How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Meromorphic Jensen identity with a zero or pole at the centre
Statement
Let and let be nonconstant meromorphic. Near , write with and . Then for every ,
where is the angular mean on . If that circle contains a zero or pole of , its mean is interpreted by its continuous radial limit.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonconstant meromorphic on and a finite target .
Poisson–Jensen expresses the logarithm as the boundary Poisson mean minus zero Green terms plus pole Green terms (Poisson–Jensen formula for a meromorphic function on a disc).
The integrated count is (Counting, chordal proximity and characteristic).
A function holomorphic on a punctured annulus has a locally uniformly convergent Laurent expansion there (Laurent expansion on an annulus).
The divisor counts are finite on bounded discs, and and chordal proximities are finite and continuous at every positive radius (Well-definedness and radius conventions for Nevanlinna quantities).
Chordal distance and its logarithmic proximity are given by the normalized formulas in the definition (Counting, chordal proximity and characteristic).
An infinite-order zero occurs exactly when the function vanishes on a neighborhood; a finite-order zero has a local factorization (The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization).
A pole has a finite Laurent principal part, and its order is the largest negative exponent (Characterizations of poles).
The pole set is closed and discrete (Poles of a meromorphic function form a closed discrete set and are at most countable).
Holomorphic functions on a complex domain that agree on a set with an accumulation point agree everywhere (Identity theorem for holomorphic functions).
A meromorphic function is holomorphic away from its pole set (Meromorphic functions on a plane domain).
Proof
Fix a radius with no zero or pole of on its boundary, and write and . Applying [F1] to gives its boundary Poisson mean, a negative sum over -points, and a positive sum over poles; the central Green factor is .
Let be the pole set and . By [F8] and [F10], is open and is holomorphic there; it is nonempty because a discrete pole set cannot equal . For any two points of , take a bounded closed disc containing a polygonal path between them in its interior. This disc meets in finitely many points because is closed and discrete. Choose small disjoint discs around those finitely many poles, avoiding the path endpoints and containing no other poles; replacing portions of the polygonal path through these discs by arcs in the punctured discs gives a path in . Thus is connected.
If has a pole at of order , [F3] gives a Laurent expansion on a punctured disc and [F7] makes its first nonzero exponent ; subtracting finite does not change that leading exponent.
If is finite and not equal to , then is nonzero at , so its leading exponent is .
If and the zero of at had infinite order, [F6] would make vanish near . By [F9] on the connected domain from step 1.2, it would then vanish on all of ; if is empty this makes constant, while if is nonempty it contradicts [F7] at each pole. Thus the order is finite, and [F6] gives with , so its leading exponent is .
The three cases in steps 1.3, 1.4, and 2.1 show that and ; hence .
Let in step 1.1 through nondivisor points. The boundary Poisson mean tends to ; every noncentral Green term tends to or ; and the central contribution is . Comparing with step 3.1 and cancelling yields .
By [F2] and the finite divisor lists in [F4], integrating each counting step gives and . Since , step 3.1 is exactly .
For any radius meeting a divisor, the pointwise chordal identity gives . By [F4]–[F5], this mean is finite and continuous in ; the two counting functions are continuous as well. Taking regular radii to the divisor radius in step 4.2 proves the same identity there by continuous radial limit.
Depends on
- Poisson–Jensen formula for a meromorphic function on a disc
- Counting, chordal proximity and characteristic
- Well-definedness and radius conventions for Nevanlinna quantities
- Laurent expansion on an annulus
- The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization
- Characterizations of poles
- Poles of a meromorphic function form a closed discrete set and are at most countable
- Identity theorem for holomorphic functions
- Meromorphic functions on a plane domain
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexandre Eremenko, Lectures on Nevanlinna Theory, §1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Goldberg–Ostrovskii, Value Distribution of Meromorphic Functions, Ch. 1 §2 (standard reference, not scraped)