How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Signed local cancellation models for the Khovanov Reidemeister moves
Statement
The integral signed Khovanov cubes have the local graded cancellation models described below. They are chain homotopy equivalences over every fixed exterior resolution, commute with exterior saddle differentials, and commute with multiplication by at every marked point outside the local disk. Consequently they also give chain homotopy equivalences after taking the reduced quotient. For the crossing with A-smoothing the identity matching and B-smoothing the cap-cup matching, the two three-crossing braid cubes with words and retract to the same three-term complex. The two-crossing inverse-pair cube retracts to the identity matching in local cohomological degree one and quantum shift upward by one. All retractions are integral; their homotopies and the two cancellations in the three-crossing cube are specified in the proof.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The algebra , its Frobenius maps, and cube signs , with local crossings ordered before exterior crossings.
The Frobenius maps and their basis values are those of Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions. The corresponding signed cubes square to zero by The Khovanov cube differential squares to zero.
In the reduced quotient the distinguished component has module , with , , and (Reduced Khovanov cohomology of a knot).
Proof
Meaning of every local map. Use rectangles with top boundary points and bottom boundary points , both listed left to right. Let join to . Let join top to , bottom to , and all other to . In a product , is above and equal middle labels are joined. Thus is with one disjoint middle circle, and is boundary-fixing planar isotopic to ; likewise with interchanged. For the latter assertion, trace top to one cap, bottom to one cup, and top to bottom along the remaining arc; there is no closed component. Contracting the intervening bends gives the stated isotopy. Close any of these matchings by a fixed exterior resolution. Order the resulting circle factors by the least arc label on each circle, using a fixed total order on all local and exterior arcs; factor permutations have no Koszul signs. A dot on an arc means multiplication by on the circle containing that arc. A saddle replacing an occurrence of by , or conversely, means precisely on the two ordered circle factors if they merge, and if they split, followed by the indicated factor permutation. All unmentioned factors have the identity map. This defines the maps below on every tensor basis , even when several local arcs belong to the same global circle. In the based case use for the distinguished factor and [F2] for a saddle meeting it.
Circle coordinates and neck cutting. For a disjoint middle circle put its factor first and write . If a saddle splits that circle from an arc carrying dot operator , its map in these coordinates is ; if it merges the circle into an arc carrying dot operator , its map is . These follow from and . Two successive opposite saddles between the same two local arcs equal the sum of a dot on each arc. If the arcs are on distinct circles, this is the identity : on , both sides are . If they are on one circle it is . The same formulas with the distinguished factor reduced modulo prove the assertion in that case too. These are the exact tensor interpretations of the local neck-cutting identities, including when two dot positions are on the same circle.
An explicit cancellation rule. Suppose a differential between consecutive degrees has block matrix , with an isomorphism. Set and . These invertible integral changes of coordinates give . Conjugate the adjacent differentials too. The equation and invertibility of imply that the incoming differential has zero coordinate and the outgoing differential vanishes on . Thus there is a direct summand , contracted by , elsewhere. Inclusion and projection of the remaining coordinates, conjugated by , are chain maps with and . This supplies actual chain maps and a homotopy for every cancellation used below, rather than merely an acyclicity assertion. If the blocks are homogeneous, these maps have quantum degree zero and has cohomological degree .
RII: all four modules and signs. Take two strands and order the crossing with states first, the opposite crossing with states second. The four states are , , with a middle circle, and , respectively. The local differential is where and are the two saddles, is the dot on the arc from which the middle circle splits, and is the dot on the arc into which it merges. Here ; the minus signs on the edge are exactly the cube sign for the second crossing. Step 2.1 gives , so these displayed differentials square to zero. Define with zero in other local degrees, and define Then , , and . In degree zero , in degree two , and in degree one sends to , which is exactly . The surviving has local degree one and quantum grading increased by one; in the shift conventions of the question this is . Thus both acyclic pairs and the signed quotient are explicitly identified. The other crossing order follows by swapping the two cube coordinates with state sign .
RIII: ordered states and the first cancellation. Let each crossing have states , and form the word from top to bottom, with crossings ordered in that order. Write and . In degrees the ordered states are In the last term use the boundary-fixing isotopy of step 1.1. Denote a degree-one element by and the circle coordinates in state by . Introduce four precisely located saddles: inserts below , inserts above , inserts above , and inserts below . Let and be the dot operators on the bottom cup and top cap of , respectively. The degree-one differential is with output coordinates . Indeed the six cube edges are with sign , with sign , with sign , with sign , with sign , and with sign . The two edges to split the middle circle from the bottom cup or top cap, giving exactly the two displayed circle-coordinate pairs by step 2.1. The edge has sign and merges that middle circle into the remaining through arc of . Its component is therefore , with its component minus the dot on that through arc. Cancel this component by step 2.2. There are no remaining degree-three terms; the differential into is the corresponding projection of the displayed .
The second cancellation and the common residual matrix. In the resulting complex, the component is . Cancel it by step 2.2: its row is , so the residual coordinate substitution is . The retained degree-one coordinates are , the retained degree-two coordinates are , and the differentials become where is the saddle inserting . The first map is obtained from the original by deleting the canceled coordinate; it is compatible with . Repeat both cancellations for with and interchanged. Its retained coordinates before reordering are and , with matrix . Swapping both pairs, without a sign, gives exactly the preceding matrix and the preceding . The four entries refer to the same saddles on the same labelled boundary matchings: for instance inserts above, and inserts below, on both sides. Hence these are actual equal tensor maps by step 1.1, not identifications of unlabelled spaces. Their kernels, composites and signs need no further identities. Composing the two explicit cancellation maps and their inverses gives the RIII equivalence; the homotopy for a composite of retractions and is .
Quantum degrees. A state of local height has quantum degree increased by . In RII, has the underlying grading of increased by two, has the grading of , and has the grading of increased by two. Thus both canceled isomorphisms and the maps of step 3.1 preserve quantum degree. In RIII, and both have the grading of increased by three; and both have the grading of increased by one. The common residual complex has quantum increases in its three degrees. Every change of coordinates in step 2.2 is therefore homogeneous.
Exterior differentials and the marked quotient. Dots commute with every exterior saddle: and . Two saddles in disjoint local disks commute before cube signs, including when their participating arcs lie on a common global circle, by associativity, coassociativity and the Frobenius identity in [F1]. A middle circle being delooped is contained in the local disk, so no exterior saddle meets it. Boundary-fixing isotopies of the matchings preserve the labelled exterior arcs. All matrix changes, inverses of blocks, projections, inclusions and contractions above therefore commute with unsigned exterior saddles and with at a fixed exterior marked point. The total differential, with local crossings first, is on local degree . A local homotopy lowers by one, so its two exterior terms in cancel; local degree-zero maps commute with the signed total differential. These identities prove the same retractions for the total cube. The identities descend modulo because every map and every homotopy commutes with ; this argument does not assume that every local saddle acts trivially on the distinguished interval. It proves all assertions, integrally and choice-free.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bar-Natan, On Khovanov's categorification of the Jones polynomial, §§3.5.2–3.5.5, printed pp. 347–350 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Khovanov, A categorification of the Jones polynomial, §§5 and 8.1–8.4, especially Proposition 38 (standard reference, not scraped)