Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Khovanov homology and Jones categorification

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Cut tangles of marked knots have relative Reidemeister movies

Statement

Assume countable choice. Let (D,p) and (D′,p′) be finite regular diagrams of the same oriented smooth knot, with marks away from crossings. Remove a small open arc about each mark and regard each complementary diagram as a one-interval tangle diagram in a disk, using the complementary disk in the projection sphere. Identify their two boundary endpoints and short oriented product collars. The resulting proper arcs can be realized in one standard smooth three-ball so that they are smoothly isotopic with those endpoints and collars fixed. Their diagrams are connected by a finite sequence of planar isotopies and oriented Reidemeister moves supported away from those collars. This holds when the two diagrams coincide and only the mark has moved along the knot.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω and the two finite based diagrams of the same oriented knot.

[F1]

A smooth isotopy of embeddings of a compact manifold, including a compact three-ball, extends under ACω to an ambient isotopy; end stationarity can be retained (The isotopy extension theorem, clauses 1 and 4).

[F2]

Parametric transversality and transverse preimages have the meanings and countable-choice hypotheses of Parametric transversality and The transverse preimage theorem. The finite-jet proof, codimension counts, exclusion of accumulation on source diagonals, and construction of planar isotopies on regular intervals are given in General-position isotopies of links, proof steps 1.1–5.1.

[F3]

An ordinary cusp, quadratic double tangency and transverse triple event give respectively R1, R2 and R3, with all actual orientations and height orders retained (Generic isotopies have only Reidemeister singular times, proof steps 1.1–2.1; Oriented Reidemeister moves).

Proof

1.1givenconstruct

The endpoint realizations and the common cap. Regard a planar diagram as a diagram on the projection sphere, and choose a small closed disk U about its mark meeting the diagram in one crossing-free arc only. The complementary disk contains a proper interval diagram; its two endpoints can be put at any prescribed two boundary points by an orientation-preserving disk coordinate change, preserving the interval orientation. Realize its crossings at small distinct positive or negative heights in a thickening of that disk, and straighten short end collars. Round the thickening to a standard three-ball B. Closing the interval by a fixed unknotted arc in the complementary ball B∗ gives exactly the original diagram on the sphere: the two projected disks glue along their boundary and the cap is the single deleted arc. This operation changes no crossing, sign, or resolution; it replaces the marked circle in every resolution by one interval. Make these choices for both diagrams with the same B,B∗, endpoints and cap J. The cap and slightly longer knot collars may be chosen identical as parametrized embeddings at both ends. Indeed an orientation-preserving change of circle parametrization can prescribe its parametrization on an interval; it extends over the remaining interval by a strictly increasing smooth map. Such circle reparametrizations are isotopic to the identity, as seen by interpolating their increasing lifts f:R→R, f(x+1)=f(x)+1, with the identity lift. Thus there is a smooth isotopy Ft of the closed parametrized knots with these endpoint embeddings and this common source interval J. Reparametrize time to make it stationary near 0,1. Here the existence of Ft is exactly the hypothesis that the two closed diagrams represent the same oriented knot.

2.1F1step 1.1construct

Trivialize a moving ball, including its endpoint charts. Along the track of the slightly enlarged source interval J, choose a smooth pair of normal vectors to the nonzero knot tangent, equal to the same standard pair near t=0,1. Such a pair exists on the rectangle J×I: start with local transverse frames, extend them along the interval and then in time, and correct their terminal angle by a smooth rotation, equal to zero initially and to that angle terminally. The terminal angle has a smooth real lift on an interval. Regarding S3 as the unit sphere in R4, use the explicit tube (Ft(s)+un1(s,t)+vn2(s,t))/1+u2+v2, with the two normals tangent to S3. Its derivative is injective along the zero section. For uniformly small transverse coordinates it is an embedded tube; compactness gives a common width and excludes intersections with the rest of the knot outside the enlarged interval. Rounded end caps give a smooth family of embedded three-balls bt:B∗→S3 about the cap, intersecting the knot in the chosen cap and its standard end collars. At the two stationary ends this family is the same specified ball chart: b0=b1. Apply [F1] to bt and, if necessary, a slightly larger ball chart, to get Ht with Htb0=bt. Then Gt=Ht−1Ft fixes the cap and its collar throughout. Its restriction to the complementary source interval is a proper-arc isotopy in the fixed B=S3∖Int⁡B∗. At t=0 it is the first tangle; at t=1 it is h applied to the second, where h=H1−1∣B is a diffeomorphism equal to the identity on a boundary collar, because b1=b0 on the slightly larger ball. No identification of the terminal ball chart with an arbitrary initial chart has been assumed.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1construct

Correct the terminal diffeomorphism on the arc. Identify B with the unit ball and choose the coordinate origin off the second compact arc T. The chart can have this property by a small interior change fixing its boundary collar. Since h is the identity near the boundary, for 0<r≤1 the maps hr(x)={rh(x/r),∣x∣≤r,x,∣x∣≥r are smooth diffeomorphisms, agreeing smoothly at ∣x∣=r, and equal to the identity on a fixed boundary collar. Put h0=1. For r less than the positive distance from the origin to T, hr∣T is exactly the identity. Thus (s,r)↦hr(T(s)) is a smooth isotopy of proper arcs even at r=0, although the ambient Alexander formula need not be smooth at (x,r)=(0,0). Each slice is embedded, its endpoints and collars are fixed, and its final slice is h(T). Reverse this arc isotopy and concatenate it with step 2.1, using stationary time changes at the join. The resulting smooth arc isotopy runs from the first tangle to the second relative to the same boundary endpoints and collars. This argument uses no claim that the diffeomorphism group of a three-ball is smoothly contractible.

4.1F2step 3.1construct

Projection and relative perturbations. Choose the standard ball model as a rounded thickening of the projection disk, with the two fixed endpoint collars radial in that disk and with constant height. The rest of the compact arc track is in the interior of the ball. Shorten the protected collars if needed. Compactness then separates their projected endpoint neighbourhoods from every other branch: off a slightly larger source collar the radial coordinate in the disk is uniformly bounded away from its boundary. On the remaining transition collars the projection is still a fixed regular embedded arc. Reparametrize the isotopy in time to be stationary near its two regular end diagrams. In the finite-dimensional family of [F2], replace the time cutoff λ(t) by λ(t)ρ(s), where ρ vanishes on the protected source collars and is positive on their complement. Embed the compact source rectangle in Euclidean space; multiplying coordinate polynomials of degree at most 43 by this cutoff independently prescribes jets through order three at any at most six distinct free source points. Explicitly, at points Xi, the polynomials ∏j≠i∣X−Xj∣8 times suitable cubic Taylor polynomials prescribe the required jets, since multiplication by the nonzero cutoff is invertible on jets. Keep the spatial height coordinate unchanged. Small parameters preserve slice embeddings by compact local immersion and distant-point separation, fix the time-end diagrams, and fix the protected endpoint collars. The collars meet no singular stratum, and the transition region is regular with no other projected branch, so absence of perturbations on the collars loses no needed transversality.

5.1F2step 4.1algebraconstruct

All singularities remain interior and finite. Apply [F2] to that family on the free source configurations. The equations gs=0 have codimension two in (s,t); the extra degeneracy det⁡(gss,gsss)=0 has total codimension three and is avoided. Distinct-point equality has codimension two in (s1,s2,t); equality plus tangent dependence has codimension three, giving isolated quadratic double tangencies with nonzero relative normal velocity. Triple equality has codimension four in (s1,s2,s3,t); adding tangent dependence or a vanishing derivative increases codimension and is avoided. Quadruple equality has codimension six in dimension five and is absent. Simultaneous distinct events have combined codimension larger than the shared-time configuration dimension; independent jets at up to six points exclude them. Countably many coordinate charts and ACω allow a parameter outside the resulting countable null union. As in [F2], near a regular source point a projected coordinate is strictly monotone, excluding accumulation along deleted diagonals; near an ordinary cusp its Taylor form (bs2,e(t−t0)s+cs3), bec≠0, has a single local double arc with no accumulation of other event types. Elsewhere the relevant configurations are compact, and isolated transverse events are finite. There are no endpoint accumulations because the protected endpoint neighbourhoods are fixed and isolated, and no end-time accumulations because those diagrams are stationary and regular. These arguments prove the required relative version directly; they do not apply a closed-source statement to an interval without modification.

6.1F1F2F3step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1construct∎

The relative movie. By [F3], each exceptional time of step 5.1 gives one oriented R1, R2 or R3 in an interior disk disjoint from the protected endpoint collars. Between events, continue crossings by the inverse function theorem and extend the motions of the intervening embedded edges by normal-coordinate cutoffs, as in [F2]. The cutoffs can vanish on the protected collars, since those arcs are stationary and isolated. Hence the intervening planar isotopies fix them too. A finite subdivision of time and composition produces the asserted finite relative movie. The construction starts with either pair of marks, including two different marks on one diagram, so it proves that case as well. ACω has been used only in [F1], [F2] and their countable chart unions.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions

Definition

Let D be a nonempty finite regular oriented link diagram in an oriented 3-sphere, with finite crossing set C(D). Fix a unit viewing normal n and orient the projection plane P so (u,v) is positive exactly when (n,u,v) is positive in the ambient 3-space. At a crossing c, define its sign as the sign of det⁡P(vover,vunder), where the two nonzero projected tangent vectors follow the oriented over- and under-strands. Let n+ and n− be the numbers of positive and negative crossings.

Set A=Z[X]/(X2), with deg⁡(1)=1 and deg⁡(X)=−1. Its unit, multiplication, counit, and comultiplication are

η(1)=1,m(1⊗1)=1,m(1⊗X)=m(X⊗1)=X,m(X⊗X)=0, ϵ(1)=0,ϵ(X)=1,Δ(1)=1⊗X+X⊗1,Δ(X)=X⊗X.

Thus m and Δ have quantum degree −1, while η and ϵ have degree +1.

Choose a total order c1<⋯<cn on C(D). A resolution state is a function v:C(D)→{0,1}; at v(c)=0 use the A-smoothing and at v(c)=1 use the B-smoothing from the Kauffman source chart. Write ∣v∣=∑cv(c), let Dv be the crossingless resolution, and let k(v) be its number of circles. Assign the state module A⊗k(v). For an edge v→v+ej changing crossing cj from 0 to 1, use m if the local smoothing merges two circles and Δ if it splits one circle, tensored with the identity on all other factors, and multiply this map by (−1)∑i<jv(ci). The resulting direct sum has cohomological degree i(v)=∣v∣−n− and the generator with circle labels 1 or X has quantum degree j(v)=∣v∣+n+−2n−+∑circle labels adeg⁡(a). This defines the normalized integral Khovanov cube and its candidate degree-zero cochain differential; the assertion that the differential squares to zero is a separate lemma.

The Frobenius identity that controls a merge-split face is represented by the two equal composites below. The diagram records the maps only; the proof verifies the equality on the basis {1,X}⊗2 and does not rely on the drawing.

A¬AAA¬A¬AA¬Am¢¬id¢id¬m

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty finite regular oriented diagram D, a total order of its crossing set, and the operations displayed in the Definition.

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

The quotient by the monic polynomial X2 is the free abelian group with basis 1,X. The displayed multiplication is the quotient-ring multiplication, so it is associative, commutative, and has unit 1. On this basis, ϵ and Δ satisfy both counit identities; explicitly, (ϵ⊗id)Δ(1)=1, (id⊗ϵ)Δ(1)=1, and the same composites send X to X.

1.2givenalgebra

Cocommutativity follows by swapping tensor factors in the two displayed values of Δ. For coassociativity, both (Δ⊗id)Δ(1) and (id⊗Δ)Δ(1) equal 1⊗X⊗X+X⊗1⊗X+X⊗X⊗1, and both composites send X to X⊗X⊗X. Hence (A,m,η,Δ,ϵ) is a commutative Frobenius algebra once the Frobenius compatibility is checked.

2.1givenstep 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

On the ordered basis 1⊗1,1⊗X,X⊗1,X⊗X of A⊗A, each of (m⊗id)(id⊗Δ), Δm, and (id⊗m)(Δ⊗id) has respective outputs 1⊗X+X⊗1, X⊗X, X⊗X, and 0. Thus the Frobenius identities hold. The degree shifts in the Definition give each edge map total quantum degree 0; the quotient-ring construction and all checks are choice-free.

AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Khovanov chain complex from a diagram

Definition

Input: a nonempty finite regular oriented link diagram D and a total order c1<⋯<cn on its crossing set. A diagram object is supplied as mathematical input; this procedure does not parse a serialized string.

Output: the normalized bigraded Khovanov cochain module Ci,j(D) and its candidate differential d:Ci,j(D)→Ci+1,j(D), constructed by the following finite instructions.

  1. Enumerate every state v:C(D)→{0,1} once. Form the crossingless resolution by using the A-smoothing at v(c)=0 and the B-smoothing at v(c)=1.
  2. For each state, create one tensor factor of the integral Frobenius algebra for each resolution circle and place the resulting tensor product in cohomological degree ∣v∣−n− and quantum degree ∣v∣+n+−2n−+∑deg⁡(a) for its circle labels a.
  3. For each state and each crossing cj with v(cj)=0, create the edge to v+ej. Apply multiplication if that smoothing change merges two circles, comultiplication if it splits one circle, the identity on other tensor factors, and the sign (−1)∑i<jv(ci). Sum the edge maps out of every state to obtain d.
  4. Return the finite direct sum of the state modules with these degrees and maps. The square-zero property is the separate local lemma named by justified_by.
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The Khovanov cube differential squares to zero

Statement

Let D be a finite regular oriented link diagram, order its crossings as c1<⋯<cn, and form the direct sum of state modules A⊗k(v) over all functions v:C(D)→{0,1}. Here A=Z[X]/(X2), each crossing is changed from its A-smoothing at 0 to its B-smoothing at 1, and the edge map is the multiplication m for a merge or comultiplication Δ for a split, multiplied by (−1)∑i<jv(ci) on the edge at cj. Then the sum d of all edge maps satisfies d2=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite ordered crossing set, the state modules and edge maps in the Lemma.

[F1]

The multiplication and comultiplication on A obey associativity, coassociativity, commutativity, cocommutativity, and the Frobenius identities (m⊗id)(id⊗Δ)=Δm=(id⊗m)(Δ⊗id) (Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions).

[F2]

The differential is the sum of the signed edge maps, and the sign on the edge changing coordinate j is (−1)∑i<jv(ci) (Khovanov chain complex from a diagram).

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

Fix a state v and two distinct coordinates i<j with v(ci)=v(cj)=0. The two length-two paths from v to v+ei+ej induce equal unsigned maps: saddles on disjoint circles commute as tensor maps; when the two saddles meet one component, the three possible merge/split patterns give respectively associativity, coassociativity, or one of the two equal Frobenius composites in [F1]. These are all possibilities because each edge changes one smoothing by one saddle.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra∎

The sign on the path that changes i then j has exponent ∑r<iv(cr)+∑r<jv(cr)+1, while the path that changes j then i has exponent ∑r<jv(cr)+∑r<iv(cr). Their signs are opposite, so the two equal unsigned composites from step 1.1 cancel in the sum defining the component of d2 from v to v+ei+ej. If there are fewer than two crossings, no length-two paths occur and d2 is the empty sum; otherwise every term of d2 lies in exactly one such pair. Hence d2=0.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Reduced Khovanov cohomology of a knot

Definition

Let (D,p) be a finite regular oriented diagram of a knot with a basepoint p away from the crossings, and let C(D) be its normalized integral Khovanov cochain complex. At each resolution state, let Xp act by multiplication by X on the tensor factor for the circle containing p, and by the identity on every other circle factor. The basepoint action is the direct sum of these statewise maps. Define the reduced cochain complex by C~(D,p):=C(D)/im⁡(Xp), with the same cohomological grading and with reduced quantum degree j~=j−1 for the class represented by a state whose basepoint circle is labelled 1. Its cohomology is the reduced integral Khovanov cohomology Kh~i,j~(D,p). The unknot is normalized so that its reduced group lies in bidegree (0,0).

Equivalently, cut the based knot at p to a one-interval tangle. Put M=Z in quantum degree 0 with X⋅1=0. A resolution with k closed circles and the distinguished interval is assigned A⊗k⊗M. An edge that merges a circle into the interval uses mM(1⊗1)=1 and mM(X⊗1)=0; an edge that splits the interval uses ΔM(1)=X⊗1, where the circle factor is written first and the interval factor second. Edges not meeting the interval use m or Δ. This based tangle cube is the quotient complex above, with the stated quantum shift.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A based knot diagram (D,p) and the normalized integral Khovanov cochain complex defined in Khovanov chain complex from a diagram.

[F1]

On a resolution circle, X2=0, Δ(1)=1⊗X+X⊗1, and Δ(X)=X⊗X; multiplication is the product in Z[X]/(X2) (Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions).

[F2]

The differential is the signed sum of edge maps, each equal to multiplication or comultiplication on the factors meeting that edge and the identity on all other factors (Khovanov chain complex from a diagram).

[F3]

The signed cube differential squares to zero, so these state modules form a cochain complex (The Khovanov cube differential squares to zero).

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

If an edge does not meet the basepoint circle, its map is the identity on the basepoint factor and hence commutes with Xp. If the edge merges the basepoint circle with another circle, associativity gives m(Xa⊗b)=X m(a⊗b). If it splits the basepoint circle, the Frobenius identity gives Δ(Xa)=(X⊗1)Δ(a)=(1⊗X)Δ(a); on a=1,X these are respectively X⊗X and 0 on all three sides. Thus every edge map commutes with Xp, so im⁡(Xp) is a subcomplex.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

By [F3], the unreduced differential already squares to zero, and by step 1.1 it preserves im⁡(Xp); thus the induced quotient differential also squares to zero. In each state the based factor is A=Z{1,X}, and Xp has image Z{X}. Therefore the quotient factor is Z{1}, with raw quantum degree +1; subtracting one gives reduced degree 0.

3.1F1F2step 2.1constructalgebra∎

After cutting the based circle, every state has one distinguished interval factor M. The quotient identification sends the surviving based label 1 to 1∈M. For a merge into that interval, m(1⊗1)=1 and m(X⊗1)=0 in the quotient, exactly the displayed mM; for a split, Δ(1)=1⊗X+X⊗1 and the term with X on the distinguished interval is zero in M, leaving X⊗1, exactly ΔM(1). Edges away from the interval retain m and Δ. Hence this statewise identification commutes with every edge and gives the stated based tangle cube isomorphism.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The Khovanov diagram procedure terminates and returns a finite cochain complex

Statement

For a nonempty finite regular oriented link diagram D with n ordered crossings, the procedure that enumerates all 2n smoothing states, assigns one copy of A=Z[X]/(X2) per resolution circle, places a generator in degrees i=∣v∣−n− and j=∣v∣+n+−2n−+∑deg⁡(a), and sums the signed merge or split edge maps terminates after finitely many operations. Its output is a finite direct sum of finite-rank free abelian groups with a differential of bidegree (1,0) satisfying d2=0; hence it is a bounded bigraded cochain complex.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty finite regular oriented link diagram D with an ordered crossing set of cardinality n and the finite state procedure in the Theorem.

[F1]

The procedure traverses each function v:C(D)→{0,1} once, uses a finite number of edge maps per state, and assigns A⊗k(v) with the stated gradings (Khovanov chain complex from a diagram).

[F2]

The signed edge sum has square zero for every such finite ordered diagram (The Khovanov cube differential squares to zero).

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

If n=∣C(D)∣, there are exactly 2n states; each complete smoothing of a finite closed diagram has finitely many circles. Since A is free of rank two with basis 1,X, each state module is finite-rank free, and the finite sum of these modules is finite-rank free. The procedure visits each of finitely many states and at most n outgoing edges per state, so it terminates.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

Each edge changes ∣v∣ and i by +1 and changes the algebraic degree by −1 through m or Δ, so its total quantum-degree change is +1−1=0. By [F2] the returned differential squares to zero. The state set is finite, so only finitely many homological degrees occur; this is a bounded bigraded cochain complex.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The graded Euler characteristics have the Jones normalization

Statement

Let D be a nonempty finite regular oriented diagram of a link with n+ positive crossings, n− negative crossings, writhe w=n+−n−, and n=n++n−. For each resolution state v, let k(v) be its number of circles and let Dv use the A-smoothing at coordinates 0 and B-smoothing at coordinates 1. Put δ=−A2−A−2 and define the normalized bracket fD(A):=(−A3)−w∑v:C(D)→{0,1}An−2∣v∣δk(v)−1. For the unreduced cohomology, define χq(Kh(D))=∑i,j(−1)irank⁡ZKhi,j(D)qj. If D is a finite regular oriented diagram of a knot with a basepoint p away from all crossings, define its reduced rank Euler characteristic using the reduced quantum grading j~ by χ~q(D,p)=∑i,j~(−1)irank⁡ZKh~i,j~(D,p)qj~. Under q=−A−2 and t=q2=A−4, χq(Kh(D))=(q+q−1)fD(A),χ~q(D,p)=fD(A). Thus the unreduced unknot factor is q+q−1 and the reduced unknot factor is 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty finite oriented link diagram D, its ordered Khovanov state cube, and, when D is a based knot diagram, its reduced cochain complex.

[F1]

The Kauffman state sum is ⟨D⟩=∑vAn−2∣v∣(−A2−A−2)k(v)−1, with each state using the prescribed A/B smoothing chart (Kauffman bracket smoothing and loop value).

[F2]

The writhe is the sum of crossing signs, so w=n+−n− (Oriented crossing signs, diagram writhe, and blackboard framing).

[F3]

A state with circle labels 1,X has cohomological degree i=∣v∣−n− and quantum degree j=∣v∣+n+−2n−+∑deg⁡(a); deg⁡(1)=1, deg⁡(X)=−1, and edge maps preserve j (Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions).

[F4]

The reduced state module kills the based-circle X label and subtracts one from the original quantum degree, so the surviving based label 1 contributes degree zero (Reduced Khovanov cohomology of a knot).

[F5]

The Khovanov procedure returns a bounded bigraded cochain complex with finite-rank free state groups (The Khovanov diagram procedure terminates and returns a finite cochain complex).

Proof

1.1F5givenalgebra

Fix a quantum degree and tensor the finite free complex with Q. For an integer matrix d, the kernel after tensoring is (ker⁡d)⊗Q: if d(a/r)=0 with a integral and r≠0, then d(a)=0 because the target is torsion-free. The image after tensoring is im⁡(d)⊗Q by clearing denominators, so rationalized homology is Hi(C)⊗Q and has dimension rank⁡ZHi(C). Rank-nullity in this bounded rational complex gives dim⁡Ci=dim⁡Hi+dim⁡im⁡di+dim⁡im⁡di−1; alternating over i cancels the image dimensions. The same argument applies to the reduced complex, whose terms are finite-rank free.

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

On a state v, summing q∑deg⁡(a) over its k(v) independent labels gives (q+q−1)k(v), so the unreduced chain Euler sum is ∑v(−1)∣v∣−n−q∣v∣+n+−2n−(q+q−1)k(v). With q=−A−2, one has q+q−1=δ and, term by term, (−1)∣v∣−n−q∣v∣+n+−2n−A−(n−2∣v∣)=(−A3)−w. The state contribution is consequently (q+q−1)(−A3)−wAn−2∣v∣δk(v)−1. For the reduced cube, the based label contributes degree zero by [F4], leaving (q+q−1)k(v)−1 in place of (q+q−1)k(v), so its state contribution is (−A3)−wAn−2∣v∣δk(v)−1.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Summing the state contributions in step 2.1 gives the two displayed formulas for the chain Euler sums. Step 1.1 identifies those sums with the Euler characteristics of integral cohomology. When D is the crossingless unknot, n+=n−=0 and k=1, so the unreduced value is q+q−1 and the reduced value is 1.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Signed local cancellation models for the Khovanov Reidemeister moves

Statement

The integral signed Khovanov cubes have the local graded cancellation models described below. They are chain homotopy equivalences over every fixed exterior resolution, commute with exterior saddle differentials, and commute with multiplication by X at every marked point outside the local disk. Consequently they also give chain homotopy equivalences after taking the reduced quotient. For the crossing with A-smoothing the identity matching and B-smoothing the cap-cup matching, the two three-crossing braid cubes with words 121 and 212 retract to the same three-term complex. The two-crossing inverse-pair cube retracts to the identity matching in local cohomological degree one and quantum shift upward by one. All retractions are integral; their homotopies and the two cancellations in the three-crossing cube are specified in the proof.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The algebra A=Z[X]/(X2), its Frobenius maps, and cube signs (−1)∑a<jva, with local crossings ordered before exterior crossings.

[F1]

The Frobenius maps and their basis values are those of Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions. The corresponding signed cubes square to zero by The Khovanov cube differential squares to zero.

[F2]

In the reduced quotient the distinguished component has module M=Z, with X=0, mM(1⊗u)=u, mM(X⊗u)=0 and ΔM(u)=X⊗u (Reduced Khovanov cohomology of a knot).

Proof

1.1F1F2givenconstruct

Meaning of every local map. Use rectangles with top boundary points 1,…,n and bottom boundary points 1′,…,n′, both listed left to right. Let I join a to a′. Let Ei join top i to i+1, bottom i′ to (i+1)′, and all other a to a′. In a product UV, U is above V and equal middle labels are joined. Thus EiEi is Ei with one disjoint middle circle, and E1E2E1 is boundary-fixing planar isotopic to E1; likewise with 1,2 interchanged. For the latter assertion, trace top 1,2 to one cap, bottom 1′,2′ to one cup, and top 3 to bottom 3′ along the remaining arc; there is no closed component. Contracting the intervening bends gives the stated isotopy. Close any of these matchings by a fixed exterior resolution. Order the resulting circle factors by the least arc label on each circle, using a fixed total order on all local and exterior arcs; factor permutations have no Koszul signs. A dot on an arc means multiplication by X on the circle containing that arc. A saddle replacing an occurrence of I by Ei, or conversely, means precisely m on the two ordered circle factors if they merge, and Δ if they split, followed by the indicated factor permutation. All unmentioned factors have the identity map. This defines the maps below on every tensor basis {1,X}⊗k, even when several local arcs belong to the same global circle. In the based case use M for the distinguished factor and [F2] for a saddle meeting it.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Circle coordinates and neck cutting. For a disjoint middle circle put its factor first and write w=1⊗w1+X⊗wX. If a saddle splits that circle from an arc carrying dot operator x, its map in these coordinates is u↦(xu,u); if it merges the circle into an arc carrying dot operator y, its map is (w1,wX)↦w1+ywX. These follow from Δ(a)=1⊗Xa+X⊗a and m(a⊗b)=ab. Two successive opposite saddles between the same two local arcs equal the sum of a dot on each arc. If the arcs are on distinct circles, this is the identity Δm(a⊗b)=Xa⊗b+a⊗Xb: on 1⊗1,1⊗X,X⊗1,X⊗X, both sides are X⊗1+1⊗X,X⊗X,X⊗X,0. If they are on one circle it is mΔ(a)=2Xa. The same formulas with the distinguished factor reduced modulo X prove the assertion in that case too. These are the exact tensor interpretations of the local neck-cutting identities, including when two dot positions are on the same circle.

2.2F1step 1.1algebraconstruct

An explicit cancellation rule. Suppose a differential between consecutive degrees has block matrix (ϕβγδ):A0⊕R→B0⊕S, with ϕ an isomorphism. Set L(a,r)=(a+ϕ−1βr,r) and T(b,s)=(b,s−γϕ−1b). These invertible integral changes of coordinates give TdL−1=diag⁡(ϕ,δ−γϕ−1β). Conjugate the adjacent differentials too. The equation d2=0 and invertibility of ϕ imply that the incoming differential has zero A0 coordinate and the outgoing differential vanishes on B0. Thus there is a direct summand A0→ϕB0, contracted by h∣B0=ϕ−1, h=0 elsewhere. Inclusion and projection of the remaining coordinates, conjugated by L,T, are chain maps i,p with pi=1 and 1−ip=dh+hd. This supplies actual chain maps and a homotopy for every cancellation used below, rather than merely an acyclicity assertion. If the blocks are homogeneous, these maps have quantum degree zero and h has cohomological degree −1.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2algebraconstruct

RII: all four modules and signs. Take two strands and order the crossing with states (I,E) first, the opposite crossing with states (E,I) second. The four states 00,01,10,11 are U=E, V=I, W=E with a middle circle, and Z=E, respectively. The local differential is d0(u)=(su,xu,u),d1(v,w1,wX)=tv−w1−ywX, where s:E→I and t:I→E are the two saddles, x is the dot on the arc from which the middle circle splits, and y is the dot on the arc into which it merges. Here C1=V⊕W1⊕WX; the minus signs on the 10→11 edge are exactly the cube sign for the second crossing. Step 2.1 gives ts=x+y, so these displayed differentials square to zero. Define i(v)=(v,tv,0),p(v,w1,wX)=v−swX, with i,p zero in other local degrees, and define h1(v,w1,wX)=wX,h2(z)=(0,−z,0). Then di=0, pd=0, and pi=1. In degree zero hd=1, in degree two dh=1, and in degree one dh+hd sends (v,w1,wX) to (swX,w1−tv+(x+y)wX,wX), which is exactly 1−ip. The surviving V has local degree one and quantum grading increased by one; in the shift conventions of the question this is [−1]{−1}. Thus both acyclic pairs and the signed quotient are explicitly identified. The other crossing order follows by swapping the two cube coordinates with state sign (−1)v1v2.

3.2F1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2algebraconstruct

RIII: ordered states and the first cancellation. Let each crossing have states (I,Ei), and form the word 121 from top to bottom, with crossings ordered in that order. Write P=E1E2 and Q=E2E1. In degrees 0,1,2,3 the ordered states are I;(E1100,E2010,E1001);(P110,(E1⊔◯)101,Q011);E1111. In the last term use the boundary-fixing isotopy E1E2E1≅E1 of step 1.1. Denote a degree-one element by (a,b,c) and the circle coordinates in state 101 by (w1,wX). Introduce four precisely located saddles: u:E1→P inserts E2 below E1, v:E2→P inserts E1 above E2, w:E1→Q inserts E2 above E1, and z:E2→Q inserts E1 below E2. Let x and y be the dot operators on the bottom cup and top cap of E1, respectively. The degree-one differential is d1(a,b,c)=(−ua+vb, −xa+yc, −a+c, wc−zb), with output coordinates (P,W1,WX,Q). Indeed the six cube edges are 100→110 with sign −, 010→110 with sign +, 100→101 with sign −, 001→101 with sign +, 010→011 with sign −, and 001→011 with sign +. The two edges to 101 split the middle circle from the bottom cup or top cap, giving exactly the two displayed circle-coordinate pairs by step 2.1. The 101→111 edge has sign − and merges that middle circle into the remaining through arc of E1E2E1. Its W1→E1111 component is therefore −1, with its WX component minus the dot on that through arc. Cancel this −1 component by step 2.2. There are no remaining degree-three terms; the differential into (P,WX,Q) is the corresponding projection of the displayed d1.

4.1F1step 1.1step 2.2step 3.2algebraconstruct

The second cancellation and the common residual matrix. In the resulting complex, the c→WX component is +1. Cancel it by step 2.2: its row is −a+c, so the residual coordinate substitution is c=a. The retained degree-one coordinates are (a,b), the retained degree-two coordinates are (P,Q), and the differentials become I→(s1s2)E1⊕E2→(−uvw−z)P⊕Q, where si:I→Ei is the saddle inserting Ei. The first map is obtained from the original d0=(s1,s2,s1) by deleting the canceled coordinate; it is compatible with c=a. Repeat both cancellations for 212 with 1 and 2 interchanged. Its retained coordinates before reordering are (E2,E1) and (Q,P), with matrix (−zwv−u). Swapping both pairs, without a sign, gives exactly the preceding matrix and the preceding d0. The four entries refer to the same saddles on the same labelled boundary matchings: for instance E2→P inserts E1 above, and E1→P inserts E2 below, on both sides. Hence these are actual equal tensor maps by step 1.1, not identifications of unlabelled spaces. Their kernels, composites and signs need no further τ identities. Composing the two explicit cancellation maps and their inverses gives the RIII equivalence; the homotopy for a composite of retractions (i1,p1,h1) and (i2,p2,h2) is h1+i1h2p1.

5.1F1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1algebra

Quantum degrees. A state of local height r has quantum degree increased by r. In RII, W1 has the underlying grading of E increased by two, WX has the grading of E, and Z has the grading of E increased by two. Thus both canceled isomorphisms and the maps of step 3.1 preserve quantum degree. In RIII, W1101 and E1111 both have the grading of E1 increased by three; WX101 and E1001 both have the grading of E1 increased by one. The common residual complex has quantum increases 0,1,2 in its three degrees. Every change of coordinates in step 2.2 is therefore homogeneous.

6.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

Exterior differentials and the marked quotient. Dots commute with every exterior saddle: m(Xa,b)=Xm(a,b)=m(a,Xb) and Δ(Xa)=(X⊗1)Δ(a)=(1⊗X)Δ(a). Two saddles in disjoint local disks commute before cube signs, including when their participating arcs lie on a common global circle, by associativity, coassociativity and the Frobenius identity in [F1]. A middle circle being delooped is contained in the local disk, so no exterior saddle meets it. Boundary-fixing isotopies of the matchings preserve the labelled exterior arcs. All matrix changes, inverses of ±1 blocks, projections, inclusions and contractions above therefore commute with unsigned exterior saddles and with X at a fixed exterior marked point. The total differential, with local crossings first, is dloc+(−1)rdext on local degree r. A local homotopy lowers r by one, so its two exterior terms in dh+hd cancel; local degree-zero maps commute with the signed total differential. These identities prove the same retractions for the total cube. The identities descend modulo im⁡Xp because every map and every homotopy commutes with Xp; this argument does not assume that every local saddle acts trivially on the distinguished interval. It proves all assertions, integrally and choice-free.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Khovanov complexes are chain homotopy equivalent under Reidemeister moves

Statement

Let D,D′ be nonempty finite regular oriented link diagrams related by a planar isotopy or one oriented Reidemeister move. Let Cˉ(D) be the integral signed state cube before the writhe shifts, with cohomological degree ∣v∣ and quantum degree ∣v∣+∑deg⁡(a), and normalize it by C(D)=Cˉ(D)[n−]{2n−−n+} to obtain the state degrees i=∣v∣−n− and j=∣v∣+n+−2n−+∑deg⁡(a). Before normalization, a positive type-I curl gives Cˉ(D+)≃Cˉ(D){1}, a negative type-I curl gives Cˉ(D−)≃Cˉ(D)[−1]{−2}, a type-II move gives Cˉ(DII)≃Cˉ(D)[−1]{−1}, and a type-III move gives an unshifted equivalence. Consequently the normalized complexes are bigraded chain homotopy equivalent. If D,D′ are based knot diagrams and the move disk is disjoint from the basepoint, the same chain homotopy equivalence descends to their reduced quotient complexes, equivalently to the cut-tangle complexes with interval module M=Z, X⋅1=0.

Remark

For a type-II move, the four local resolution states and their signed edge maps have the face indexing below. The arrows record the chosen crossing order; this picture does not assert that the signed square commutes or establish the required cancellations.

U=C00V=C01W=C10Z=C11Ã2Ã1Ã3Ã4

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The normalized integral state complexes of two diagrams that differ by one local move; for the based clause, both move disks avoid the marked point.

[F1]

A=Z[X]/(X2) has basis 1,X, with m(1⊗1)=1, m(1⊗X)=m(X⊗1)=X, m(X⊗X)=0, Δ(1)=1⊗X+X⊗1, and Δ(X)=X⊗X; the maps satisfy associativity, coassociativity and the Frobenius identities (Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions).

[F2]

A state with r coordinates equal to 1 is shifted by r in quantum degree, and its edge signs are (−1)∑i<jv(ci) (Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions).

[F3]

The raw state complex becomes normalized by cohomological shift [n−] and quantum shift {2n−−n+}; in the convention C[s]i=Ci+s and M{s}j=Mj+s these shifts give exactly i=∣v∣−n− and j=∣v∣+n+−2n−+∑deg⁡(a) (Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions).

[F4]

For a based knot, the quotient removes the based-circle X label and is identified statewise with the interval module M=Z, X⋅1=0. Local maps commuting with Xp descend to this quotient, including when a local saddle meets the distinguished resolution component (Reduced Khovanov cohomology of a knot).

[F5]

The explicit four-face RII retraction, two signed RIII Gaussian cancellations, tensor-factor conventions, quantum degrees, and commutation with exterior saddle maps and Xp are proved in Signed local cancellation models for the Khovanov Reidemeister moves (local-map, cancellation-rule, RII, RIII, grading and exterior-differential proof paragraphs).

[F6]

Reindexing the chain mapping cone of the identity by Cn=K−n gives the cochain identity cone with degree-i term Ki+1⊕Ki and differential d(x,y)=(−dKx,x+dKy) (The mapping cone of a chain map).

[F7]

In the run's positively oriented crossing chart put NW=(−1,1), NE=(1,1), SE=(1,−1) and SW=(−1,−1). The overbranch is SW--NE and the underbranch is NW--SE; A pairs (NW,SW) and (NE,SE), while B pairs (NW,NE) and (SW,SE). Crossing sign is sgn⁡det⁡P(vover,vunder) (Kauffman bracket smoothing and loop value, Oriented crossing signs, diagram writhe, and blackboard framing). These are diagram conventions, not a left/right-curl sign mnemonic.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebraconstruct

Crossing order and planar isotopy. Reordering adjacent crossing coordinates a,b is corrected by the diagonal state factor s(v)=(−1)v(a)v(b): on an a-edge its ratio is (−1)v(b), and on a b-edge it is (−1)v(a), exactly the sign change from swapping their order. Thus local crossings can be ordered first, and can be restored to the original order afterward by explicit chain isomorphisms. A planar isotopy bijects labelled resolution circles and saddles, so its factor permutations give a grading-preserving chain isomorphism.

1.2F7givenconstructalgebra

The determinant sign of each curl. A Reidemeister-I return joins one of the four adjacent endpoint pairs of [F7]. For the right-hand return choose the strand direction SW→NE→SE→NW. At the crossing the over and under tangents are respectively (1,1) and (−1,1), whose determinant is 2>0. A-smoothing closes the return NE--SE into the small circle and leaves the left-hand continuing arc; B-smoothing has only the continuing arc. Thus this positive curl has the multiplication differential, small circle in local degree zero, used in the curl contraction. For the top return choose SW→NE→NW→SE. The tangents are (1,1) and (1,−1), with determinant −2<0. B-smoothing closes the top return into the small circle while A-smoothing has only the continuing arc. Thus this negative curl has the comultiplication differential, small circle in local degree one. Rotation by 180 degrees gives the left and bottom returns without changing A/B labels or determinant sign. Reversing the component direction negates both tangents and also leaves the determinant sign unchanged. These four return pairs and the two directions exhaust the oriented local R1 pictures; no orientation-reversing chart or reflection is used.

2.1F1F3F5F6F7step 1.1step 1.2algebraconstruct

Both curls, with natural contractions. For a positive curl the local differential is multiplication from a small circle and a continuing arc. Put the small-circle factor first, denote the dot on the continuing arc by x, and use coordinates 1⊗u+X⊗v. The map is (u,v)↦u+xv. Its 1-label component is the identity; cancel it, leaving v↦X⊗v−1⊗xv in degree zero. Equivalently this is j=Δ−ȷmΔ, with ȷ(v)=1⊗v; it sends 1 to X⊗1−1⊗X and X to X⊗X. The canceled pair has inverse identity, so its contraction is the explicit cancellation rule of [F5], agreeing with the cochain identity-cone contraction in [F6]. For a continuing generator of quantum degree d, both terms of this survivor have raw quantum degree d−1 and local cohomological degree zero, so the raw quantum shift is {1} in the stated lowering convention. For a negative curl the map is v↦(xv,v) into the circle coordinates; cancel its identity X-label component. The remaining 1-label coordinate 1⊗v has raw quantum degree d+2 (the circle label contributes 1 and the local state contributes 1), and is in local cohomological degree one. Thus its raw shifts are exactly [−1]{−2}. These descriptions commute with exterior saddles because the dot and the local saddle commute with them by the displayed Frobenius identities; they therefore contract the total complexes, including exterior differentials with their totalization signs. The additional normalizations are {−1} for a positive curl and [1]{2} for a negative curl, canceling the respective raw shifts.

2.2F1F2F3F5step 1.1algebraconstruct

The signed RII square. In the four states of the Remark take U=E, V=I, W=E⊔◯, Z=E, after ordering the (I,E) crossing first and the (E,I) crossing second as in [F5]. That step gives the exact differential u↦(su,xu,u) and (v,w1,wX)↦tv−w1−ywX, with ts=x+y, and the chain maps i(v)=(v,tv,0), p(v,w1,wX)=v−swX, and homotopy h1=wX, h2(z)=(0,−z,0). Their checked identity is 1−ip=dh+hd, pi=1. Thus the two canceled pairs are actual contractible summands over the integral exterior cube and the surviving identity matching is in local degree one with quantum increase one. This is precisely the raw shift [−1]{−1} in the Statement. An RII pair has one positive and one negative crossing, so its normalization changes by [1]{1} and cancels that shift. A quadratic tangency has two branches which are both graphs over their common tangent direction; orienting these graphs temporarily in the same direction puts every underlying RII picture into this model or the opposite crossing order. Reversing either actual strand arrow only changes crossing signs, still one of each, and does not change the A/B maps. Rotation of the local coordinate chart transports the same model; its crossing-order correction was proved in step 1.1.

2.3F1F2F5step 1.1algebraconstruct

The signed RIII model. Let Pi denote the crossing complex with A-state I and B-state Ei; this description fixes the smoothing convention without using a crossing-sign mnemonic. In [F5], both words P1P2P1 and P2P1P2 are retracted by two explicit cancellations to I→(s1s2)E1⊕E2→(−uvw−z)E1E2⊕E2E1. Here u appends E2 below E1, v prepends E1 above E2, w prepends E2 above E1, and z appends E1 below E2; each is the actual ordered-tensor saddle specified there. The canceled maps are the −1 from the circle's 1 coordinate in state 101 to state 111, and then the +1 from state 001 to the circle's X coordinate. The remaining cube signs are exactly the displayed matrix on both sides. Inclusion and projection after the coordinate changes of [F5] compose to mutually inverse chain maps up to the given contractions. These maps preserve quantum degree and commute with all exterior differentials by [F5]. This proves the raw, unshifted model RIII equivalence with explicit chain maps and homotopies.

3.1F1F2F3F5step 2.2step 2.3algebraconstruct

All height and orientation variants. The opposite crossing complex Ni has A-state Ei and B-state I. Step 2.2 shows that Qi=Ni[1]{1} is a two-sided inverse of Pi up to local chain homotopy; the contractions are natural under adjoining other crossings. Thus the relation aba≃bab, with a=P1,b=P2, also gives the relations with exponent triples −−−, ++−, −++, +−− and −−+, interpreting negative exponents by these explicit inverses. The −−− relation is the inverse relation; aba−1≃b−1ab follows by multiplication on the left by b−1 and on the right by a−1; a−1ba≃bab−1 follows by multiplication on the left by a−1 and on the right by b−1; their inverses give +−− and −−+. Each multiplication is stacking a crossing complex and composing the actual chain maps and homotopies, so this is an operation on complexes, not an appeal to a braid-group invariant. A generic transverse triple event can be put in a small rectangle with all three branches monotone in one longitudinal coordinate: choose a direction transverse to their three tangents and use a sufficiently thin rectangle. Their two diagrams have braid words 121 and 212. The crossings concern the pairs of strands AB,AC,BC, respectively; a strict height order has precisely the six transitive sign patterns just listed, excluding the two cyclic patterns +−+ and −+−. For any such pattern the counts of Ni agree on both sides, so the extra shifts in Qi cancel when removed. The actual oriented RIII move retains each of its three crossing signs; hence its normalizing n+,n− shifts also agree. Actual strand arrows may be arbitrary because the raw cube depends only on the smoothing chart. This proves every oriented RIII variant.

4.1F3F4F5step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 3.1algebra∎

The based quotient and conclusion. Every type-I inclusion, projection and contraction in step 2.1 is a sum of circle-coordinate maps and dots away from the marked point. By the Frobenius formulas it commutes with Xp even if its continuing arc lies on the distinguished resolution component. The same commutation for every RII/RIII map and homotopy, including compositions and inverse-pair cancellations, is proved in [F5]. Consequently all equations pi=1 and 1−ip=dh+hd descend modulo im⁡Xp. By [F4] this is exactly the reduced quotient, or equivalently the interval-module complex. Steps 1.1–3.1 and the checked shifts therefore prove every unreduced and based assertion of the Statement. All local constructions use finite integral formulas and are choice-free.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Reduced Khovanov cohomology is invariant under based moves and basepoint transport

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let K be an oriented knot and let (D,p) and (D′,p′) be finite regular oriented diagrams of K with basepoints away from all crossings. Then the reduced integral groups Kh~i,j~(D,p) and Kh~i,j~(D′,p′) are isomorphic for every (i,j~). In particular, they are invariant under Reidemeister moves supported away from the basepoint and under transport of the basepoint along the knot.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, two finite regular based diagrams of the same oriented knot, and their reduced quotient complexes.

[F1]

ACω is the axiom that every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F2]

An isotopy of smooth embeddings of a compact knot circle extends under ACω to an ambient isotopy (The isotopy extension theorem).

[F3]

The cut one-interval tangles of any two based diagrams of the same oriented knot admit a smooth isotopy relative to the two endpoints and collars, and a finite relative Reidemeister movie. The moving-ball and terminal Alexander-scaling constructions, and the spatial-cutoff general-position proof, are supplied by Cut tangles of marked knots have relative Reidemeister movies, proof steps 1.1–6.1.

[F4]

Every local move away from the mark induces a bigraded chain homotopy equivalence of the reduced quotient complexes; all local chain maps and homotopies commute with Xp before quotienting (Khovanov complexes are chain homotopy equivalent under Reidemeister moves).

[F5]

A cochain homotopy equivalence induces mutually inverse maps on cohomology (A chain homotopy, A chain homotopy equivalence).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3givenconstruct

Under ACω in [F1], apply [F3] to (D,p) and (D′,p′). Its moving-ball construction uses the compact isotopy-extension clause of [F2]. It gives a finite Reidemeister movie of their cut one-interval diagrams whose endpoints and short product collars remain fixed throughout. Closing the boundary collars by the same crossing-free cap recovers the two based diagrams. In each resolution this closure replaces the distinguished interval by the based circle and adds no crossing, so it preserves n+,n−, cohomological degree and reduced quantum degree. The quotient/interval identification is the one proved in the defining reduced-complex item.

2.1F3F4F5step 1.1algebra

Every interior R1, R2 or R3 in the movie avoids the distinguished end collars. By [F4], its chain maps and contractions descend to the reduced quotient. A planar isotopy of the tangle identifies resolution factors and preserves every signed edge map; it fixes the distinguished interval and its degree-zero module. Thus each movie segment gives a bigraded chain homotopy equivalence of the reduced complexes. By [F5], the induced cohomology maps are mutually inverse, and finite composition gives the asserted isomorphisms in every (i,j~).

3.1F1F3F4F5step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Taking a movie with just one local move gives the based-move clause. Taking the same diagram with two marks gives the basepoint-transport clause by [F3]; orientation-preserving reparametrization of the single knot circle can carry either mark to the other. The relative supplier proves this case using an actual isotopy of cut arcs and fixed collars, so no relative-boundary statement for closed-link isotopies is being assumed. Together with step 2.1 this proves the full Statement. ACω is used only through that supplier's isotopy extension and transversality, and the local algebra is choice-free.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Reduced and unreduced Khovanov Euler characteristics and the Jones polynomial

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let VL(t) be the library Jones polynomial of a nonempty oriented link L, normalized by V◯(t)=1. For every diagram D of L, put q=−A−2 and t=q2=A−4. Then the integral rank Euler characteristics satisfy ∑i,j(−1)irank⁡ZKhi,j(L)qj=(q+q−1)VL(t). If L=K is a knot with any basepoint p away from the crossings, then ∑i,j~(−1)irank⁡ZKh~i,j~(K,p)qj~=VK(t). The unreduced factor q+q−1 and reduced factor 1 are the respective unknot normalizations.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, a nonempty oriented link L, its finite-diagram complexes, and the library Jones polynomial.

[A1]

Full AC means every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Full AC implies ACω (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F2]

For a fixed finite diagram D, the integral rank Euler sums of its Khovanov cohomology are (q+q−1)fD(A) unreduced and fD(A) reduced, where q=−A−2 and fD is the writhe-normalized state sum (The graded Euler characteristics have the Jones normalization).

[F3]

Under full AC, the normalized bracket state sum equals the library Jones polynomial at t=A−4 (The bracket state sum matches the library Jones specialization).

[F4]

Under ACω, the unreduced groups are independent of the diagram, and the reduced groups of a knot are independent of the diagram and basepoint (Khovanov homology is an oriented link invariant, Reduced Khovanov cohomology is invariant under based moves and basepoint transport).

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F4givenalgebra

By [A1] and [F1], full AC supplies ACω. Hence [F4] identifies the bigraded groups computed from any finite diagram D with Khi,j(L), and in the knot case identifies the reduced groups with Kh~i,j~(K,p) for every allowed basepoint. The fixed-diagram complexes have finite rank and bounded support, so their rank Euler sums are finite.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra∎

By [F2], those Euler sums are (q+q−1)fD(A) and fD(A), respectively. By [F3], fD(A)=VL(A−4) under the stated full-AC hypothesis. Substituting q=−A−2 and t=q2=A−4 gives exactly the two formulas in the Statement. For a crossingless unknot the unreduced complex has its two generators in quantum degrees 1,−1, whereas the reduced interval module has one generator in reduced degree zero, so the respective factors are q+q−1 and 1. Since [F4] makes the groups diagram- and basepoint-independent, these are the claimed link and knot Euler characteristics.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources