How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Largest-summand bound for independent symmetric variables
Statement
Let be independent symmetric real random variables, , and . For , The same bound holds when both inequalities inside the probabilities are strict. If the are IID and , then
Facts & Assumptions
Symmetric real random variables: A real random variable is symmetric if its law as defined in def-law-or-distribution-of-a-random-element equals the law of . Equivalently, for every Borel , where . No existence of an expectation is assumed in this definition. In particular atoms, including an atom at zero, are allowed.
Independent random elements have product joint law: Let , and let for be independent random elements. Define Then is a random element of , and its law is the finite product of the marginal laws:
Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined: Let be a measurable space and let be measurable. Then: 1. is measurable for every real scalar ; 2. , , , , and are measurable; 3. if is pointwise defined, then is measurable; 4. with the convention of rem-zero-times-infinity-convention-for-pointwise-products, the pointwise product is measurable.
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses of the statement.
On let be the Borel set where is the least index attaining the largest coordinate magnitude. The sets partition the space and are invariant under flipping the sign of coordinate . The product joint law and symmetry of each marginal make that sign flip measure preserving. Ties and zero coordinates are included by the least-index rule.
Fix , and write . Since , at least one of is at least . On the two indicators of a final magnitude at least , before and after the sign flip, therefore sum to at least one. Integrate using flip invariance to obtain . The identical argument on uses strict final events and proves their version directly.
Summing over gives both bounds. Under IID, independence gives . Finally for , so . This includes , , and .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Roch Note 4, Appendix A, Lemma 4.19 and proof, p. 10 (standard reference, not scraped)