Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

PBW and bubble normal form in the minimal-parabolic diagram category

Statement

Fix a color i. In the formal graded minimal-parabolic proof category of The minimal-parabolic KLR diagram proof category, the reduced perfect-matching diagrams, dot monomials on their open components, and monomials in the independent far-left normalized i-bubble coefficients form a basis of every morphism space. In particular, at all-downward boundaries of weight difference β, the morphism space is the corresponding KLR PBW corner tensored with the polynomial ring in one positive bubble family; the opposite/fake family is its coefficientwise reciprocal. The graded polynomial flag models of The minimal-parabolic polynomial flag model realizes the graded diagram relations, with universal monic framing and arbitrarily large auxiliary framing at each fixed physical source weight, are jointly faithful. The assertion is about this formal proof category before cyclotomic quotient transfer.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The formal graded minimal-parabolic proof category Pi of The minimal-parabolic KLR diagram proof category for a fixed color i, with its generators, graded shifts and relations.

[F1]

The relations of Pi are the model-verified local equations of The minimal-parabolic polynomial flag model realizes the graded diagram relations: downward KLR relations, both rank-one triangles with cyclic dots, the rho/cross-and-cap equations, bubble inversion, the mixed cap/cup equations and the finite-coefficient bubble slides; the polynomial flag models realize all of them.

[F3]

The complete oriented normal-form and fixed-weight faithful-witness construction is proved in Oriented minimal-parabolic normal forms and the cyclotomic cap ideal: its disk routing lowers crossing count before accounting for inserted extrema, and its generic free-root leading matching test treats arbitrary oriented boundaries without individually bending interior upward endpoints.

Proof

Proof technique: apply the independently proved finite oriented straightening and faithful universal-framing separation, retaining the exact normal forms.

1.1F1F2F3construct

Finite spanning and the downward corner. The construction in [F3] first counts intersections, clears an innermost monogon/bigon by its finite disk sweep and uses the typed curl/cancellation and KLR equations. A correction may add extrema, but it removes crossings and hence enters a smaller primary induction value. After intersections are reduced, triangles remove extra extrema, finite coefficient slides move bubbles left, and reciprocal coefficients are finite polynomials in the positive family. The output is precisely the reduced matching, open-dot and far-left bubble family of the Statement. With all boundaries downward, each open component is a colored permutation strand and the reduced crossings and dots are the chosen KLR PBW family [F2]. Thus the claimed downward tensor product follows once independence is established.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F3algebra

Independence and joint faithfulness. The actual flag witness of [F3] assigns distinct free framing roots to the open components of a maximal crossing-number matching. Its leading root-label transport has a nonzero crossing/cup/cap coefficient; any other term deletes a crossing, and a different maximal matching imposes different endpoint equalities. Unused complementary framing roots make the finitely many bubble coefficients a unit triangular independent family over the component roots. This remains valid when spectator factors are inseparable: only free framing roots enter the selected flag summands. For a downward PBW combination the same construction has the concrete fixed-source-weight degree witness: take background count r increasing, total degree N=h+2r and framing degree N−Amathrmspect; all tested flag relations then have degree greater than the fixed nonzero polynomial output. Every finite nonzero normal-form combination therefore survives in an actual flag model. This proves independence at arbitrary boundaries and joint faithfulness, with the normalized Hi and word shifts already fixed by [F1]. No unrelated cyclotomic quotient or Frobenius conclusion is used.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F3∎

The family spanning in step 1.1 is independent by step 2.1, so it is a basis and its all-downward corner is the stated KLR PBW corner tensored with the polynomial positive-bubble ring. Bubble inversion expresses the opposite family by its reciprocal, and the finite straightening has unique output coefficients because this basis is independent. The assertions hold in every characteristic for all the admissible homogeneous parameters and concern the formal category before quotient transfer.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources