How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Moore-Penrose products are orthogonal projectors
Statement
Let be any finite real or complex matrix, and let be its unique Moore-Penrose inverse. Then and are self-adjoint idempotents. The range of is , and the range of is . Thus both are orthogonal projections. If has full row rank, then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite matrix over .
The Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse as the solution of the four Penrose equations: satisfies , , and both and are self-adjoint.
Every finite real or complex matrix has a unique Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse: every finite real or complex matrix has a unique matrix satisfying the four Moore-Penrose equations.
Proof
By [F1], and . Also , and . Hence both products are self-adjoint idempotents.
The range of is contained in because , while by [F1], so . Thus . The range of is contained in , and by [F1], so these ranges are equal.
A self-adjoint idempotent is the orthogonal projection onto its range: each vector decomposes as , the first term lies in the range, the second lies in the kernel, and self-adjointness makes the range orthogonal to the kernel. The same argument applies to . If has full row rank, , so step 2.1 gives and therefore .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Per-Gunnar Martinsson and Joel A. Tropp, Randomized Numerical Linear Algebra: Foundations & Algorithms, §§13.1–13.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alex Gittens and Michael W. Mahoney, Revisiting the Nyström Method, §4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)