How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Khovanov homology detects the unknot — Examples and Counterexamples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Crossing signs, writhe, and linking number
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Geometric Braids and Artin Generators
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Kauffman bracket state sum and the Jones polynomial
- Khovanov homology and Jones categorification
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Oriented Links, Braid Closures, and Markov Equivalence
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sard Theorem and Transversality
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Logical flowchart
3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A graded Euler characteristic does not determine total rank
Statement refuted
The false assertion is that a finite bigraded cochain complex over is determined in total dimension by its graded Euler characteristic .
Source notes
No external statement is cited; the counterexample is finite-dimensional linear algebra.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite bigraded cochain complex over with zero differential. Its total rank is the sum of the dimensions of all bigraded groups, and its graded Euler characteristic weights degree by .
With zero differential, every cohomology group equals its corresponding cochain group by the definition of cohomology.
Counterexample
Define by and all other groups zero. Define by and all other groups zero; give both complexes zero differentials.
By [F1], the graded Euler characteristics are and , but their total dimensions are and . Therefore equal graded Euler characteristics do not determine total rank.
Remarks
This vector-space example does not assert that a nontrivial knot has the unknot's Jones polynomial. Jones-polynomial unknot detection is a separate knot-theoretic problem; a 2026 survey still describes it as open.
Remarks references
Reduced Khovanov ranks of the unknot and the three-crossing two-braid
Example
For the crossingless based unknot diagram, the reduced integral cohomology is in cohomological degree . For the based closure of the three-crossing negative two-strand braid, with the basepoint on a closure arc and cohomological degree , the reduced integral cohomology is in degrees and zero in degree . In particular, these two specified diagrams have total reduced ranks and , respectively.
The braid diagram below shows the closure convention: the two outer arcs join corresponding top and bottom endpoints, the braid strands are oriented downward, the two closure arcs are traversed from bottom to top, the three crossings are negative, and the dot marks the basepoint. The top-to-bottom braid word is , with drawn as the left incoming strand passing over the right incoming strand.
The crossing convention in this drawing is explanatory only; the verification computes the resolution cube and does not infer any differential or homology from the picture.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The crossingless based unknot and the based closure diagram of described above.
The unreduced circle algebra is with basis , multiplication , and comultiplication , ; its edge maps carry the ordered-cube signs (Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions, Definition).
For a diagram with negative crossings, a state lies in cohomological degree , and an edge from to uses for a merge and for a split, with that cube sign (Khovanov chain complex from a diagram, Definition).
In the reduced quotient the based circle factor is with ; an unbased circle retains the factor (Reduced Khovanov cohomology of a knot, Definition).
The signed cube maps form a cochain complex (The Khovanov cube differential squares to zero, Statement).
Verification
The crossingless diagram has one based circle, hence its reduced state module is in degree by [F2]–[F3]. There are no crossings and therefore no differential, so its cohomology is in degree .
First compute the auxiliary positive two-strand closure, whose -smoothing is the identity tangle and whose -smoothing is the cap-cup tangle. This is only an auxiliary raw cube; it does not change the specified negative diagram. With zero, one, two, or three cap-cup smoothings, the closure has respectively two, one, two, or three circles: composing cap-cups creates one additional internal circle each time after the first. Thus its four raw cochain degrees have modules , , , and , of ranks .
Label the three two-circle states in crossing order and identify the two unbased factors in the all- state from left to right. The last differential is Here the first and third edges split the based circle, while the middle edge splits the unbased circle; the signs are the cube signs from [F2]. Its image is exactly the subgroup generated by , , and , and its kernel consists of triples with equal coefficients of and with coefficients of satisfying .
Order crossings from top to bottom. The first differential sends to and to zero, so its image is the diagonal copy of and its kernel is . After suppressing the common based factor , the next differential is the signed incidence matrix with each integer entry multiplying the label , because each edge splits the based circle and the reduced split sends to . Its image has rank two and its kernel is the diagonal copy of .
These auxiliary raw differentials have ranks . Their images are primitive subgroups of their target free groups: the first image has a coordinate , the incidence matrix in step 2.1 has a by minor , and the last image is the coordinate span of . In each case elementary integral row and column elimination therefore gives only unit nonzero diagonal entries. Hence all auxiliary homology groups are free. The kernel/image calculations in steps 2.1 and 1.3 give raw cohomology in degrees and zero in degree .
Now return to the specified negative diagram. At each crossing its A-smoothing is cap-cup and its B-smoothing is through, so the state has exactly the same circles as the auxiliary positive state . Put the perfect integral pairing on each unbased circle, with matrix , and pair the based module with itself by . Multiplication and comultiplication are adjoints for these pairings, directly on ; the reduced merge and split are adjoints too, since , and . Use the same actual circle order on the two complementary states. For an edge in coordinate , the old transposed sign is whereas the negative cube requires . Multiplying vertex by corrects this ratio: across that edge its ratio is . Thus the negative raw cube is integrally isomorphic to the degree-reversed transpose of the auxiliary cube, with this explicit diagonal sign correction. No spatial reflection or change to the given negative crossing is used.
The reversed transpose has ranks in raw degrees , and differential ranks . Transposition preserves the unit diagonal entries proved in step 3.1, as do the unimodular pairings and in step 3.2. Each image is therefore primitive; its quotient in the kernel is torsion-free because it is a subgroup of the free quotient of the whole target. Rank-nullity now gives free homology of ranks in raw degrees . The negative diagram has three negative crossings, so the normalization gives exactly in degrees , with zero in degree . Together with step 1.1 this proves all stated ranks for the actual two diagrams.