How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Smirnov class is the class of quotients by outer bounded functions
Statement
Let be holomorphic on with . Then if and only if there are with outer (equivalently and for all ) such that . Moreover may be chosen with and , and the representation is not unique: may be replaced by for any bounded outer .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice and a holomorphic on ; in the forward direction its boundary function with .
The Smirnov class consists of the with for all , where is the a.e. boundary function with (The Smirnov class on the disc, Boundary values and log-integrability of Nevanlinna-class functions).
Bounded quotients of Nevanlinna functions: if with zero-free then is holomorphic and lies in ; and for nonzero , with (The Nevanlinna class is a bounded quotient class, Poisson-Jensen inequality for Hardy functions, The Nevanlinna class on the disc).
If has , the outer function is holomorphic and zero-free, with and . In particular, for in , satisfies , hence . Products of bounded outer functions remain bounded and outer, by adding their integrable boundary logarithms and their Poisson log-modulus identities. (Properties of outer functions, Inner, singular inner and outer functions)
A zero-free factor multiplies numerator and denominator without changing the quotient; products of functions are in (The Nevanlinna class is a bounded quotient class).
Proof
Quotients by outer bounded functions lie in . Assume with , outer and . By [L2], is holomorphic and in , and , while outer-ness of gives ; subtracting the two displays gives, using linearity of the Poisson integral, with the identification a.e. and by [L2]. Hence by [L1].
A Smirnov function is such a quotient. Assume , so by [L1] and . Put , an function, and . By [L3], is outer with and , so and is outer. Let , holomorphic on . Then because pointwise, and the Poisson integral of a function is . Hence and , while with outer, , .
Non-uniqueness and normalization. If with and outer, and is outer, both products are bounded holomorphic by [L5]. The denominator is outer by [L3] and is zero-free. Therefore is another representation with an outer denominator. Taking, for example, the constant outer multiplier gives a distinct pair, so the representation is not unique. Step 2.1 already constructs a denominator with and . A merely zero-free bounded multiplier preserves the quotient but need not preserve an outer denominator.
Assembly. Step 1.1 proves the backward implication, steps 2.1 and 3.1 the forward implication with the stated normalization, and step 3.1 records the non-uniqueness. This proves the equivalence of membership in with the quotient representation.
Depends on
- The Smirnov class on the disc
- The Nevanlinna class on the disc
- The Nevanlinna class is a bounded quotient class
- Boundary values and log-integrability of Nevanlinna-class functions
- Poisson-Jensen inequality for Hardy functions
- Properties of outer functions
- Inner, singular inner and outer functions
- Harmonic conjugates exist on homologically simply connected plane domains
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Cited to discharge well-definedness by The Smirnov class on the disc.
Dependency tree · two levels
104 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. B. Garnett, Bounded Analytic Functions, revised first edition, Chapter II §5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- R. K. Srivastava, Lecture Notes on Hardy Spaces (MA650, IIT Guwahati), §6.3 (standard reference, not scraped)