How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Marcinkiewicz interpolation from weak (1,1) and strong (2,2)
Statement
Let be a -finite measure space, let , and let be a sublinear operator defined on and taking values in the measurable functions on , which is of weak type with constant and of strong type with constant . Then every satisfies so that is of strong type , with the stated constant.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A -finite measure space ; an exponent ; a sublinear operator on with weak constant and strong constant ; a function ; a height .
Sublinearity means ; weak type with constant means for all and ; strong type with constant means for all (Sublinear operators and weak or strong type bounds).
The distribution function of is (The distribution function of absolute value), and for measurable and one has (Chebyshev-Markov inequality for the integral).
For measurable and , , both sides possibly (For 0 < p < infinity, the layer-cake formula computes the integral of |f|^p from the distribution function).
On a product of -finite measure spaces, a nonnegative product-measurable function may be integrated in either order (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).
Elements of are a.e. equivalence classes, and is the quotient norm (The space as the quotient by null functions).
Proof
Fix a representative of and, for each height , split with and ; both are measurable, and , so , , and both lie in ; moreover and pointwise.
Sublinearity gives pointwise, hence , and subadditivity of together with [F1] applied to (weak at level ) and to (strong , then [F2] applied to at level ) yields
Tonelli's theorem applied to the nonnegative product-measurable function on the -finite product converts the first term of the layer-cake integral into an -integral: where the inner integral was evaluated as , legitimate because , and the case contributes .
Likewise, Tonelli applied to gives, since , the inner integral being and the case contributing .
Combining the layer-cake identity [F3] for with step 2.1 and steps 3.1 and 3.2 gives because times the two integrands integrated in steps 3.1 and 3.2; taking -th roots gives the asserted strong bound. Since is determined a.e. by the class of , the bound descends to by [F5].
Depends on
- The distribution function of absolute value
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Sublinear operators and weak or strong type $(p,q)$ bounds
- Chebyshev-Markov inequality for the integral
- For 0 < p < infinity, the layer-cake formula computes the integral of |f|^p from the distribution function
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Harmonic Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, third edition (standard reference, not scraped)