Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kernel composition is well defined and associative

Statement

The composition KL of probability kernels K:ST and L:TU is a probability kernel SU. If M:UV is another probability kernel, then (KL)M=K(LM) at every source point and every measurable subset of V. Equality concerns the specified kernels, not unspecified almost-everywhere classes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and conventions in the statement.

[F1]

The composition candidate is the integral of the second kernel evaluation. Composition of probability kernels.

[F2]

Integrating a nonnegative jointly measurable function against a probability kernel is measurable. Measurability of integration against a kernel.

[F3]

An increasing sequence of nonnegative measurable functions passes through each integral. Monotone convergence for the integral.

[F4]

Nonnegative measurable functions admit increasing simple approximations. Every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of simple measurable functions.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For each measurable AU, the function L(,A) is measurable and between zero and one. Its lift to S×T is product-measurable because inverse images are rectangles with first factor S. The integration theorem therefore gives measurable source evaluations of KL. For a fixed s, (KL)(s,)=0 and (KL)(s,U)=1dK(s,)=1. If (Aj)jN are disjoint measurable subsets of U, then L(t,jNAj)=limNj=0NL(t,Aj), an increasing limit. Monotone convergence and finite additivity of the integral yield (KL)(s,jAj)=j(KL)(s,Aj). Hence each source section is a probability measure.

F1F2F3
2.1

Fix s. For every nonnegative measurable h:U[0,], Uh(u)(KL)(s,du)=T(Uh(u)L(t,du))K(s,dt). For h=1_A this is exactly the definition. Finite nonnegative linear combinations establish it for simple h. For increasing simple h_n converging to h, monotone convergence first under each L(t,·), then under K(s,·), and also under (KL)(s,·), proves the identity. The inner integrals are measurable by the integration theorem, so every displayed integral is defined. This is an iterated-kernel identity proved locally; it is not an application of product-measure Fubini to a varying measure.

step 1.1F1F2F3F4
3.1

For AV measurable take the bounded measurable function h(u)=M(u,A) in step 2.1. Its left side is ((KL)M)(s,A), while its right side is T(LM)(t,A)K(s,dt)=(K(LM))(s,A). Step 1.1 also ensures LM is a probability kernel, so both compositions are defined. This proves the asserted pointwise equality for every s and A. When A is empty both sides are zero; when A=V both are one. For an empty source equality is vacuous. If an intermediate target is empty while its source is nonempty, the hypothesized probability kernel cannot exist; no measure of mass one on the empty set is used. The proof requires no AC.

step 1.1step 2.1F1

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Composition of probability kernels.

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources