How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Second-order consistency of the homogeneous periodic Yee scheme
Statement
Let a periodic rectangular cell be discretized by a uniform Cartesian Yee grid with spacings , , and constant scalar coefficients . Let be a source-free smooth periodic Maxwell solution on , with the spatial derivatives of through total order four, , and bounded. Sample by exact oriented edge line integrals and by exact oriented face fluxes . Define With the homogeneous diagonal Hodge weights of Oriented Maxwell cochains, masses, and the Yee grid, there is a constant independent of the cell counts such that, whenever , Here . This is a smooth homogeneous periodic consistency result; it asserts no Taylor estimate across coefficient jumps or a PEC boundary closure.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A homogeneous periodic Cartesian grid, exact edge and face samples of a smooth source-free Maxwell solution, and the lossless Yee rows.
The periodic Cartesian masses use edge weights and face weights , cyclically. (Oriented Maxwell cochains, masses, and the Yee grid)
The homogeneous lossless Yee rows use the incidence curl at integer electric and half-integer magnetic times. (Lossless or midpoint-conductive Yee leapfrog update)
The continuous equations imply and . (Transient Maxwell system with piecewise materials and boundary conditions)
On each axis-parallel rectangular face, exact edge circulation equals the exact curl flux. (Stokes identity on a rectangular Yee face)
Proof
Let denote the line average of the component on an -edge; define cyclically. For values on the corresponding staggered locations, define by the four-corner formula . Expanding the four signed face incidences around an -edge and inserting [F1] gives the normalized electric operator where and is the corresponding centered staggered mixed difference. The and components follow by the same cyclic incidence expansion.
For every face, the exact circulation cochain equals the face flux of by [F4]. Taylor’s formula in time around gives Faraday’s equation in [F3] identifies the left side with . Thus each face entry of is bounded by times the derivative bound. The face weights in [F1] turn the sum of their squared entries into at most times the fixed box volume, so on the stated time range.
Taylor’s formula with integral remainder gives and . Averaging along the edge changes the midpoint value of each needed derivative by at most by the same symmetric Taylor estimate. Therefore the stencil in step 1.1 differs from by at most pointwise. The centered time second difference of the exact edge integrals differs from the edge integral of by at most times the stated fourth time-derivative bound. The continuous equation [F3] cancels the leading terms. For an -edge, the resulting electric covector entry is bounded by , with cyclic area factors for the other orientations. Summing squared entries with the reciprocal edge masses in [F1] contributes a factor proportional to per edge, so , since the dual cell volumes sum to the fixed box volume.
The electric bound from step 2.1 and the separate face bound from step 1.2 give the two asserted residual estimates.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John B. Schneider, Understanding the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method (standard reference, not scraped)