How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Lp range: interpolation below two and adjoint duality above two
Statement
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Let be a linear operator defined on that is bounded on with norm , let denote its adjoint with respect to the pairing, and suppose that and both satisfy the weak bound for every and (and likewise for a compatible linear extension of to ). Then for every , , is bounded on : for the operator norm is at most and for it is at most , the same expression evaluated at the conjugate exponent .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A linear operator on , bounded on with norm ; its adjoint ; weak bounds with constant for both and ; an exponent , , with conjugate ; Countable Choice.
is the bounded adjoint: for all with the first-variable-linear pairing , and is likewise bounded on with norm (The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions).
Let be -finite, , and let be a sublinear operator on , weak with constant and strong with constant . Then for every (Marcinkiewicz interpolation from weak (1,1) and strong (2,2)).
Complex finite simple functions, and under Countable Choice also , are dense in for every (Complex finite-simple and smooth compact-support density for finite p, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
For and conjugate , (The norm is the supremum of pairings against unit functions); the Hölder and Minkowski inequalities for the complex spaces are recorded in Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm, and the integral conventions in The class of integrable functions. Monotone convergence is Monotone convergence for the integral.
Proof
Let and . Then and is defined at ; sublinearity is automatic for the linear , the weak and strong hypotheses are those assumed, so [F2] applies with and gives with .
Consequently, for every the operator has a unique bounded extension to all of with norm at most : since is dense in by [F3], step 1.1 applied to differences of test functions shows that is uniformly continuous on this dense subspace, so it extends uniquely to the closure with the same bound.
The adjoint is a bounded linear operator on with norm by [F1]; it satisfies the weak bound with constant by hypothesis, and it is linear, hence sublinear. Therefore step 2.1 applies to at the exponent whenever : for every , .
Let , and with . Using and the adjoint identity of [F1] applied to the pair , where the first inequality is Hölder's inequality [F4] and the second is step 3.1 applied to , which has . To establish before using norm recovery, put , and . If , take , with on and zero otherwise. This test is bounded on a finite-measure set, hence lies in , and satisfies , . The preceding pairing bound gives ; if the same inequality is immediate. Since increases to a full-measure set, monotone convergence gives .
If , step 4.1 and the density [F3] of in extend the bound to all with the same constant , exactly as in step 2.1. Together with step 2.1 for , this proves the asserted bounds for every , .
Depends on
- Monotone convergence for the integral
- The $L^p$ norm is the supremum of pairings against unit $L^q$ functions
- Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator
- The class $L^1(\mu)$ of integrable functions
- Marcinkiewicz interpolation from weak (1,1) and strong (2,2)
- Complex finite-simple and smooth compact-support density for finite p
- Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, third edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Terence Tao, Math 247A Lecture Notes 4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Juha Kinnunen, Harmonic Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)