Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Minimal primes over a proper ideal exist

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let R be a commutative ring and let IR be a proper ideal. Then there exists a prime ideal p of R containing I that is minimal with respect to inclusion among the prime ideals containing I.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, a proper ideal IR, and the Axiom of Choice.

[L1]

If an ideal is disjoint from a multiplicative set, then some prime ideal contains it and stays disjoint from that set (A prime containing an ideal and avoiding a multiplicative set).

[L2]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, every nonempty poset in which every chain has an upper bound has a maximal element (Zorn's lemma).

[L3]

Prime ideals are ordered by inclusion as ideals (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The singleton set {1} is multiplicative and is disjoint from I because I is proper. Applying [L1] gives at least one prime ideal containing I. Let Σ be the set of all prime ideals containing I, ordered by reverse inclusion. Then Σ.

L1givenconstruct
1.2

Let CΣ be a chain. Put

q=pCp.

Then Iq. To see that q is prime, let abq and assume a,bq. Choose pa,pbC with apa and bpb. Since C is totally ordered by inclusion, either papb or pbpa. In the first case bpa because papb; in the second case apb. Either way one of the primes in the chain contains ab but neither factor, a contradiction. Thus qΣ, and it is an upper bound of C in the reverse-inclusion order.

L3choosealgebra
2.1

By [L2], the poset Σ has a maximal element for reverse inclusion. Such an element is exactly a prime ideal minimal by ordinary inclusion among the primes containing I.

L2step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Therefore every proper ideal lies under a minimal prime ideal.

step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources