Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A harmonic majorant of log^+|F| exists exactly when the radial log^+ means are bounded

Statement

Let F:D→C be holomorphic and put u:=log⁡+∣F∣. Then u has a harmonic majorant on D if and only if sup⁡0<r<1∫Tlog⁡+∣F(rζ)∣ dm(ζ)<+∞. The forward implication is immediate from the mean value property of a harmonic majorant; the converse is the Poisson-modification construction below.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A holomorphic function F on the unit disc D, the function u=log⁡+∣F∣=max⁡(log⁡∣F∣,0) with log⁡∣F(z)∣=−∞ at zeros of F, the number C:=sup⁡0<r<1∫Tu(rζ) dm(ζ) where it occurs, and the radii rn:=1−1/(n+1)↑1, n≥1 of the converse construction.

[L1]

If F≢0, then log⁡∣F∣ is subharmonic on D, and a finite maximum of subharmonic functions is subharmonic; subharmonic functions are upper semicontinuous by definition. Hence u=max⁡(log⁡∣F∣,0) is subharmonic and upper semicontinuous; for F≡0 the same holds because u=0. In both cases u≥0 everywhere (The logarithm of the modulus of a holomorphic function is subharmonic, Positive linear combinations and finite maxima preserve subharmonicity, Subharmonic functions on plane domains).

[L2]

Since u is upper semicontinuous on D, on every circle ∂D(0,r) the boundary data ur are upper semicontinuous and bounded above, its average is a well-defined element of [−∞,∞), and there exist boundary approximations ϕn↓u∣∂D(0,r) by continuous functions; the associated harmonic functions hn on D(0,r), continuous on D(0,r)‾, with boundary values ϕn exist uniquely by the Poisson boundary-value theorem, and the Poisson modification PD(0,r)u is PD(0,r)u=inf⁡nhn on D(0,r) (Upper semicontinuous functions are Borel and their circle averages are defined, Poisson modification on a compactly contained disc, The Poisson integral gives the unique continuous harmonic extension on the closed unit disc).

[L3]

The Poisson modification Hr:=PD(0,r)u is well defined, subharmonic on D, harmonic on D(0,r), satisfies Hr≥u on D and equals u outside D(0,r); moreover hn≥Hr≥u on D(0,r) for every boundary approximation (Poisson modification is subharmonic and majorizes the original function).

[L4]

Every plane harmonic function h satisfies the circle mean-value property h(a)=12π∫02πh(a+Reit) dt for every closed disc D(a,R)‾ in its domain (Plane harmonic functions satisfy the mean-value property, The circle and disc mean-value properties). For a continuous G on T one has ∫TG dm=∫[0,1)G(e2πit) dt=12π∫02πG(eis) ds, the last step by the linear change of variables s=2πt (The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral, The Poisson integral of a finite complex boundary measure, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions); in particular ∫Tu(rζ) dm(ζ)=12π∫02πu(reis) ds.

[L6]

(Minimum principle.) If k is harmonic on a bounded domain Ω and continuous on Ω‾, then inf⁡Ω‾k=inf⁡∂Ωk (Maximum and minimum principles for plane harmonic functions).

[L7]

(Harnack.) A positive harmonic function k on a neighbourhood of D(a,R)‾ satisfies k(z)≤R+ρR−ρk(a) for ∣z−a∣=ρ<R. If (kn) is an increasing sequence of harmonic functions on a domain Ω, then either kn→+∞ pointwise on Ω, or kn converges locally uniformly on Ω to a harmonic limit (Positive harmonic functions on a disc satisfy Harnack's inequality, An increasing harmonic sequence converges locally uniformly to a harmonic limit or diverges to +infinity).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL4algebra

Forward implication. Suppose h is a harmonic majorant of u on D, i.e. h is harmonic and h≥u. Fix 0<r<1; h is harmonic on a neighbourhood of D(0,r)‾, so integrating u(rζ)≤h(rζ) over T and applying the mean-value property in torus form gives ∫Tu(rζ) dm(ζ)≤∫Th(rζ) dm(ζ)=h(0)<+∞. Taking the supremum over r gives the stated bound, so the forward implication holds.

1.2givenL1

If F≡0, then u=0, its radial means are zero and the zero harmonic function is a majorant, so both conditions hold. Assume henceforth F≢0. The function u=log⁡+∣F∣ is subharmonic and nonnegative by [L1]. It is also continuous: F is continuous and x↦log⁡+x, with value 0 at x=0, is continuous on [0,∞).

2.1step 1.2L2L3L4algebra

The modifications and their values at the origin. Since u is continuous by step 1.2, in [L2] choose the specific boundary approximants ϕn=u∣∂D(0,r)+1/n. Their extensions are hn=Pr[u]+1/n, by uniqueness and linearity of the Dirichlet solution. Thus Hr=PD(0,r)u=Pr[u], continuous on the closed radius-r disc, harmonic inside, with boundary value u and Hr≥u by [L3]. Its mean value at the origin is Hr(0)=∫Tu(rζ) dm(ζ) by [L4].

3.1step 2.1L3L6algebra

Monotonicity in the radius. Let 0<r<ρ<1. On ∂D(0,r), Hr=u by step 2.1 whereas Hρ≥u by [L3]. Both are harmonic on D(0,r) and continuous on its closure, so their difference is nonnegative there by the minimum principle [L6]. Hence Hρ≥Hr on D(0,r).

3.2step 2.1L3L7algebra

Harnack bounds for the converse. Suppose C<∞. For ∣z∣<R<r<1, apply [L7] to Hr+ε on the radius-R disc and let ε↓0. Using step 2.1 gives 0≤Hr(z)≤(R+∣z∣)(R−∣z∣)−1C. Letting R↑r yields Hr(z)≤(r+∣z∣)(r−∣z∣)−1C. In particular, for any fixed ∣z∣<r0<1, these values are uniformly bounded for r≥r0, by (r0+∣z∣)(r0−∣z∣)−1C.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1L3L7algebra

Construction of the harmonic majorant. Put rn:=1−1/(n+1) for n≥1 and Hn:=Hrn. Fix R<1. For all n with rn>R, the function Hn is harmonic on a neighbourhood of D(0,R)‾ (namely on D(0,rn)), and by step 3.1 the sequence (Hn)n≥nR is increasing on D(0,R); it is bounded at the origin by C by step 2.1, so the increasing Harnack convergence principle [L7] provides a harmonic function H(R) on D(0,R) with Hn→H(R) locally uniformly there. For R<R′<1 the two limits H(R) and H(R′) agree on D(0,R) by uniqueness of pointwise limits of the same sequence, so there is a single harmonic function H on D with Hn→H locally uniformly on D. For each fixed z∈D and all n with rn>∣z∣ one has Hn(z)≥u(z) by [L3], and (Hn(z)) is eventually nondecreasing by step 3.1, so H(z)=lim⁡nHn(z)≥u(z). Hence H is a harmonic majorant of u on D.

5.1step 1.1step 1.2step 4.1L1∎

Assembly. If a harmonic majorant exists, step 1.1 bounds the radial u-means by its value at the origin, so the supremum is finite. Conversely, if the supremum is finite and equal to C, step 4.1 constructs a harmonic majorant H of u on D; the construction uses the subharmonicity and upper semicontinuity of u from step 1.2 together with the Poisson modifications, so both implications hold.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

105 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources