Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Marcinkiewicz interpolation from weak (1,1) and strong (2,2)

Statement

Let (X,A,μ) be a σ-finite measure space, let 1<p<2, and let T be a sublinear operator defined on L1(X)+L2(X) and taking values in the measurable functions on X, which is of weak type (1,1) with constant A and of strong type (2,2) with constant B. Then every f∈Lp(X) satisfies ∥Tf∥p≤[p(2Ap−1+4B22−p)]1/p∥f∥p, so that T is of strong type (p,p), with the stated constant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A σ-finite measure space (X,A,μ); an exponent 1<p<2; a sublinear operator T on L1(X)+L2(X) with weak (1,1) constant A and strong (2,2) constant B; a function f∈Lp(X); a height t>0.

[F1]

Sublinearity means ∣T(af+bg)∣≤∣a∣ ∣Tf∣+∣b∣ ∣Tg∣; weak type (1,1) with constant A means μ({∣Tg∣>s})≤A∥g∥1/s for all g∈L1 and s>0; strong type (2,2) with constant B means ∥Tg∥2≤B∥g∥2 for all g∈L2 (Sublinear operators and weak or strong type (p,q) bounds).

[F2]

The distribution function of ∣g∣ is Ag(t)=μ({∣g∣>t}) (The distribution function of absolute value), and for measurable h≥0 and λ>0 one has μ({h≥λ})≤λ−1∫h dμ (Chebyshev-Markov inequality for the integral).

[F3]

For measurable g and 0<q<∞, ∫X∣g∣q dμ=q∫0∞tq−1Ag(t) dt, both sides possibly +∞ (For 0 < p < infinity, the layer-cake formula computes the integral of |f|^p from the distribution function).

[F4]

On a product of σ-finite measure spaces, a nonnegative product-measurable function may be integrated in either order (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F5]

Elements of Lp(X) are a.e. equivalence classes, and ∥⋅∥p is the quotient norm (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F5givenconstruct

Fix a representative of f and, for each height t>0, split f=f1(t)+f2(t) with f1(t):=f 1{∣f∣>t} and f2(t):=f 1{∣f∣≤t}; both are measurable, ∥f1(t)∥1=∫{∣f∣>t}∣f∣ dμ≤t1−p∥f∥pp<∞ and ∥f2(t)∥22=∫{∣f∣≤t}∣f∣2 dμ≤t2−p∥f∥pp<∞, so f1(t)∈L1, f2(t)∈L2, and both lie in L1+L2; moreover ∣f2(t)∣≤t and f=f1(t)+f2(t) pointwise.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Sublinearity gives ∣Tf∣≤∣Tf1(t)∣+∣Tf2(t)∣ pointwise, hence {∣Tf∣>t}⊆{∣Tf1(t)∣>t/2}∪{∣Tf2(t)∣>t/2}, and subadditivity of μ together with [F1] applied to f1(t) (weak (1,1) at level t/2) and to f2(t) (strong (2,2), then [F2] applied to ∣Tf2(t)∣2 at level (t/2)2) yields ATf(t)≤2At∥f1(t)∥1+4B2t2∥f2(t)∥22=2At∫{∣f∣>t}∣f∣ dμ+4B2t2∫{∣f∣≤t}∣f∣2 dμ.

3.1F3F4step 2.1algebra

Tonelli's theorem applied to the nonnegative product-measurable function (x,t)↦tp−2∣f(x)∣1{∣f(x)∣>t} on the σ-finite product X×(0,∞) converts the first term of the layer-cake integral into an X-integral: ∫0∞tp−12At(∫{∣f∣>t}∣f∣ dμ)dt=2A∫X∣f∣(∫0∣f∣tp−2 dt)dμ=2Ap−1∫X∣f∣p dμ, where the inner integral was evaluated as ∣f∣p−1/(p−1), legitimate because p−1>0, and the case f(x)=0 contributes 0.

3.2F3F4step 2.1algebra

Likewise, Tonelli applied to (x,t)↦tp−3∣f(x)∣21{∣f(x)∣≤t} gives, since p−2<0, ∫0∞tp−14B2t2(∫{∣f∣≤t}∣f∣2 dμ)dt=4B2∫X∣f∣2(∫∣f∣∞tp−3 dt)dμ=4B22−p∫X∣f∣p dμ, the inner integral being ∣f∣p−2/(2−p) and the case f(x)=0 contributing 0.

4.1F3step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2algebra∎

Combining the layer-cake identity [F3] for g=Tf with step 2.1 and steps 3.1 and 3.2 gives ∥Tf∥pp=p∫0∞tp−1ATf(t) dt≤p(2Ap−1+4B22−p)∥f∥pp, because tp−1ATf(t)≤tp−1 times the two integrands integrated in steps 3.1 and 3.2; taking p-th roots gives the asserted strong (p,p) bound. Since Tf is determined a.e. by the class of f, the bound descends to Lp(X) by [F5].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources