How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Injective module maps remain injective after localisation
Statement
Let be an injective -module homomorphism. Then the induced map
is injective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , a multiplicative subset , left -modules , and an injective -module homomorphism .
A localised fraction is zero exactly when one element of kills its numerator (A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator).
A module homomorphism preserves scalar multiplication, so for every and (Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel).
Proof
Suppose . Then , so [L1] gives for some .
By [L2], , so injectivity of gives .
Applying [L1] again, step 2.1 gives in . Hence is injective.
Depends on
Used by
- Localisation of modules is exact Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Theorem 12.20 (standard reference, not scraped)