Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Largest-summand bound for independent symmetric variables

Statement

Let Y1,…,Yn be independent symmetric real random variables, n≥1, and Sn=∑k=1nYk. For t>0, P(∣Sn∣≥t)≥12P(max⁡k≤n∣Yk∣≥t). The same bound holds when both inequalities inside the probabilities are strict. If the Yk are IID and p=P(∣Y1∣>t), then P(∣Sn∣>t)≥12(1−(1−p)n)≥12(1−e−np).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Symmetric real random variables: A real random variable X is symmetric if its law as defined in def-law-or-distribution-of-a-random-element equals the law of −X. Equivalently, P(X∈B)=P(X∈−B) for every Borel B⊆R, where −B={−b:b∈B}. No existence of an expectation is assumed in this definition. In particular atoms, including an atom at zero, are allowed.

[F2]

Independent random elements have product joint law: Let n≥1, and let Xi:(Ω,F,P)→(Si,Σi) for i<n be independent random elements. Define X=(X0,…,Xn−1):Ω→∏i<nSi. Then X is a random element of (∏i<nSi,⨂i<nΣi), and its law is the finite product of the marginal laws: PX=⨂i<nPXi.

[F3]

Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined: Let (X,A) be a measurable space and let f,g:X→R‾ be measurable. Then: 1. cf is measurable for every real scalar c; 2. max⁡(f,g), min⁡(f,g), ∣f∣, f+, and f− are measurable; 3. if f+g is pointwise defined, then f+g is measurable; 4. with the total function-product convention declared in that theorem, the pointwise product fg is measurable.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses of the statement.

1.1F2F1F3given

On Rn let Bj be the Borel set where j is the least index attaining the largest coordinate magnitude. The sets Bj partition the space and are invariant under flipping the sign of coordinate j. The product joint law and symmetry of each marginal make that sign flip measure preserving. Ties and zero coordinates are included by the least-index rule.

2.1step 1.1algebra

Fix j, and write R=∑k≠jyk. Since 2∣yj∣=∣(R+yj)−(R−yj)∣≤∣R+yj∣+∣R−yj∣, at least one of ∣R+yj∣,∣R−yj∣ is at least ∣yj∣. On Bj∩{∣yj∣≥t} the two indicators of a final magnitude at least t, before and after the sign flip, therefore sum to at least one. Integrate using flip invariance to obtain 2P(Bj∩{∣Sn∣≥t})≥P(Bj∩{∣Yj∣≥t}). The identical argument on ∣yj∣>t uses strict final events and proves their version directly.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra∎

Summing over j gives both bounds. Under IID, independence gives P(max⁡k∣Yk∣>t)=1−(1−p)n. Finally 1−p≤e−p for 0≤p≤1, so (1−p)n≤e−np. This includes p=0, p=1, and n=1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources