Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

All-generation dyadic cubes: partition, volume and nesting

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Let n≥1 and use the all-generations dyadic cubes of Dyadic cubes of all generations in R^n. Then:

  1. For every k∈Z the generation-k dyadic cubes are pairwise disjoint and cover Rn, and each has volume ∣Qk,m∣=2−kn.
  2. Every dyadic cube Q of generation k has, for each j<k, exactly one ancestor dyadic cube of generation j containing Q; in particular the parent of Q has generation k−1 and volume 2n∣Q∣.
  3. If dyadic cubes Q,Q′ of generations k≤k′ intersect, then Q′⊆Q; consequently two dyadic cubes are either disjoint or one contains the other, and cubes of one generation are equal or disjoint.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n≥1; dyadic cubes Q=Qk,m and Q′=Qk′,m′ of generations k≤k′; an ancestor generation j<k; Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) is assumed only in claim 1, for the identification of the box volume with Lebesgue measure.

[L1]

Qk,m={x∈Rn:mi2−k<xi≤(mi+1)2−k for every i<n} with k∈Z, the side length is 2−k, and every dyadic cube is nonempty (Dyadic cubes of all generations in R^n).

[L2]

B(a,b)={x∈Rn:ai<xi≤bi for every i<n} for real parameters; when ai<bi for every i<n, its box volume is vol⁡(B)=∏i<n(bi−ai). Empty boxes have volume zero (Half-open boxes in Rn and their volume).

[F1]

For every real t there is exactly one integer m with m≤t<m+1 (Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with m≤x<m+1).

[F2]

For a≠0 and integers r,s one has ar+s=aras and (ar)s=ars; in particular 2k2−k=1 and 2k>0 for every k∈Z (Laws of integer exponents, Integer powers am).

[F3]

The order on Z is total and compatible with addition, and x≤y implies x+z≤y+z (The integers form a totally ordered ring); the canonical embedding N→Z is injective, preserves the order, and has image exactly the nonnegative integers, so every positive integer is the image of a unique natural number ≥1 (The naturals embed in the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals).

[F4]

Finite products are defined by the recursion Π0=1, Πσ(n)=Πn⋅an, and ∏i<n(aibi)=(∏i<nai)(∏i<nbi) (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).

[F5]

Every half-open box B(a,b) with real parameters satisfying ai≤bi for every i<n is Lebesgue measurable with λn(B(a,b))=∏i<n(bi−ai) (A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3algebra

For a real t there is exactly one integer m with m<t≤m+1: applying [F1] to −t gives a unique p with p≤−t<p+1, and m:=−p−1 satisfies m<t≤m+1; uniqueness follows because any integer m′ with m′<t≤m′+1 gives −m′−1≤−t<−m′, so −m′−1=p and m′=m.

1.2F2givenalgebra

For k∈Z and real xi, the condition mi2−k<xi≤(mi+1)2−k is equivalent to mi<2kxi≤mi+1, because 2k>0 and 2k⋅2−k=1 by [F2]; multiplying the chain by 2k preserves the two inequalities.

1.3F3algebra

For integers u<v one has u+1≤v: by [F3] the positive integer v−u is the image of a natural number d≠0, and every nonzero natural number satisfies 1≤d (its predecessor is a natural number), so v−u≥1. Consequently, if integers A<B and C, and a real t, satisfy A<t≤B and C<t≤C+1, then A≤C and C+1≤B: if C<A then C+1≤A and t≤C+1≤A<t, a contradiction, and if B<C+1 then B≤C<t, contradicting t≤B.

1.4L2F2F4F5algebra

The box Qk,m has Lebesgue measure ∣Qk,m∣=∏i<n((mi+1)2−k−mi2−k)=∏i<n2−k=(2−k)n=2−kn, the last two equalities by the finite-product recursion and the power laws; here ∣Q∣ denotes Lebesgue measure, identified with the box volume by [F5].

2.1L1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.4

Given x∈Rn, step 1.1 applied in each coordinate to the real 2kxi produces exactly one integer mi with mi<2kxi≤mi+1; by step 1.2 the function m is the unique index of a generation-k dyadic cube containing x. Hence the generation-k cubes cover Rn and no two distinct ones share a point, and by step 1.4 each has volume 2−kn.

2.2L1L2F2step 1.3algebra

Put d:=k′−k≥0 and Mi:=mi2d∈Z; by [F2], mi2−k=Mi2−k′ and (mi+1)2−k=(Mi+2d)2−k′, so in coordinate i the cube Q is cut out by Mi2−k′<xi≤(Mi+2d)2−k′ while Q′ is cut out by mi′2−k′<xi≤(mi′+1)2−k′. If x∈Q∩Q′, step 1.3 with A:=Mi, B:=Mi+2d, C:=mi′ and t:=2k′xi gives Mi≤mi′ and mi′+1≤Mi+2d in every coordinate, so Q′⊆Q.

3.1L1F2step 1.4step 2.1step 2.2algebra

Fix j<k and take the upper corner xi=(mi+1)2−k of Q; the half-open convention places x in Q. By step 2.1 there is exactly one generation-j cube P containing x. Since P and Q intersect and j<k, step 2.2 gives Q⊆P. If P′ is another generation-j cube containing Q, it contains x, hence P′=P by step 2.1. This proves unique ancestry without any erroneous scaling of the integer index. For the parent j=k−1, step 1.4 gives ∣P∣=2−(k−1)n=2n2−kn=2n∣Q∣.

4.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1∎

Claim 1 is steps 2.1 and 1.4, claim 2 is step 3.1, and claim 3 is step 2.2 together with its same-generation special case; this proves the lemma.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources