Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ramification count from the derivative divisor

Statement

Let f be a nonconstant meromorphic function on C. For every r>0 the ramification count of the sphere map, including the centre regularisation, is N1(r,f)=N(r,0;f′)+2N(r,∞;f)−N(r,∞;f′). Moreover, for every r≥1 and every finite set A of distinct sphere targets, ∑a∈AN1(r,a;f)≤N1(r,f).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonconstant meromorphic f on C and r>0.

[F1]

Truncated and ramification counts: n(r,a;f)=nˉ(r,a;f)+n1(r,a;f) and N=N1(r,a;f)+Nˉ(r,a;f); n1(t,f) sums (mb−1) over the points of local degree mb≥2 of the sphere map, and N1(r,f) is its centre-regularized integral (Truncated value and ramification counts).

[F2]

Counting conventions: n(r,a;f) is the multiplicity sum over the closed disc ∣z∣≤r, and N(r,a;f)=n(0,a;f)log⁡r+∫0rn(t,a;f)−n(0,a;f)tdt (Counting, chordal proximity and characteristic).

[F3]

A zero of finite order m factors locally as (z−b)mh(z) with h(b)≠0 (The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization).

[F4]

At a pole p of order m, the function factors as (z−p)−mg with g holomorphic, g(p)≠0 (Characterizations of poles).

[F5]

All counts n(t,a;f) and n1(t,f) are finite, and the regularized integrals are finite and continuous in r (Well-definedness and radius conventions for Nevanlinna quantities, Truncated value and ramification counts).

Proof

technique · compare the local weights of the two sides point by point, then integrate and sum over disjoint target classes
1.1F1F2F3algebra

(Finite target) Let b be a point with f(b)=a∈C and local degree m≥1. By [F3], f−a=(z−b)mh with h(b)≠0; the product rule gives f′=(z−b)m−1(mh+(z−b)h′) with mh(b)≠0, so f′ has a zero of order exactly m−1 at b. Thus b contributes m−1 to n(t,0;f′) and, when m≥2, exactly m−1 to n1(t,a;f); when m=1 both contributions vanish.

1.2F1F2F4algebra

(Poles) Let p be a pole of order m≥1. By [F4], f=(z−p)−mg with g holomorphic and g(p)≠0, so f′=(z−p)−m−1(−mg+(z−p)g′) has a pole of order m+1 and no zero at p. Hence p contributes m to n(t,∞;f), 2m−(m+1)=m−1 to 2n(t,∞;f)−n(t,∞;f′), and, when m≥2, exactly m−1 to n1(t,∞;f).

1.3F1algebra

(Disjointness for a target set) Let A be a finite set of distinct sphere targets. For a∈A, n1(t,a;f) is a sum of weights mb−1 over points b with f(b)=a and mb≥2; for distinct a these point sets are disjoint, and each such b is a ramification point of the sphere map with the same local degree mb, so its weight appears in n1(t,f). Hence n1(t,a;f)≥0 and ∑a∈An1(t,a;f)≤n1(t,f) for every t>0.

2.1F1F5step 1.1step 1.2algebra

(Weight identity) Every ramification point of the sphere map is either a non-pole point with local degree m≥2, where step 1.1 makes the weight m−1 equal to the order of the zero of f′, or a pole of order m≥2, handled by step 1.2; conversely every zero of f′ is a non-pole point of local degree ν+1≥2 with weight ν. Therefore, for every t>0, n1(t,f)=n(t,0;f′)+2n(t,∞;f)−n(t,∞;f′), both sides being finite sums of nonnegative weights.

3.1F2F5step 2.1algebra

(Integration) The identity of step 2.1 holds at t=0 as well, since t↦n(t,⋅) is a right-continuous step function and the centre value is included in each term. Multiplying by the centre-regularisation n(0)log⁡r+∫0r( ⋅ −n(0))dtt is linear, so N1(r,f)=N(r,0;f′)+2N(r,∞;f)−N(r,∞;f′), and all terms are finite by [F5].

4.1F2F5step 1.3algebra∎

(Integrate the inequality) Each ramification point b≠0 contributes its nonnegative weight times log⁡(r/∣b∣) when ∣b∣≤r, while a point at 0 contributes its weight times log⁡r. For r≥1 all these coefficients are nonnegative, so the pointwise inclusion of step 1.3 yields ∑a∈AN1(r,a;f)≤N1(r,f).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources