Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Maximal dyadic subcubes of a cube at a height

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let n≥1, let Q0 be an axis-parallel cube with side length ℓ>0 and centre x0, and let Φ(y):=x0+ℓ(y−12(1,…,1)) be the unique translation-dilation carrying (0,1]n onto the half-open box R0 with the same centre and side length as Q0; R0 and Q0 differ by a Lebesgue-null set. The dyadic subcubes of Q0 are the images Φ(D) of the dyadic cubes D⊆(0,1]n of the all-generations grid (Dyadic cubes of all generations in R^n).

When forming averages over half-open descendants, extend functions on Q0 by zero on R0∖Q0; all such boundary changes are null. Here a dyadic subcube of Q0 means a descendant of R0, rather than literal inclusion in the open cube.

Let f≥0 satisfy f∈L1(Q0), and let α≥⟨f⟩Q0 with α>0. Then the dyadic subcubes R⊆Q0 with ⟨f⟩R>α that are maximal under inclusion are pairwise disjoint and at most countable, their union equals {Md,Q0f>α}={x∈R0:sup⁡R∋x⟨f⟩R>α} up to a Lebesgue-null set, where the supremum is over the dyadic subcubes of Q0 containing x and R0 is the half-open box above; since Q0∖R0 is Lebesgue null, this is the same as the corresponding set with Q0 in place of R0, up to a null set. Each such maximal R satisfies ⟨f⟩R≤2nα; and ∑R∣R∣≤α−1∫Q0f dλ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, the cube Q0 and its dyadic subcubes via Φ, a nonnegative f∈L1(Q0), and α≥⟨f⟩Q0 and α>0.

[F1]

For dyadic cubes D,D′ of generations k≤k′ with D∩D′≠∅ one has D′⊆D; every dyadic cube of generation k has a unique parent of generation k−1 containing it, of volume 2n times its own; and two dyadic cubes are disjoint or one contains the other (All-generation dyadic cubes: partition, volume and nesting, Dyadic cubes of all generations in R^n).

[F2]

A generation-k dyadic cube D⊆(0,1]n has centre cD and side 2−k. Its image Φ(D) is the half-open box with centre Φ(cD) and side 2−kℓ, hence ∣Φ(D)∣=ℓn∣D∣ by A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included. The map Φ is bijective, so it preserves inclusion and disjointness; the images of the generation-k descendants partition R0 for each k≥0.

[F3]

The set of all dyadic cubes is at most countable: the parameters (k,m) inject into Qn+1, which is at most countable (Qn is a countable dense subset of Rn, and rational open boxes form a countable basis, Every subset of an at most countable set is at most countable).

[F4]

For nonnegative measurable functions and measurable sets, integrals are monotone in the set (The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure, Measures are monotone) and finite on Q0 by the hypothesis f∈L1(Q0).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F4givenalgebra

Call a dyadic subcube R of Q0 bad when ⟨f⟩R>α. Every bad R satisfies α∣R∣<∫Rf dλ≤∫Q0f dλ<∞ by [F4], so ∣R∣<α−1∫Q0f; since the ancestors of a subcube have volumes ℓn2−kn growing by the factor 2n from generation to generation, only finitely many ancestors of a given bad cube can be bad. The top cube Q0 is not bad because α≥⟨f⟩Q0, and its subcube family is identified with the all-generations dyadic cubes inside (0,1]n, so the ancestors of any bad subcube that lie inside (0,1]n form a finite chain starting at the bad cube; a maximal bad subcube containing it is therefore obtained by taking the last bad member of that chain.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1

The maximal bad subcubes are pairwise disjoint: if two of them meet, [F1] and injectivity of Φ make one contain the other, and maximality forces equality. They are at most countable because they are images under the fixed map Φ of a subfamily of the at most countable dyadic grid [F3].

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1

The union of the maximal bad subcubes is exactly {Md,Q0f>α}: if x lies in a maximal bad R, then Md,Q0f(x)≥⟨f⟩R>α; conversely, if Md,Q0f(x)>α then some dyadic subcube R∋x is bad, and step 1.1 contains it in a maximal bad subcube R′, which also contains x since R∩R′≠∅ and dyadic subcubes are nested [F1]. This is an equality of sets, hence a fortiori equality up to a null set.

4.1F1F2F4step 3.1algebra∎

For a maximal bad subcube R: if R≠Q0 its parent P=Φ(D′) exists with Φ−1(R)⊊D′⊆(0,1]n and ∣P∣=2n∣R∣ by [F1] and [F2]; maximality makes P good, so ∫Rf≤∫Pf≤α∣P∣=2nα∣R∣ by [F4], and hence ⟨f⟩R≤2nα. If R=Q0 then ⟨f⟩Q0≤α≤2nα as well. Finally, pairwise disjointness gives ∑R∣R∣=∣⋃RR∣≤∣{Md,Q0f>α}∣, and on each bad R one has α∣R∣<∫Rf, so summing over the at most countable disjoint family and using f≥0 yields ∑R∣R∣≤α−1∑R∫Rf≤α−1∫Q0f.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

94 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources