Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Khovanov complexes are chain homotopy equivalent under Reidemeister moves

Statement

Let D,D′ be nonempty finite regular oriented link diagrams related by a planar isotopy or one oriented Reidemeister move. Let Cˉ(D) be the integral signed state cube before the writhe shifts, with cohomological degree ∣v∣ and quantum degree ∣v∣+∑deg⁡(a), and normalize it by C(D)=Cˉ(D)[n−]{2n−−n+} to obtain the state degrees i=∣v∣−n− and j=∣v∣+n+−2n−+∑deg⁡(a). Before normalization, a positive type-I curl gives Cˉ(D+)≃Cˉ(D){1}, a negative type-I curl gives Cˉ(D−)≃Cˉ(D)[−1]{−2}, a type-II move gives Cˉ(DII)≃Cˉ(D)[−1]{−1}, and a type-III move gives an unshifted equivalence. Consequently the normalized complexes are bigraded chain homotopy equivalent. If D,D′ are based knot diagrams and the move disk is disjoint from the basepoint, the same chain homotopy equivalence descends to their reduced quotient complexes, equivalently to the cut-tangle complexes with interval module M=Z, X⋅1=0.

Remark

For a type-II move, the four local resolution states and their signed edge maps have the face indexing below. The arrows record the chosen crossing order; this picture does not assert that the signed square commutes or establish the required cancellations.

U=C00V=C01W=C10Z=C11Ã2Ã1Ã3Ã4

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The normalized integral state complexes of two diagrams that differ by one local move; for the based clause, both move disks avoid the marked point.

[F1]

A=Z[X]/(X2) has basis 1,X, with m(1⊗1)=1, m(1⊗X)=m(X⊗1)=X, m(X⊗X)=0, Δ(1)=1⊗X+X⊗1, and Δ(X)=X⊗X; the maps satisfy associativity, coassociativity and the Frobenius identities (Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions).

[F2]

A state with r coordinates equal to 1 is shifted by r in quantum degree, and its edge signs are (−1)∑i<jv(ci) (Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions).

[F3]

The raw state complex becomes normalized by cohomological shift [n−] and quantum shift {2n−−n+}; in the convention C[s]i=Ci+s and M{s}j=Mj+s these shifts give exactly i=∣v∣−n− and j=∣v∣+n+−2n−+∑deg⁡(a) (Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions).

[F4]

For a based knot, the quotient removes the based-circle X label and is identified statewise with the interval module M=Z, X⋅1=0. Local maps commuting with Xp descend to this quotient, including when a local saddle meets the distinguished resolution component (Reduced Khovanov cohomology of a knot).

[F5]

The explicit four-face RII retraction, two signed RIII Gaussian cancellations, tensor-factor conventions, quantum degrees, and commutation with exterior saddle maps and Xp are proved in Signed local cancellation models for the Khovanov Reidemeister moves (local-map, cancellation-rule, RII, RIII, grading and exterior-differential proof paragraphs).

[F6]

Reindexing the chain mapping cone of the identity by Cn=K−n gives the cochain identity cone with degree-i term Ki+1⊕Ki and differential d(x,y)=(−dKx,x+dKy) (The mapping cone of a chain map).

[F7]

In the run's positively oriented crossing chart put NW=(−1,1), NE=(1,1), SE=(1,−1) and SW=(−1,−1). The overbranch is SW--NE and the underbranch is NW--SE; A pairs (NW,SW) and (NE,SE), while B pairs (NW,NE) and (SW,SE). Crossing sign is sgn⁡det⁡P(vover,vunder) (Kauffman bracket smoothing and loop value, Oriented crossing signs, diagram writhe, and blackboard framing). These are diagram conventions, not a left/right-curl sign mnemonic.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebraconstruct

Crossing order and planar isotopy. Reordering adjacent crossing coordinates a,b is corrected by the diagonal state factor s(v)=(−1)v(a)v(b): on an a-edge its ratio is (−1)v(b), and on a b-edge it is (−1)v(a), exactly the sign change from swapping their order. Thus local crossings can be ordered first, and can be restored to the original order afterward by explicit chain isomorphisms. A planar isotopy bijects labelled resolution circles and saddles, so its factor permutations give a grading-preserving chain isomorphism.

1.2F7givenconstructalgebra

The determinant sign of each curl. A Reidemeister-I return joins one of the four adjacent endpoint pairs of [F7]. For the right-hand return choose the strand direction SW→NE→SE→NW. At the crossing the over and under tangents are respectively (1,1) and (−1,1), whose determinant is 2>0. A-smoothing closes the return NE--SE into the small circle and leaves the left-hand continuing arc; B-smoothing has only the continuing arc. Thus this positive curl has the multiplication differential, small circle in local degree zero, used in the curl contraction. For the top return choose SW→NE→NW→SE. The tangents are (1,1) and (1,−1), with determinant −2<0. B-smoothing closes the top return into the small circle while A-smoothing has only the continuing arc. Thus this negative curl has the comultiplication differential, small circle in local degree one. Rotation by 180 degrees gives the left and bottom returns without changing A/B labels or determinant sign. Reversing the component direction negates both tangents and also leaves the determinant sign unchanged. These four return pairs and the two directions exhaust the oriented local R1 pictures; no orientation-reversing chart or reflection is used.

2.1F1F3F5F6F7step 1.1step 1.2algebraconstruct

Both curls, with natural contractions. For a positive curl the local differential is multiplication from a small circle and a continuing arc. Put the small-circle factor first, denote the dot on the continuing arc by x, and use coordinates 1⊗u+X⊗v. The map is (u,v)↦u+xv. Its 1-label component is the identity; cancel it, leaving v↦X⊗v−1⊗xv in degree zero. Equivalently this is j=Δ−ȷmΔ, with ȷ(v)=1⊗v; it sends 1 to X⊗1−1⊗X and X to X⊗X. The canceled pair has inverse identity, so its contraction is the explicit cancellation rule of [F5], agreeing with the cochain identity-cone contraction in [F6]. For a continuing generator of quantum degree d, both terms of this survivor have raw quantum degree d−1 and local cohomological degree zero, so the raw quantum shift is {1} in the stated lowering convention. For a negative curl the map is v↦(xv,v) into the circle coordinates; cancel its identity X-label component. The remaining 1-label coordinate 1⊗v has raw quantum degree d+2 (the circle label contributes 1 and the local state contributes 1), and is in local cohomological degree one. Thus its raw shifts are exactly [−1]{−2}. These descriptions commute with exterior saddles because the dot and the local saddle commute with them by the displayed Frobenius identities; they therefore contract the total complexes, including exterior differentials with their totalization signs. The additional normalizations are {−1} for a positive curl and [1]{2} for a negative curl, canceling the respective raw shifts.

2.2F1F2F3F5step 1.1algebraconstruct

The signed RII square. In the four states of the Remark take U=E, V=I, W=E⊔◯, Z=E, after ordering the (I,E) crossing first and the (E,I) crossing second as in [F5]. That step gives the exact differential u↦(su,xu,u) and (v,w1,wX)↦tv−w1−ywX, with ts=x+y, and the chain maps i(v)=(v,tv,0), p(v,w1,wX)=v−swX, and homotopy h1=wX, h2(z)=(0,−z,0). Their checked identity is 1−ip=dh+hd, pi=1. Thus the two canceled pairs are actual contractible summands over the integral exterior cube and the surviving identity matching is in local degree one with quantum increase one. This is precisely the raw shift [−1]{−1} in the Statement. An RII pair has one positive and one negative crossing, so its normalization changes by [1]{1} and cancels that shift. A quadratic tangency has two branches which are both graphs over their common tangent direction; orienting these graphs temporarily in the same direction puts every underlying RII picture into this model or the opposite crossing order. Reversing either actual strand arrow only changes crossing signs, still one of each, and does not change the A/B maps. Rotation of the local coordinate chart transports the same model; its crossing-order correction was proved in step 1.1.

2.3F1F2F5step 1.1algebraconstruct

The signed RIII model. Let Pi denote the crossing complex with A-state I and B-state Ei; this description fixes the smoothing convention without using a crossing-sign mnemonic. In [F5], both words P1P2P1 and P2P1P2 are retracted by two explicit cancellations to I→(s1s2)E1⊕E2→(−uvw−z)E1E2⊕E2E1. Here u appends E2 below E1, v prepends E1 above E2, w prepends E2 above E1, and z appends E1 below E2; each is the actual ordered-tensor saddle specified there. The canceled maps are the −1 from the circle's 1 coordinate in state 101 to state 111, and then the +1 from state 001 to the circle's X coordinate. The remaining cube signs are exactly the displayed matrix on both sides. Inclusion and projection after the coordinate changes of [F5] compose to mutually inverse chain maps up to the given contractions. These maps preserve quantum degree and commute with all exterior differentials by [F5]. This proves the raw, unshifted model RIII equivalence with explicit chain maps and homotopies.

3.1F1F2F3F5step 2.2step 2.3algebraconstruct

All height and orientation variants. The opposite crossing complex Ni has A-state Ei and B-state I. Step 2.2 shows that Qi=Ni[1]{1} is a two-sided inverse of Pi up to local chain homotopy; the contractions are natural under adjoining other crossings. Thus the relation aba≃bab, with a=P1,b=P2, also gives the relations with exponent triples −−−, ++−, −++, +−− and −−+, interpreting negative exponents by these explicit inverses. The −−− relation is the inverse relation; aba−1≃b−1ab follows by multiplication on the left by b−1 and on the right by a−1; a−1ba≃bab−1 follows by multiplication on the left by a−1 and on the right by b−1; their inverses give +−− and −−+. Each multiplication is stacking a crossing complex and composing the actual chain maps and homotopies, so this is an operation on complexes, not an appeal to a braid-group invariant. A generic transverse triple event can be put in a small rectangle with all three branches monotone in one longitudinal coordinate: choose a direction transverse to their three tangents and use a sufficiently thin rectangle. Their two diagrams have braid words 121 and 212. The crossings concern the pairs of strands AB,AC,BC, respectively; a strict height order has precisely the six transitive sign patterns just listed, excluding the two cyclic patterns +−+ and −+−. For any such pattern the counts of Ni agree on both sides, so the extra shifts in Qi cancel when removed. The actual oriented RIII move retains each of its three crossing signs; hence its normalizing n+,n− shifts also agree. Actual strand arrows may be arbitrary because the raw cube depends only on the smoothing chart. This proves every oriented RIII variant.

4.1F3F4F5step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 3.1algebra∎

The based quotient and conclusion. Every type-I inclusion, projection and contraction in step 2.1 is a sum of circle-coordinate maps and dots away from the marked point. By the Frobenius formulas it commutes with Xp even if its continuing arc lies on the distinguished resolution component. The same commutation for every RII/RIII map and homotopy, including compositions and inverse-pair cancellations, is proved in [F5]. Consequently all equations pi=1 and 1−ip=dh+hd descend modulo im⁡Xp. By [F4] this is exactly the reduced quotient, or equivalently the interval-module complex. Steps 1.1–3.1 and the checked shifts therefore prove every unreduced and based assertion of the Statement. All local constructions use finite integral formulas and are choice-free.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources