How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ahlfors–Shimizu area form of the characteristic
Statement
Let be a nonconstant meromorphic function on . At regular points set and extend continuously at poles. Define Write for a circular mean whenever it exists. If is finite, set . If is a pole and set . Then, for every , In particular, is finite and nondecreasing, and is convex as a function of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonconstant meromorphic on , the counting, proximity, and characteristic conventions in Counting, chordal proximity and characteristic, and plane area measure .
, where is the mean of (Counting, chordal proximity and characteristic).
The Laurent principal part at a pole of order begins with , where (Characterizations of poles).
A finite-order zero factors locally as with (The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization).
A holomorphic function satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equations (Complex differentiability is equivalent to real total differentiability together with a complex-linear derivative, with , or with the Cauchy–Riemann equations).
A holomorphic function is of class for every natural , hence smooth (Holomorphic functions are real analytic and smooth in their two real coordinates).
Pole counts on bounded discs are finite, and and are finite and continuous for (Well-definedness and radius conventions for Nevanlinna quantities).
A measurable function whose absolute value has finite integral is integrable (Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals).
Proof
Let be a pole of order . The leading Laurent term in [F3] gives with holomorphic and nonzero at by [F4].
On a pole-free neighbourhood write . By [F5]–[F6], the Cauchy–Riemann equations and smoothness make harmonic; for , direct differentiation gives and . Applying the real chain rule to yields .
For any and , . If , factor out the larger of and and average the uniformly convergent series . If , rotate to ; then . The logarithm is integrable since is comparable to the distance from an endpoint near and . With , symmetry and give , hence and the angular mean of is zero. The case is immediate.
Fix a regular radius , so its circle contains no pole, and list the finitely many poles in with orders ; finiteness follows from [F7]. Integrating the defining count [F1] over its step intervals gives , where if is not a pole. Each pole at radius contributes .
Put away from poles and define . The list is finite by [F7]; since is regular, it is the full pole set in a slightly larger disc. Near a listed pole , [F3] gives holomorphic and nonzero, so the singular part of is . It extends as a function through by [F6]; all other logarithmic terms are smooth near . Thus is on a neighbourhood of the closed disc.
Away from poles is continuous by holomorphic smoothness; at a pole, step 1.1 gives off the pole, which extends continuously there by [F6]. Hence is continuous and bounded on compact sets, so its absolute area integral is finite by [F8] and near zero.
Let . By step 1.3, . Using the count formula of step 1.4 gives . At the centre, : this follows from continuity of and the finite value of , or from when is a pole. Consequently .
Away from the listed poles, every is harmonic and step 1.2 gives . Both sides are continuous on the closed disc by steps 1.5 and 2.1, so the equality holds at the poles as well.
Polar coordinates and step 3.1 give , since . The angular second-derivative term in the polar Laplacian integrates to zero.
The function is at , so as , while by step 2.1. Integrating step 4.1 from to gives , and integrating once more gives . Step 2.2 now proves the claimed exact identity for every regular radius.
The area function is continuous and nondecreasing because is continuous and nonnegative; step 2.1 gives and a finite integral . The derivative of is , which is nondecreasing, so this function is convex. Finally [F7] makes continuous across pole radii; is continuous because is. Pole radii are locally finite by [F7], so regular radii approach every , and taking this limit in step 5.1 proves the identity there.
Depends on
- Counting, chordal proximity and characteristic
- Well-definedness and radius conventions for Nevanlinna quantities
- Characterizations of poles
- The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization
- Complex differentiability is equivalent to real total differentiability together with a complex-linear derivative, with $\partial_{\bar z}f=0$, or with the Cauchy–Riemann equations
- Holomorphic functions are real analytic and smooth in their two real coordinates
- Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexandre Eremenko, Lectures on Nevanlinna Theory, §3, equations (9)–(12) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Goldberg–Ostrovskii, Value Distribution of Meromorphic Functions, Ch. 1 §2, Theorem 2.6; §4, Theorem 4.2 (standard reference, not scraped)