How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stokes identity on a rectangular Yee face
Statement
Let be an oriented rectangle with normal , and let be a vector field near . Orient by the outward-normal-first convention. Then The identities for normals and follow by cyclic permutation of coordinates. Reversing a face orientation reverses both integrals.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rectangle and orientation above, a vector field , and the one-dimensional fundamental theorem of calculus.
For a continuously differentiable scalar function on a closed interval, the integral of its derivative is its endpoint difference. (If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz)
Every continuous real function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable. (Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in is Riemann integrable)
For a Riemann-integrable function on a product of nondegenerate rectangles, each order in which all sections are Riemann integrable has an ordinary iterated integral equal to the product integral. (Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections)
Proof
If or , the four parameterized boundary sides consist of zero-length sides and two coincident sides traversed in opposite directions; their integrals sum to zero. The flux over this zero-area parameterized rectangle and the displayed iterated integral are also zero. This proves the degenerate cases, with the boundary integral interpreted as that four-side sum. For the remaining steps assume and . With the stated orientation, the four boundary contributions are , , , and . Apply [F1] to the two differences to rewrite their sum as .
The two integrands and are continuous on the compact rectangle, so each is Riemann integrable by [F2], as is every one-dimensional section, since it too is continuous. Riemann–Fubini [F3] identifies each double integral with either order of its iterated integral. Thus the term in step 1.1 can be written in the same -then- order as the other term.
Combining the two terms from step 1.1 using the ordering justified in step 2.1 gives , exactly the -component of the curl flux. Cyclic relabeling gives the other coordinate faces; reversing the orientation changes the sign of every boundary and flux term.
Depends on
- If $f : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^m$ is differentiable with integrable $f'$ then $\int_a^b f' = f(b)-f(a)$; and a bounded derivative makes $f$ Lipschitz
- Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in $\mathbb{R}^m$ is Riemann integrable
- Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John B. Schneider, Understanding the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method (standard reference, not scraped)