Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Vanishing tail control bounds truncated second moments

Statement

Let X be a real random variable with nP(X>n)0 as positive integers n. Then xP(X>x)0 for real x, and E[X21{Xn}]n0. Moreover EXp< for every 0<p<1.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Zero truncation at a positive level: For a real random variable X and a deterministic level A>0, its zero truncation is X(A)=X1{XA}. The threshold event is measurable because X is measurable and [A,A] is Borel; its indicator and the product are measurable by thm-arithmetic-and-lattice-operations-preserve-measurability. Thus X(A) is a real random variable as in def-random-element-and-real-random-variable. It equals X at both cutoff endpoints and is zero outside the interval. Since X(A)A, for every 0<p< its absolute pth moment is at most ApP(Ω)=Ap. This is not clipping to the endpoints.

[F2]

For 0 < p < infinity, the layer-cake formula computes the integral of |f|^p from the distribution function: Let (X,A,μ) be a measure space, let f:XC be measurable, and let 0<p<. Then Xfpdμ=p0tp1μ({f>t})dt=p0tp1Af(t)dt, where either side may be +.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses of the statement.

1.1

For x1, put m=x. Monotonicity of the tail gives xP(X>x)(m+1)P(X>m), which tends to zero. Consequently h(t)=tP(X>t) is bounded on [0,) and tends to zero.

givenalgebra
2.1

Apply layer cake with exponent 2 to X1{Xn}. Its tail is at most that of X for t<n and is zero for tn. Thus its second moment is at most 20nh(t)dt. If h(t)ε for tM, division by n bounds this by 2n10Mh(t)dt+2ε for nM. Let n then ε0. No moment assumption on the untruncated square was used.

F1F2step 1.1algebra
3.1

For 0<p<1, layer cake gives EXp=p0tp1P(X>t)dt. On (0,1) this is at most p01tp1dt=1. If hK, the remaining integral is at most pK1tp2dt=pK/(1p)<. This also covers X=0 and bounded laws. Neither endpoint p=0 nor p=1 is asserted.

F2step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources