How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
All-generation dyadic cubes: partition, volume and nesting
Statement
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Let and use the all-generations dyadic cubes of Dyadic cubes of all generations in R^n. Then:
- For every the generation- dyadic cubes are pairwise disjoint and cover , and each has volume .
- Every dyadic cube of generation has, for each , exactly one ancestor dyadic cube of generation containing ; in particular the parent of has generation and volume .
- If dyadic cubes of generations intersect, then ; consequently two dyadic cubes are either disjoint or one contains the other, and cubes of one generation are equal or disjoint.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer ; dyadic cubes and of generations ; an ancestor generation ; Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) is assumed only in claim 1, for the identification of the box volume with Lebesgue measure.
with , the side length is , and every dyadic cube is nonempty (Dyadic cubes of all generations in R^n).
for real parameters; when for every , its box volume is . Empty boxes have volume zero (Half-open boxes in and their volume).
For every real there is exactly one integer with (Integer part: for every real there is exactly one integer with ).
For and integers one has and ; in particular and for every (Laws of integer exponents, Integer powers ).
The order on is total and compatible with addition, and implies (The integers form a totally ordered ring); the canonical embedding is injective, preserves the order, and has image exactly the nonnegative integers, so every positive integer is the image of a unique natural number (The naturals embed in the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals).
Finite products are defined by the recursion , , and (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).
Every half-open box with real parameters satisfying for every is Lebesgue measurable with (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included).
Proof
For a real there is exactly one integer with : applying [F1] to gives a unique with , and satisfies ; uniqueness follows because any integer with gives , so and .
For and real , the condition is equivalent to , because and by [F2]; multiplying the chain by preserves the two inequalities.
For integers one has : by [F3] the positive integer is the image of a natural number , and every nonzero natural number satisfies (its predecessor is a natural number), so . Consequently, if integers and , and a real , satisfy and , then and : if then and , a contradiction, and if then , contradicting .
The box has Lebesgue measure , the last two equalities by the finite-product recursion and the power laws; here denotes Lebesgue measure, identified with the box volume by [F5].
Given , step 1.1 applied in each coordinate to the real produces exactly one integer with ; by step 1.2 the function is the unique index of a generation- dyadic cube containing . Hence the generation- cubes cover and no two distinct ones share a point, and by step 1.4 each has volume .
Put and ; by [F2], and , so in coordinate the cube is cut out by while is cut out by . If , step 1.3 with , , and gives and in every coordinate, so .
Fix and take the upper corner of ; the half-open convention places in . By step 2.1 there is exactly one generation- cube containing . Since and intersect and , step 2.2 gives . If is another generation- cube containing , it contains , hence by step 2.1. This proves unique ancestry without any erroneous scaling of the integer index. For the parent , step 1.4 gives .
Claim 1 is steps 2.1 and 1.4, claim 2 is step 3.1, and claim 3 is step 2.2 together with its same-generation special case; this proves the lemma.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Dyadic cubes of all generations in R^n
- Finite sums and finite products, by recursion
- Half-open boxes in $\mathbb{R}^n$ and their volume
- Integer powers $a^m$
- The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals
- Laws of finite sums and finite products
- Integer part: for every real $x$ there is exactly one integer $m$ with $m \le x < m + 1$
- The naturals embed in the integers
- Laws of integer exponents
- The integers form a totally ordered ring
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, third edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Juha Kinnunen, Harmonic Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)