Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The spatial recentering action is jointly measurable

Statement

The map (x,μ)↦θxμ from Rd times the evaluation-measurable space of locally finite counting measures to that space is measurable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The evaluation sigma-algebra on locally finite counting measures and the recentering convention in Recentering a point configuration at a spatial location.

[F1]

A point process is a measurable random element into locally finite counting measures, and their sigma-algebra is generated by evaluations μ↦μ(B) for Borel B. (Random measures and locally finite point processes)

[F2]

A measure kernel has measurable evaluations, and parameterized integration of a nonnegative product-measurable function is measurable when the kernel has a common finite-mass exhaustion. (Measure kernel and probability kernel, Measurability of integration against a kernel)

[A1]

AC and Countable Choice are carried by the transitive well-definedness dependencies of the point-process supplier; the evaluation calculation below uses neither. (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

Proof

Given: d≥1, AC, Countable Choice, and a locally finite counting measure μ with its evaluation sigma-algebra.

1.1givenF1F2construct

Fix a Borel set B⊆Rd. On parameter space Rd×Nlf(Rd) define the evaluation kernel K((x,μ),C)=μ(C). Its evaluations are measurable by [F1]; the fixed compact exhaustion [−n,n]d has finite K((x,μ),⋅)-mass for every (x,μ) by local finiteness. The function ((x,μ),y)↦1B(y−x) is product measurable because subtraction is continuous and B is Borel.

2.1step 1.1F1F2

Applying [F2] to this kernel gives measurability of (x,μ)⟼∫1B(y−x) μ(dy)=μ(B+x)=(θxμ)(B). Since this holds for every Borel B and evaluations generate the target sigma-algebra [F1], (x,μ)↦θxμ is measurable.

3.1A1step 2.1∎

The argument applies to every Borel evaluation and uses no selection; the AC and Countable Choice tags record only the carried supplier conventions [A1].

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Recentering a point configuration at a spatial location.

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources