How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ripley K for a homogeneous Poisson process is Euclidean ball volume
Statement
Assume AC and Countable Choice as carried by the point-process supplier. Let be a stationary homogeneous Poisson point process on with intensity measure , where . For every ,
The full Palm law is ; adding and then deleting the distinguished atom means one occurrence, so no simplicity assumption is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, Countable Choice, the stationary homogeneous Poisson process , its full Palm law, and the closed ball convention.
AC is carried by the transitive point-process supplier dependencies; this proof adds no choice. (The Axiom of Choice)
Countable Choice is carried by the point-process and Lebesgue-measure supplier dependencies. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
The deletion-form Mecke identity holds for every nonnegative product-measurable integrand and removes one counted occurrence. (Mecke identity for locally finite Poisson point processes)
The full Palm law satisfies the refined Campbell identity. (Existence and uniqueness of the full Palm law and the refined Campbell identity)
Recentering is , is jointly measurable, and sends to . (Recentering a point configuration at a spatial location, The spatial recentering action is jointly measurable)
for the closed ball. (Pair-correlation density and Ripley K-function)
For every compact , the Poisson count has parameter and second moment . (Poisson and Cox point processes, Normalization, moments, and generating function of the Poisson count law)
Proof
Given: AC, Countable Choice, a stationary homogeneous Poisson process of intensity , and its full Palm law .
For each compact , [F6] gives , so is locally square integrable and satisfies the second-order premise of the K definition [F5].
Fix a configuration event . In [F1] use which is product measurable by [F3] and the evaluation formula for adding one atom. At each occurrence of , deletion followed by addition restores , so the left side is .
The right side of that Mecke identity is because and stationarity gives . The refined Palm identity [F2] applied to says that the left side in step 1.2 is . Since and , for every , proving the full-Palm law identity.
Under this Palm law, has the distribution of . Removing the single distinguished occurrence gives even if has other occurrences at . Therefore by [F4]. Substituting in the K definition [F5] yields .
The endpoint is included: the closed ball is and the same calculation gives . The proof uses the one-occurrence deletion convention and asserts neither diffuse-intensity simplicity nor any other simplicity property. AC and Countable Choice [A1]–[A2] are inherited supplier assumptions.
Sources
Last and Penrose, Chapters 4 and 9, Mecke equation and Theorem 9.4; Baddeley, Lecture 3, Example 3.3. The local proof derives the full Palm law directly from Mecke.
Depends on
- Pair-correlation density and Ripley K-function
- The full Palm distribution defined by the refined Campbell identity
- Existence and uniqueness of the full Palm law and the refined Campbell identity
- Recentering a point configuration at a spatial location
- The spatial recentering action is jointly measurable
- Stationarity, finite intensity, and spatial ergodicity
- A stationary point process of finite intensity has mean measure rho times Lebesgue measure
- Poisson and Cox point processes
- Mecke identity for locally finite Poisson point processes
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Normalization, moments, and generating function of the Poisson count law
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Günter Last and Mathew Penrose, Lectures on the Poisson Process (2017 author-hosted version) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Adrian Baddeley, Spatial Point Processes and their Applications (standard reference, not scraped)