Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-09 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A metric on a nonempty set generates an entourage uniformity whose induced topology and uniformly continuous maps are the usual metric notions, and this uniformity is separated

Statement

For a metric space (X,d)(X,d) with XX\ne\varnothing, the sets Eε={(x,y):d(x,y)<ε}E_\varepsilon=\{(x,y):d(x,y)<\varepsilon\}, ε>0\varepsilon>0, generate a separated uniformity. Its induced topology is the metric topology, and uniform continuity to another metric uniformity is exactly metric uniform continuity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Metric spaces (X,d)(X,d) and (Y,ρ)(Y,\rho) with XX\ne\varnothing and YY\ne\varnothing.

[L1]

A metric has symmetry and the triangle inequality, and a pseudometric is a metric exactly when zero distance separates points (Metric space: d(x,y)=0d(x,y) = 0 iff x=yx = y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric).

[L3]

Metric uniform continuity means: for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is δ>0\delta>0 such that d(x,x)<δd(x,x')<\delta implies ρ(f(x),f(x))<ε\rho(f(x),f(x'))<\varepsilon (Uniform continuity of a map of metric spaces: one δ\delta serving every point).

[L4]

A nonempty proper downward-directed family is a filter base, whose upward closure is the least filter containing it (Filter base and the filter it generates, The upward closure of a filter base is the smallest filter containing it).

[L5]

In an entourage uniformity, entourage balls form a neighbourhood base for the induced topology (The sets containing an entourage ball about each of their points form a topology).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The diagonal lies in every EεE_\varepsilon, inverses agree with EεE_\varepsilon by symmetry, intersections contain Emin(ε,δ)E_{\min(\varepsilon,\delta)}, and Eε/2Eε/2EεE_{\varepsilon/2}\circ E_{\varepsilon/2}\subseteq E_\varepsilon by the triangle inequality.

L1
2.1

The family (Eε)ε>0(E_\varepsilon)_{\varepsilon>0} is nonempty, none of its members is empty because XX\ne\varnothing, and it is downward directed by step 1.1, so [L4] makes its upward closure a filter. The diagonal, inverse, and square-root properties in step 1.1 then make it a uniformity. Its Eε[x]E_\varepsilon[x] are precisely metric balls, so its induced topology is the metric topology by [L2] and [L5].

step 1.1L2L4L5
2.2

The intersection of all EεE_\varepsilon is the diagonal, since d(x,y)>0d(x,y)>0 for xyx\ne y and Ed(x,y)/2E_{d(x,y)/2} excludes (x,y)(x,y); hence the uniformity is separated.

L1step 1.1
3.1

The defining entourage implication for EδE_\delta and EεE_\varepsilon is exactly the quantified condition of [L3], which proves the final equivalence.

L3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 40 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources