Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Stokes identity on a rectangular Yee face

Statement

Let F={(x0,y,z):y0≤y≤y1, z0≤z≤z1} be an oriented rectangle with normal ex, and let E be a C1 vector field near F. Orient ∂F by the outward-normal-first convention. Then ∫∂FE⋅t ds=∫F(curl⁡E)⋅ex dS=∫y0y1∫z0z1(∂yEz−∂zEy)(x0,y,z) dz dy. The identities for normals ey and ez follow by cyclic permutation of coordinates. Reversing a face orientation reverses both integrals.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rectangle and orientation above, a C1 vector field E, and the one-dimensional fundamental theorem of calculus.

[F1]

For a continuously differentiable scalar function on a closed interval, the integral of its derivative is its endpoint difference. (If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz)

[F2]

Every continuous real function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable. (Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm is Riemann integrable)

[F3]

For a Riemann-integrable function on a product of nondegenerate rectangles, each order in which all sections are Riemann integrable has an ordinary iterated integral equal to the product integral. (Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections)

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

If y0=y1 or z0=z1, the four parameterized boundary sides consist of zero-length sides and two coincident sides traversed in opposite directions; their integrals sum to zero. The flux over this zero-area parameterized rectangle and the displayed iterated integral are also zero. This proves the degenerate cases, with the boundary integral interpreted as that four-side sum. For the remaining steps assume y0<y1 and z0<z1. With the stated orientation, the four boundary contributions are ∫y0y1Ey(x0,y,z0) dy, ∫z0z1Ez(x0,y1,z) dz, −∫y0y1Ey(x0,y,z1) dy, and −∫z0z1Ez(x0,y0,z) dz. Apply [F1] to the two differences to rewrite their sum as −∫y0y1∫z0z1∂zEy dz dy+∫z0z1∫y0y1∂yEz dy dz.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

The two integrands ∂yEz and ∂zEy are continuous on the compact rectangle, so each is Riemann integrable by [F2], as is every one-dimensional section, since it too is continuous. Riemann–Fubini [F3] identifies each double integral with either order of its iterated integral. Thus the ∂yEz term in step 1.1 can be written in the same dy-then-dz order as the other term.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Combining the two terms from step 1.1 using the ordering justified in step 2.1 gives ∫y0y1∫z0z1(∂yEz−∂zEy) dz dy, exactly the x-component of the curl flux. Cyclic relabeling gives the other coordinate faces; reversing the orientation changes the sign of every boundary and flux term.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources