Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fortin operators transfer the continuous inf-sup bound

Statement

Let Vh⊂V and Qh⊂Q, and suppose the continuous inf-sup constant of b is β>0. If Qh={0} the constraint assertion is vacuous. Otherwise, for a Fortin operator as in Fortin operator for a discrete constraint with bound CF, define βh:=inf⁡qh≠0sup⁡vh≠0b(vh,qh)/(∥vh∥V∥qh∥Q). Then βh≥β/CF.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Conforming subspaces, β>0, and a bounded linear Fortin operator preserving b against Qh.

[F1]

For all v∈V and qh∈Qh, b(Πhv,qh)=b(v,qh) and ∥Πhv∥V≤CF∥v∥V. (Fortin operator for a discrete constraint)

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

The case Qh={0} is vacuous, so fix qh≠0. In these real spaces, replacing a nonzero velocity by its negative shows that the supremum of b(v,qh)/∥v∥V equals the supremum with ∣b(v,qh)∣ in the numerator, both on V and on any nonzero subspace Vh. The continuous inf-sup bound gives sup⁡v≠0∣b(v,qh)∣/∥v∥V≥β∥qh∥Q>0, so some v has b(v,qh)≠0. Constraint preservation [F1] then implies Πhv≠0, and its norm bound forces CF>0; in particular Vh≠{0}. Define s(qh):=sup⁡vh≠0∣b(vh,qh)∣/∥vh∥V. For every nonzero v∈V with Πhv≠0, [F1] and the definition of this fixed-qh supremum give ∣b(v,qh)∣=∣b(Πhv,qh)∣≤s(qh)∥Πhv∥V≤CFs(qh)∥v∥V. If Πhv=0, preservation gives b(v,qh)=0, so the same bound holds.

2.1givenalgebrastep 1.1∎

Taking the supremum over nonzero v in step 1.1 and using the continuous bound yields β∥qh∥Q≤CFs(qh). Divide by the positive CF∥qh∥Q, and only then take the infimum over qh≠0. The real-sign equivalence in step 1.1 identifies inf⁡qh≠0s(qh)/∥qh∥Q with the stated βh, giving βh≥β/CF.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources