Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nested-dissection grid fronts are bounded by a box separator and its exterior boundary

Statement

Let d∈{2,3} and use the coordinate grid and recursive ordering of Recursive coordinate-separator ordering for two- and three-dimensional grids. For a recursion box B, let SB be its median separator; for the terminal one-vertex box take SB=B. Let ∂+B be the set of grid vertices outside B adjacent to some vertex of B. If v∈SB, then every later filled neighbor of v lies in SB∪∂+B. If every side of B has length at most s, then

∣{v}∪Nπ+(v)∣≤∣SB∣+∣∂+B∣≤3d sd−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite nearest-neighbor grid, the recursive coordinate-separator order, and its symbolic elimination graph.

[F1]

Recursive coordinate-separator ordering for two- and three-dimensional grids: Each box orders all child boxes before its separator; the separator is the union of its selected coordinate hyperplanes, and removing it leaves the child boxes.

[F2]

Filled edges are witnessed by paths through earlier eliminated vertices: A filled edge at the elimination of v is witnessed by an original grid walk whose internal vertices were eliminated before v.

[F3]

Structural graphs and ordered symmetric elimination: The vertices of each filled graph are exactly those not yet eliminated, and the ordering position strictly increases from a vertex to any later neighbor.

Proof

1.1F1inductionalgebra

The root box has empty exterior boundary. If B is a child of a box C, every grid neighbor just outside B is either in SC or just outside C: distinct child boxes are separated by the removed coordinate hyperplanes. Thus ∂+B⊆SC∪∂+C. Induction up the finite recursion tree, using that each ancestor separator is ordered after all vertices in its child boxes by [F1], shows that every vertex of ∂+B is ordered after every vertex of B.

2.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Fix v∈SB and a later filled neighbor w. If w∈B, then w cannot lie in a child box because every child is ordered before SB; hence w∈SB. If w∉B, [F2] gives an original grid walk from v to w whose internal vertices were eliminated before v. The first vertex of this walk outside B lies in ∂+B and, by step 1.1, is ordered after v. It therefore cannot be an internal vertex of the walk, so it must be its endpoint w. Hence w∈∂+B.

3.1step 2.1F1algebra

If the side lengths of B are m1,…,md≤s, each of its at most d coordinate hyperplanes contains at most sd−1 vertices, so ∣SB∣≤dsd−1. The exterior grid neighbors lie across the 2d faces, each with at most sd−1 vertices, so ∣∂+B∣≤2dsd−1. The containment in step 2.1 therefore gives the stated column-size bound.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Steps 2.1 and 3.1 establish both the filled-neighbor containment and its numerical bound for every separator vertex, including the terminal one-vertex case.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources