How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The multiscale coefficient space is separable and has vanishing projection tails
Statement
For every weight sequence in Little-o multiscale coefficient space M0(w), is a separable Banach space. If retains exactly the coefficients at levels , then and for each . Every square-summable coefficient sequence belongs to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite level sets , weights , and the vanishing-tail definition of .
Little-o multiscale coefficient space M0(w): the detail norm is . Without an extra scaling coordinate the norm is ; in the Haar convention, writing for that coordinate, it is . Membership in means the normalized detail maximum tends to zero. As in that definition, every retains the finite coarsest coordinates, including when present.
Proof
Let be Cauchy in . Each coordinate is Cauchy because . In the Haar case also . Let and, when present, be the scalar limits. The uniform Cauchy bound passes to every finite collection of coordinates and then to the supremum, so in the weighted supremum norm. To see , fix , choose with , then choose so the normalized tail of is below ; for the normalized tail of is at most . Thus is complete.
Finite-support sequences with rational coordinates are countable and dense: first choose to make the tail of any small, then approximate its finitely many coordinates through level , including the scaling coordinate when present, by rationals. Hence is separable. The formula for the norm shows is a contraction, and the defining tail limit gives .
If , then implies . The right side tends to zero because its squares are level blocks of a convergent nonnegative series. Its supremum and the absolute scaling coordinate, when present, are at most , so .
Depends on
Used by
- A bounded-density Gaussian bridge has a Borel multiscale law Lemma
- Continuous and strictly increasing norm distributions for density bridges Lemma
- Finite-projection convergence and posterior tail control imply weak BvM Lemma
- CDF and multiscale credible-band calibration from weak BvM limits Theorem
- Projected empirical bridge CLT in the little-o multiscale space Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Little-o multiscale coefficient space M0(w).
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Castillo and Nickl, On the Bernstein–von Mises phenomenon for nonparametric Bayes procedures, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Giné and Nickl, Mathematical Foundations of Infinite-Dimensional Statistical Models, §5.2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)