Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Log-integrability of the boundary values of a Hardy function

Statement

Let 0<p≤∞ and f∈Hp(D) with f≢0, with its nontangential boundary function f∗ supplied by Boundary values and log-integrability of Nevanlinna-class functions. Then log⁡∣f∗∣∈L1(T,m); equivalently ∫Tlog⁡∣f∗∣ dm>−∞. In particular f∗≠0 m-almost everywhere, and if f∗=0 on a set of positive m-measure then f≡0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, 0<p≤∞ and a nonzero f∈Hp(D).

[F1]

Hardy membership bounds the radial p-means for finite p and the interior supremum for p infinity. On the probability circle, log⁡+t≤tp/p for p>0. Uniformly bounded radial logarithmic means are equivalent to Nevanlinna membership under countable choice. (Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc, The Nevanlinna class on the disc, A harmonic majorant of log^+|F| exists exactly when the radial log^+ means are bounded, The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F2]

Under countable choice every nonzero Nevanlinna function has finite nonzero nontangential boundary values almost everywhere and an integrable boundary logarithm. (Boundary values and log-integrability of Nevanlinna-class functions)

[F3]

Fatou's lemma bounds the integral of a nonnegative pointwise limit by the limit inferior of the integrals. (Fatou's lemma)

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

If p<∞, [F1] gives sup⁡r∫log⁡+∣fr∣dm≤∥f∥Hpp/p<∞. If p=∞, log⁡+∣f∣≤log⁡+∥f∥∞, a constant harmonic majorant. In both cases f∈N(D) by [F1], including functions with origin zeros or no zeros; no zero enumeration or general Hardy boundary theorem is used.

2.1step 1.1F2F3algebra

Apply [F2] to the nonzero f. It gives the finite nontangential boundary function f∗ and log⁡∣f∗∣∈L1. For finite p, [F3] applied along radii to ∣fr∣p also gives ∫∣f∗∣pdm≤∥f∥Hpp; for p infinity, limits preserve the bound ∣f∗∣≤∥f∥∞. Thus the same boundary function is in the asserted Lp class under CC alone.

3.1step 2.1F1algebra

The positive boundary logarithmic part is integrable by the Lp bound and log⁡+t≤tp/p (or the uniform bound at infinity). Hence finiteness of the lower logarithmic integral is equivalent to integrability of its negative part, and so to absolute logarithmic integrability. Both are given by step 2.1.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

An integrable real logarithm is finite almost everywhere, so f∗≠0 almost everywhere. If the boundary function of a Hardy function vanishes on a positive-measure set, it cannot be nonzero by step 2.1; it must therefore be the zero function. This proves all original logarithmic and uniqueness claims under the existing CC class conventions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

87 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources