Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Properties of outer functions

Statement

Let 0<p≤∞, let h≥0 be measurable on T with log⁡h∈L1(T,m) and h∈Lp(T,m), and let [h] be the outer function of Inner, singular inner and outer functions. Then:

(i) [h] is holomorphic and zero-free on D with [h](0)=exp⁡(∫log⁡h dm)>0, and for p<∞ ∣[h](z)∣p≤P[hp](z)(z∈D); hence [h]∈Hp(D) with ∥[h]∥Hp≤∥h∥p, while for p=∞ one has ∣[h]∣≤∥h∥∞ and [h]∈H∞(D).

(ii) ∣[h]∗(ζ)∣=h(ζ) for m-almost every ζ∈T.

(iii) If h1=h2 m-almost everywhere then [h1]=[h2].

(iv) If g∈Hp(D) satisfies g≢0, ∣g∗∣=h m-almost everywhere and the outer equality log⁡∣g(z)∣=P[log⁡h](z) for all z∈D, then g=eiγ[h] for some γ∈R; in particular the outer function with prescribed boundary modulus is determined up to a unimodular constant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice and a nonnegative measurable h on T with log⁡h∈L1(T,m) and h∈Lp(T,m), and the outer function [h]=exp⁡L, L(z):=∫TK(z,ζ)log⁡h(ζ) dm(ζ).

[L1]

K(z,ζ)=(ζ+z)/(ζ−z) satisfies Re⁡K(z,ζ)=P(z,ζ), the Poisson kernel; P(z,⋅) is a probability density on T with ∫P(z,ζ)dm(ζ)=1, and for fixed z the integrals ∫∣K(z,ζ)∣ ∣f(ζ)∣dm(ζ) are finite for f∈L1 with ∫∣K(z,ζ)∣∣f∣dm≤1+∣z∣1−∣z∣∥f∥1 (Inner, singular inner and outer functions, The Poisson kernel on the unit disc, The Poisson kernel is positive, has total mass one, and concentrates at a boundary point, The Poisson integral of a finite complex boundary measure, Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm).

[L2]

The expansion K(z,ζ)=1+2∑n≥1znζ−n converges absolutely and locally uniformly on ∣z∣<1, ∣ζ∣=1, so with cn:=∫ζ−nlog⁡h dm the series L(z)=∫log⁡h dm+2∑n≥1cnzn has ∣cn∣≤∥log⁡h∥1 and converges locally uniformly; its sum is holomorphic by the published power-series theorem, and exp⁡ of a holomorphic function is holomorphic and never zero, with ∣ew∣=eRe⁡w (A complex power series converges absolutely and uniformly on every closed subdisc strictly inside its disc of convergence, A complex function is holomorphic if and only if it is analytic, The complex exponential by its power series, The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself, exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0).

[L3]

Jensen's inequality for the expectation with respect to the probability measure P(z,ζ)dm(ζ) and the convex exponential: e∫P(z,ζ) t(ζ) dm(ζ)≤∫P(z,ζ)et(ζ) dm(ζ) for real t with both t and et integrable against this probability measure (Jensen's inequality for expectation, Jensen's integral inequality for a probability measure).

[L4]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative and Fubini's theorem for L1 functions on the product of the probability space (T,m) with itself, and the translation invariance of m making ∫P(rζ,η) dm(ζ)=1 for every fixed η (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product, The Poisson kernel is positive, has total mass one, and concentrates at a boundary point, The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral).

[L5]

Under countable choice the Poisson integral of an L1 datum converges to that datum nontangentially almost everywhere. A nonzero Hardy function is in N and therefore has finite nontangential boundary limits under CC. (Fatou limits for Poisson extensions of L1 boundary data, Boundary values and log-integrability of Nevanlinna-class functions, The Nevanlinna class on the disc, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[L6]

A holomorphic function of constant modulus on a domain is constant (maximum principle), and ∣uv∣=∣u∣∣v∣ (Local maximum modulus principle, Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL2algebra

Holomorphy, zero-freeness and the value at the origin. By [L2] the function L is holomorphic on D with L(0)=∫log⁡h dm∈R, so [h]=eL is holomorphic and zero-free with [h](0)=e∫log⁡h dm>0 (finite because log⁡h∈L1).

2.1step 1.1L1L2L3algebra

The pointwise bound. Let p<∞ and fix z∈D. Since Re⁡L(z)=∫P(z,ζ)log⁡h(ζ) dm(ζ) by [L1], put t:=plog⁡h, choosing a finite real representative on the null exceptional set. Both t and et=hp are integrable against P(z,ζ)dm(ζ) because log⁡h∈L1, h∈Lp, and the fixed kernel is bounded by [L1]. Jensen's inequality [L3] therefore gives ∣[h](z)∣p=epRe⁡L(z)=e∫P(z,ζ) plog⁡h(ζ) dm(ζ)≤∫TP(z,ζ)h(ζ)p dm(ζ)=P[hp](z). For p=∞, log⁡h≤log⁡∥h∥∞ m-almost everywhere (with ∥h∥∞>0 because log⁡h∈L1), so Re⁡L(z)=∫Plog⁡h dm≤log⁡∥h∥∞ and ∣[h](z)∣≤∥h∥∞.

2.2step 1.1L6algebra

Uniqueness up to a unimodular constant. Assume g∈Hp, g≢0, ∣g∗∣=h a.e. and log⁡∣g(z)∣=P[log⁡h](z) for all z. Then log⁡∣g∣=log⁡∣[h]∣ on D by step 1.1 and [L1], so the holomorphic zero-free function g/[h] has constant modulus 1; by [L6] it is a constant of modulus one, that is, g=eiγ[h] for some γ∈R.

3.1step 2.1L4algebra

Membership in Hp. For p<∞ and 0<r<1, integrating the bound of step 2.1 over the circle and applying Tonelli's theorem [L4] to the nonnegative integrand gives ∫T∣[h](rζ)∣p dm(ζ)≤∫T(∫TP(rζ,η) dm(ζ))h(η)p dm(η)=∥h∥pp, because the inner integral equals the unit mass of the kernel by translation invariance. Taking the supremum over r gives [h]∈Hp(D) with ∥[h]∥Hp≤∥h∥p; for p=∞ step 2.1 gives [h]∈H∞ with ∥[h]∥∞≤∥h∥∞.

4.1step 3.1L1L5algebra

Boundary modulus. Since log⁡∣[h]∣=Re⁡L=P[log⁡h] by [L1], the harmonic Fatou theorem for the L1 datum log⁡h gives log⁡∣[h](z)∣→log⁡h(ζ) as z→ζ within every cone, at m-almost every ζ. By step 3.1, [h]∈Hp, so by [L5] it has nontangential limits [h]∗ m-almost everywhere; at every point where both statements hold, taking moduli gives ∣[h]∗(ζ)∣=h(ζ). This proves (ii), and (iii) is immediate from the definition of [h] as an integral against dm.

5.1step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1step 2.2∎

Assembly. Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 give (i), step 4.1 gives (ii) and (iii), and step 2.2 gives (iv). All four clauses are proved under the stated hypotheses.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Inner, singular inner and outer functions.

Dependency tree · two levels

150 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources