Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Inner-outer factorisation of a Hardy-space function

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let 0<p≤∞ and let f∈Hp(D) with f≢0, with boundary function f∗∈Lp and log⁡∣f∗∣∈L1. Then there exist a constant λ∈T, a Blaschke product B (the product of the normalized Blaschke factors of the zeros of f), a finite positive measure μ⊥m with associated singular inner function Sμ, and the outer function F:=[ ∣f∗∣ ], such that f=λ B Sμ F, with F∈Hp and ∥F∥Hp≤∥f∥Hp, and: B is determined by the zeros of f; F is the unique outer function with F(0)>0 and ∣F∗∣=∣f∗∣ a.e.; μ is the unique finite positive singular measure with Sμ(0)>0 and f/(BSμF) constant of modulus 1; and λ is that constant. The factorization is unique in this normalized sense.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, hence countable choice; 0<p≤∞ and f∈Hp(D), f≢0.

[L1]

Fatou boundary theorem and log-integrability: f∗∈Lp exists a.e., ∥f∗∥p=∥f∥Hp for p<∞ (with the L∞/weak-star version at p=∞), and log⁡∣f∗∣∈L1 with f∗≠0 a.e. (Fatou's boundary theorem for analytic Hardy spaces, Log-integrability of the boundary values of a Hardy function, Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc).

[L2]

Outer functions: F:=[ ∣f∗∣ ] is holomorphic, zero-free, F(0)=exp⁡(∫log⁡∣f∗∣)>0, ∣F∗∣=∣f∗∣ a.e., and F∈Hp with ∥F∥Hp≤∥f∗∥p=∥f∥Hp for p<∞ (and F∈H∞, ∣F∣≤∥f∗∥∞ for p=∞); an outer function with a prescribed boundary modulus and positive value at 0 is unique (Properties of outer functions, Inner, singular inner and outer functions).

[L3]

For finite p, Riesz factorization gives f=Bg with B the Blaschke product of the zeros of f, g zero-free holomorphic with ∥g∥Hp=∥f∥Hp; B is determined by the zeros of f, and ∣B∗∣=1 a.e. (F. Riesz factorization of a Hardy-space function, Blaschke factors and Blaschke products, Boundary values and zeros of a Blaschke product).

[L4]

Poisson-Jensen inequality: for the zero-free g∈Hp one has log⁡∣g(z)∣≤P[log⁡∣g∗∣](z) for every z, with equality when g is outer (Poisson-Jensen inequality for Hardy functions).

[L5]

Zero-free inner functions are singular inner functions: a holomorphic zero-free S with ∣S∣≤1 and ∣S∗∣=1 a.e. satisfies S=λ′Sμ with unique λ′∈T and unique finite positive μ⊥m, normalized by Sμ(0)>0 (Zero-free inner functions are unimodular multiples of singular inner functions).

[L6]

A holomorphic function of constant modulus is constant. In particular, a function holomorphic near a closed disc is bounded by its boundary maximum: an interior maximum exceeding the boundary maximum would force it to be constant (Local maximum modulus principle).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2L3

Put F:=[ ∣f∗∣ ]. By [L1] and [L2], it is holomorphic, zero-free and outer, with F(0)>0, ∣F∗∣=∣f∗∣ almost everywhere, F∈Hp and ∥F∥Hp≤∥f∥Hp. For finite p, [L3] gives f=Bg with g zero-free and ∥g∥Hp=∥f∥Hp. For p=∞, apply [L3] with exponent 1 (bounded f belongs to H1) to obtain the same holomorphic zero-free quotient g=f/B.

2.1step 1.1L1L3L6algebra

For p=∞, fix N and 0<ε<1. The holomorphic quotient gN=f/BN on every radius-R circle sufficiently near 1 satisfies ∣gN∣≤(1−ε)−1∥f∥∞, since BN is continuous on the closed disc with unit boundary modulus. The boundary maximum principle [L6] gives the same bound inside that circle. Let ε↓0, then N→∞ off the zeros of B, where gN→g; continuity extends the bound to those zeros. Thus ∥g∥∞≤∥f∥∞, and ∣B∣≤1 gives equality. In every case [L1] now supplies g∗, so f∗=B∗g∗ and ∣B∗∣=1 yield ∣g∗∣=∣f∗∣ almost everywhere.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L2L4L5algebra

The quotient is a zero-free inner function. Let S:=g/F, holomorphic and zero-free because both factors are. By [L4] applied to g, log⁡∣g∣≤P[log⁡∣g∗∣]=log⁡∣F∣ on D, since log⁡∣F∣=P[log⁡∣F∗∣]=P[log⁡∣g∗∣]; hence ∣S∣≤1. On the boundary, ∣S∗∣=∣g∗∣/∣F∗∣=1 a.e. By [L5] there are λ′∈T and a unique finite positive μ⊥m with S=λ′Sμ and Sμ(0)>0.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1L2L3L5L6

The factorization and its uniqueness. Substituting gives f=Bg=BFS=λ′ B Sμ F, which is the asserted factorization. Uniqueness: B is determined by the zeros of f by [L3]; ∣F∗∣=∣f∗∣ a.e., F outer and F(0)>0 determine F by [L2]; then S=f/(BF) is determined, and its representation λ′Sμ with Sμ(0)>0 is unique by [L5]; hence λ=λ′ is determined, and writing λ for λ′ gives the stated normalized factorization.

5.1step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Assembly. Steps 1.1, 3.1 and 4.1 produce the factorization f=λBSμF with the asserted bounds and prove that the normalized factors B,F,Sμ and the constant λ are uniquely determined.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

82 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources