Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Steady MINI Stokes pressure-mass Schur bounds

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let D⊂Rd, d∈{2,3}, be a bounded connected Lipschitz polygonal or polyhedral domain with a finite, nonempty conforming shape-regular affine simplicial mesh. Use the MINI spaces (Vh,Qh) of The conforming P1-bubble/P1 mini element, the Stokes norms and bilinear forms of Stokes velocity and pressure spaces and weak forms, and the viscous velocity form aν(v,w)=2ν∫Dε(v):ε(w),ν>0. Let Ah,Bh be the matrices of aν and b(v,q)=−∫Dq div⁡v in any bases, and let MQ be the L2(D) pressure mass matrix. Use the symmetric saddle convention of Symmetric saddle-point system, Schur complement, and block preconditioners. With Sh=BhAh−1BhT, the steady Stokes pressure Schur complement satisfies (CFCdiv(D))−2ν(1+d)MQ⪯Sh⪯dνMQ. Here CF is the shape-regularity-uniform Fortin norm bound and Cdiv(D) is the continuous divergence right-inverse bound in Uniform Fortin stability of the mini element. The result is for the steady velocity stiffness; it asserts no corresponding bound for an unsteady shifted Schur complement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the MINI Stokes pair on the stated finite nonempty mesh family, the homogeneous Dirichlet strain identity, and the generic Schur estimate from inf-sup stability.

[F1]

The velocity norm is ∥v∥V=∥∇v∥L2(D), the pressure norm is ∥q∥Q=∥q∥L2(D), and the Stokes form is b(v,q)=−∫Dq div⁡v (Stokes velocity and pressure spaces and weak forms).

[F2]

The MINI pair consists of continuous piecewise affine zero-boundary velocities enriched by cell bubbles and continuous piecewise affine mean-zero pressures on a conforming shape-regular affine simplicial mesh (The conforming P1-bubble/P1 mini element).

[F3]

On a finite connected conforming mesh, dim⁡Vh=dNv,0+dNK and dim⁡Qh=Nv−1 (Local and global dimensions of the mini element).

[F4]

For v∈H01(D;Rd), 2∥ε(v)∥22=∥∇v∥22+∥div⁡v∥22 (The homogeneous Dirichlet strain identity).

[F5]

The mini-element discrete inf-sup constant satisfies βh≥(CFCdiv(D))−1, with CF independent of mesh size (Uniform Fortin stability of the mini element).

[F6]

If α∥v∥V2≤a(v,v)≤Λ∥v∥V2, ∣b(v,q)∣≤Cb∥v∥V∥q∥Q, and the inf-sup constant is β, then (β2/Λ)MQ⪯BA−1BT⪯(Cb2/α)MQ (Pressure Schur equivalence from inf-sup, continuity, and stiffness scaling).

[F8]

Holder's integral inequality gives ∣∫Dfg∣≤∥f∥L2(D)∥g∥L2(D) (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).

[F9]

The generic saddle system has positive finite velocity and pressure dimensions, an SPD velocity matrix, and a full-row-rank constraint matrix (Symmetric saddle-point system, Schur complement, and block preconditioners).

[F10]

The mini inf-sup constant is βh=inf⁡qh≠0sup⁡vh≠0b(vh,qh)/(∥vh∥V∥qh∥Q) (Fortin operators transfer the continuous inf-sup bound).

[A1]

Countable Choice is the only choice principle assumed in the MINI, Korn and Fortin supplier chain (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

1.1A1F1F3F4F6F7F9givenalgebra

The given finite nonempty mesh contains at least one d-simplex, so NK≥1 and Nv≥d+1. The dimension formulas [F3] give dim⁡Vh≥d>0 and dim⁡Qh≥d>0, verifying the dimension hypotheses in [F9]. For every nonzero pressure coefficient vector q, qTMQq=∥qh∥22>0 by the pressure norm in [F1], so MQ is SPD. For every v∈Vh, [F4] and coordinate Cauchy--Schwarz [F7] give ∣div⁡v∣2≤d∣∇v∣2 pointwise. Integrating this inequality and using [F4] yields ν∥∇v∥22≤aν(v,v)≤ν(1+d)∥∇v∥22. The first inequality drops the nonnegative divergence term in [F4]; the second integrates the pointwise estimate. Thus α=ν and Λ=ν(1+d) in [F6].

1.2F1F2F6F8algebra

For v∈Vh and q∈Qh, Holder's inequality [F8] and the same pointwise divergence bound give ∣b(v,q)∣≤∥q∥2∥div⁡v∥2≤d∥q∥2∥∇v∥2. Hence the continuity constant in [F6] is Cb=d.

2.1A1F5F6F9F10step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

By [F5] and the definition [F10], the inf-sup constant in [F6] is at least β=(CFCdiv(D))−1>0. If BhTq=0 for a nonzero pressure vector, then b(v,q)=qTBhv=0 for every v, making the supremum in [F10] zero and contradicting this positive lower bound. Thus Bh has full row rank as required by [F9]. The lower bound in step 1.1 makes Ah positive definite. Apply [F6] with the constants established in steps 1.1–1.2. Its lower coefficient is (CFCdiv(D))−2/(ν(1+d)) and its upper coefficient is d/ν. This is the asserted steady pressure-mass Schur bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources