How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ramification count from the derivative divisor
Statement
Let be a nonconstant meromorphic function on . For every the ramification count of the sphere map, including the centre regularisation, is Moreover, for every and every finite set of distinct sphere targets,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonconstant meromorphic on and .
Truncated and ramification counts: and ; sums over the points of local degree of the sphere map, and is its centre-regularized integral (Truncated value and ramification counts).
Counting conventions: is the multiplicity sum over the closed disc , and (Counting, chordal proximity and characteristic).
A zero of finite order factors locally as with (The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization).
At a pole of order , the function factors as with holomorphic, (Characterizations of poles).
All counts and are finite, and the regularized integrals are finite and continuous in (Well-definedness and radius conventions for Nevanlinna quantities, Truncated value and ramification counts).
Proof
(Finite target) Let be a point with and local degree . By [F3], with ; the product rule gives with , so has a zero of order exactly at . Thus contributes to and, when , exactly to ; when both contributions vanish.
(Poles) Let be a pole of order . By [F4], with holomorphic and , so has a pole of order and no zero at . Hence contributes to , to , and, when , exactly to .
(Disjointness for a target set) Let be a finite set of distinct sphere targets. For , is a sum of weights over points with and ; for distinct these point sets are disjoint, and each such is a ramification point of the sphere map with the same local degree , so its weight appears in . Hence and for every .
(Weight identity) Every ramification point of the sphere map is either a non-pole point with local degree , where step 1.1 makes the weight equal to the order of the zero of , or a pole of order , handled by step 1.2; conversely every zero of is a non-pole point of local degree with weight . Therefore, for every , both sides being finite sums of nonnegative weights.
(Integration) The identity of step 2.1 holds at as well, since is a right-continuous step function and the centre value is included in each term. Multiplying by the centre-regularisation is linear, so and all terms are finite by [F5].
(Integrate the inequality) Each ramification point contributes its nonnegative weight times when , while a point at contributes its weight times . For all these coefficients are nonnegative, so the pointwise inclusion of step 1.3 yields .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexandre Eremenko, Lectures on Nevanlinna Theory, §§4–6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Goldberg–Ostrovskii, Value Distribution of Meromorphic Functions (standard reference, not scraped)