Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A bounded-density Gaussian bridge has a Borel multiscale law

Statement

Assume AC. Let P0 have density 0≤f0≤D<∞ on [0,1], and let (ψlk) be an orthonormal wavelet system with at most C2l coordinates per level, including finitely many coarsest scaling coordinates. The Haar system is allowed. For every admissible w, there exists a Borel centered Gaussian random element GP0 of M0(w) with coefficient covariance K((l,k),(l′,k′))=P0[(ψlk−P0ψlk)(ψl′k′−P0ψl′k′)]. Its Borel law is uniquely determined by these finite-coordinate Gaussian laws.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the bounded density, orthonormal system, finite level multiplicities, and admissible weights in the Statement.

[F1]

A mean and positive-semidefinite kernel define a Gaussian process constructs a Gaussian coordinate process for any symmetric positive-semidefinite kernel under AC.

[F2]

The multiscale coefficient space is separable and has vanishing projection tails: M0(w) is a separable Banach space; its coordinate projections PJ are contractions and converge pointwise in norm to the identity.

[F3]

Characteristic function of a normal law and Uniqueness of a law from its characteristic function: centered scalar normals have characteristic function e−vt2/2 and are determined by it under AC.

[F5]

Dominated convergence passes bounded almost-sure limits through expectation.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement, including full AC.

1.1F1givenalgebra

The displayed kernel is symmetric and positive semidefinite because for any finite coefficients aj, ∑i,jaiajK(i,j)=P0[∑jaj(ψj−P0ψj)]2≥0. Thus [F1] constructs a centered jointly Gaussian coordinate sequence Z with this covariance. Each coordinate variance is at most P0ψlk2≤D.

2.1F3F4step 1.1algebra

For a centered normal of variance v≤D, completing the square in its normal density gives EetZ=evt2/2; at v=0 the variable is zero almost surely. Exponential Markov with t=u/D therefore gives Pr⁡(∣Z∣>u)≤2e−u2/(2D) when D>0, as it is for a probability density. Consequently Pr⁡{max⁡k∣Zlk∣>Rl+1}≤2C2le−R2(l+1)/(2D). Choose R with R2/(2D)>2log⁡2. The sum over l is finite, and the union bound over l≥J tends to zero. The probability that infinitely many of these events occur is therefore zero, since that event is contained in every such tail union.

3.1F2step 2.1constructalgebra

Almost surely the normalized maxima max⁡k∣Zlk∣/wl tend to zero, by step 2.1 and admissibility wl/l+1→∞; each of the finitely many remaining coordinates is finite. The event E={Z∈M0(w)} is coordinate-measurable, since the little-o condition is expressed by countable unions and intersections of the inequalities max⁡k∣Zlk∣/wl≤1/q. It has probability one. Define G=Z on E and G=0 otherwise. Its finite projections are measurable finite-dimensional random elements and converge everywhere in the separable Banach space [F2]. Hence G is Borel measurable: for every closed set F, the measurable functions d(PJG,F) converge to d(G,F); inverse images of closed sets are thus measurable, and closed sets generate the Borel sigma-algebra.

4.1F2F3F5step 3.1algebra

Let L be any continuous real linear functional on M0(w). Then L(PJG)→L(G) almost surely, and each approximant is centered normal with some variance vJ. These variances are bounded. Indeed, almost-sure convergence makes the laws tight: choose M so that Pr⁡{sup⁡J∣L(PJG)∣>M}<1/2, using that the supremum is finite almost surely. If vJ→∞ on a subsequence, the normal density bound would give Pr⁡(∣L(PJG)∣≤M)≤2M/2πvJ→0, a contradiction. Any convergent subsequence of (vJ) with limit v gives, by [F3] and [F5], EeitL(G)=e−vt2/2. Taking t=1 shows that all subsequential variance limits coincide. Thus vJ→v≥0, and [F3] identifies L(G) as N(0,v). Therefore G is a centered Borel Gaussian random element.

5.1F1F2step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

Its coordinate covariance and finite Gaussian laws are unchanged by the null-set modification in step 3.1. Finally the Borel sigma-algebra of M0(w) equals the sigma-algebra generated by its countably many coordinates: the norm is their countable weighted supremum, so all open balls about a countable dense set are coordinate-measurable, and these balls generate the topology. Thus two Borel laws with the same finite-coordinate laws agree, by uniqueness of the cylinder law in [F1] restricted to this measurable space. This proves existence and uniqueness of the stated bridge law.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources