How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nested dissection gives the stated work and factor-storage bounds on regular grids
Statement
Let , , and . Identify the coordinate grid with the zero-based matrix indices by the lexicographic bijection in Recursive coordinate-separator ordering for two- and three-dimensional grids. Let be symmetric positive definite, with structural graph a subgraph of the -dimensional nearest-neighbor grid. Under the coordinate nested-dissection ordering, exact scalar multifrontal Cholesky has The storage is the number of allocated factor entries, including structural zeros, and excludes temporary contribution arrays. The bounds use the stated grid geometry; they assert no general-graph bound. For , there is one pivot and both work and factor storage are .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real symmetric positive-definite matrix with a grid-subgraph pattern, the recursive ordering, and exact scalar multifrontal Cholesky.
Recursive coordinate-separator ordering for two- and three-dimensional grids: Every box is separated by the union of its selected median coordinate hyperplanes; child boxes are ordered before that separator.
Nested-dissection grid fronts are bounded by a box separator and its exterior boundary: For the full grid and a vertex in the separator of a box of side at most , its factor-column size is at most .
Filled edges are witnessed by paths through earlier eliminated vertices: A filled edge at the elimination of a vertex is equivalent to an original-graph walk between its endpoints whose internal vertices were eliminated earlier.
Scalar multifrontal elimination is equivalent to sparse Cholesky with column-count costs: Exact factorization work is and symbolic factor storage is exactly .
Proof
If a box side has length , the median rule leaves each child side with length at most ; a side of length stays . Iterating gives side lengths at depth at most . There are at most boxes at that depth because each box has at most children. By depth , every side has length , so all remaining boxes are terminal. For , , hence .
If , the grid and its ordering contain one terminal pivot and its factor column contains only the diagonal. Hence for its unique vertex, and [F4] gives work and exactly one stored factor entry.
Let be the structural graph of and let be the full nearest-neighbor grid on the same vertices. They use the same coordinate ordering. If a pair is an edge in a filled graph of , [F3] supplies a witness walk in with internal vertices eliminated earlier; since is a subgraph of , the same walk witnesses that edge in the corresponding filled graph of . Thus every later filled neighbor in is also one in , and each subgraph column size is at most the full-grid column size. Fix a box at depth . Its separator has at most vertices by the union bound over its at most median hyperplanes; the terminal singleton satisfies the same bound. By [F2], each such pivot has full-grid column size at most , so the same bound holds for .
The factorization work contributed by one depth- box is therefore at most a constant depending only on times , using [F4]. Summing over at most boxes at each depth and using gives For , the geometric ratio is , so this is . For , the ratio is , so it is .
The storage contributed by one depth- box is at most a constant times , again by [F2] and [F4]. Summing over boxes and using gives For , there are equal-order terms, giving . For , the series is bounded by , giving .
When , gives and for . When , gives and . Thus steps 1.2, 2.1 and 2.2 give the displayed rates and the case. The proof used the coordinate-box and grid-boundary counts in [F1]–[F2] together with the fill containment proved in step 1.3, so it does not imply a bound for arbitrary graphs.
Depends on
- Recursive coordinate-separator ordering for two- and three-dimensional grids
- Filled edges are witnessed by paths through earlier eliminated vertices
- Nested-dissection grid fronts are bounded by a box separator and its exterior boundary
- Scalar multifrontal elimination is equivalent to sparse Cholesky with column-count costs
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jennifer Scott and Miroslav Tůma, Algorithms for Sparse Linear Systems, Chapter 8, §8.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Bindel, CS 5220, Lecture 16: Sparse Direct Solvers, slides 13–14 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Timothy A. Davis, Siva Rajamanickam, and Wissam M. Sid-Lakhdar, A survey of direct methods for sparse linear systems, §§8 and 11 (standard reference, not scraped)