
- The graded Specht module by homogeneous standard tableaux Definition
- The type-A Hecke Specht module and its cell form Definition
- The two-tableau pairing at a singular parameter Example
- Type-A Hecke permutation modules: semistandard Murphy bases and Specht filtrations Lemma
- Normal-node composition multiplicities under residue restriction Theorem
- Ordinary Specht modules are the signed conjugate Murphy cells Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Mathas, Iwahori-Hecke algebras and Schur algebras of the symmetric group, author-hosted prepublication manuscript, 79 PDF pages (standard reference, not scraped)
- Steen Ryom-Hansen, On the denominators of Young's seminormal basis, arXiv:0904.4243v5, 28 PDF pages (standard reference, not scraped)