Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Weak H(div) normal trace surjects onto the scalar trace dual

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and the local trace quotient convention of Weak normal trace by Green duality. Let D⊂Rd be open; all spaces are real. With TD=H1(D)/H01(D) and its quotient norm, the weak normal trace map γn:H(div⁡;D)⟶TD′,⟨γnτ,[w]⟩=∫D(τ⋅∇w+(div⁡τ)w), is onto. In fact every L∈TD′ has a lift τ∈H(div⁡;D) satisfying γnτ=L and ∥τ∥H(div⁡)≤∥L∥TD′.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, an open set D, and a bounded real linear functional L on TD.

[A1]

Countable Choice is used by the Sobolev and Hilbert Riesz interfaces. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

H1(D) consists of real L2 functions with all first distributional derivatives in L2, and H01(D) is the H1 closure of Cc∞(D). (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure)

[F2]

Real L2 is complete for its integral inner product. (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space)

[F3]

Riesz represents each bounded real functional on a Hilbert space by a vector of the same norm. (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces)

[F4]

For τ∈H(div⁡;D) the weak normal trace is the displayed Green functional on TD. (Weak normal trace by Green duality)

[F5]

H(div⁡;D) requires an L2 vector field and an L2 distributional divergence. (The real H(div) space)

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3given

The space H1(D) is Hilbert for (z,w)H1=(z,w)L2+(∇z,∇w)L2. Indeed, a Cauchy sequence of functions and their weak derivatives converges componentwise in L2 by [F2]; testing against Cc∞(D) and passing both integrals to the limits shows the derivative limits are the weak derivatives of the function limit. The quotient map q:H1(D)→TD has norm at most one, so Λ(w):=L(qw) is bounded on H1(D) with ∥Λ∥≤∥L∥. By [F3] choose its Riesz representative z∈H1(D), so Λ(w)=(∇z,∇w)+(z,w).

2.1A1F1F2F3F5step 1.1algebra

For every ϕ∈Cc∞(D), qϕ=0 because ϕ∈H01(D); hence 0=Λ(ϕ)=(∇z,∇ϕ)+(z,ϕ). By the distributional definition of divergence, this means div⁡(∇z)=z. Since z∈L2(D) and ∇z∈L2(D)d, [F5] gives τ:=∇z∈H(div⁡;D), with ∥τ∥H(div⁡)2=∥∇z∥22+∥z∥22=∥z∥H12=∥Λ∥2≤∥L∥2.

3.1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

For any [w]∈TD, [F4] and step 2.1 give ⟨γnτ,[w]⟩=(∇z,∇w)+(z,w)=Λ(w)=L([w]). Thus γnτ=L, and step 2.1 gives the claimed norm bound. Since L was arbitrary, γn is onto.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources