Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Samuel function pseudometrics generate a uniformity coarser than the original one

Statement

For every fFUf\in\mathcal F_{\mathcal U}, the function pf(x,y)=f(x)f(y)p_f(x,y)=|f(x)-f(y)| of The Samuel uniformity generated by bounded uniformly continuous functions is a pseudometric. Every basic Samuel entourage is an entourage of U\mathcal U; hence USU\mathcal U_S\subseteq\mathcal U. Moreover the gauge obtained from all bounded real-valued uniformly continuous functions generates the same uniformity as US\mathcal U_S.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A uniform space (X,U)(X,\mathcal U), a uniformly continuous f:X[0,1]f:X\to[0,1], and positive reals ε\varepsilon and MM.

[L1]

For real numbers, u0|u|\ge0, u=0|u|=0 exactly when u=0u=0, and u=u|-u|=|u| (Basic properties of the absolute value).

[L2]

The real triangle inequality is u+vu+v|u+v|\le|u|+|v| (The triangle inequality).

[L3]

The sets {(s,t):st<ε}\{(s,t):|s-t|<\varepsilon\} generate the metric uniformity of [0,1][0,1], and metric uniform continuity is the corresponding epsilon-delta condition (A metric on a nonempty set generates an entourage uniformity whose induced topology and uniformly continuous maps are the usual metric notions, and this uniformity is separated).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The diagonal and symmetry axioms for pfp_f follow from [L1], while pf(x,z)pf(x,y)+pf(y,z)p_f(x,z)\le p_f(x,y)+p_f(y,z) follows by applying [L2] to f(x)f(z)=(f(x)f(y))+(f(y)f(z))f(x)-f(z)=(f(x)-f(y))+(f(y)-f(z)); thus pfp_f is a pseudometric.

L1L2
1.2

For every ε>0\varepsilon>0, uniform continuity of ff and [L3] give an entourage UU of U\mathcal U with (x,y)U(x,y)\in U implying pf(x,y)<εp_f(x,y)<\varepsilon.

L3
1.3

If g:XRg:X\to\mathbb R is uniformly continuous with gM|g|\le M, then for M>0M>0 the map h=(g+M)/(2M)h=(g+M)/(2M) is [0,1][0,1]-valued and uniformly continuous: for a target tolerance δ>0\delta>0, use uniform continuity of gg with tolerance 2Mδ2M\delta. Moreover pg=2Mphp_g=2M p_h; if M=0M=0, gg is constant. Thus the two gauges have the same basic entourages.

construct
2.1

For a basic Samuel entourage, step 1.2 gives an original entourage inside each of its finitely many coordinate balls; their finite intersection is therefore an original entourage contained in the basic Samuel entourage. Hence every basic Samuel entourage belongs to U\mathcal U, and so does the generated filter.

step 1.2
3.1

Steps 1.1, 2.1, and 1.3 prove all assertions.

step 1.1step 2.1step 1.3

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The Samuel uniformity generated by bounded uniformly continuous functions.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 42 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources