Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

F. Riesz factorization of a Hardy-space function

Statement

Let 0<p<∞, let f∈Hp(D) with f≢0, let (an)n≥1 be its zero sequence repeated with multiplicity and let B be the associated Blaschke product. Then g:=f/B extends holomorphically to D (removable singularities at the an), g has no zero in D, ∣f(z)∣≤∣g(z)∣ for every z∈D, and g∈Hp(D),∥g∥Hp=∥f∥Hp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A function f∈Hp(D) with 0<p<∞ and f≢0, its zero sequence (an) with multiplicity, the Blaschke product B, the partial products BN=∏n≤Nban and the quotients gN:=f/BN, together with g:=f/B where it is defined.

[L1]

The classes Hp(D) and their (quasi-)norms are defined by the suprema of radial Lp means, and ∥fr∥Lp≤∥f∥Hp for every 0≤r<1; the radial means of a holomorphic function are nondecreasing in the radius (Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc, Radial p-means of a holomorphic function are nondecreasing).

[L2]

The zero sequence of a nonzero Hp function satisfies the Blaschke condition ∑n(1−∣an∣)<+∞; hence B is a Blaschke product with ∣B∣≤1 and ∣ba∣≤1, and each finite product BN is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of the closed unit disc with ∣BN(ζ)∣=1 for every ζ∈T (The zero set of a Hardy function satisfies the Blaschke condition, Blaschke factors and Blaschke products, Boundary values and zeros of a Blaschke product).

[L3]

At a zero a occurring m≥1 times in the zero sequence, f has a zero of order at least m and B a zero of exactly order m, so g and each gN are holomorphic off the zero set and bounded near each an; a bounded holomorphic function on a punctured disc extends holomorphically across the puncture (Characterizations of removable singularities, Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives, Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions).

[L4]

∣BN(z)∣≤1 on D, so ∣gN∣=∣f∣/∣BN∣≥∣f∣; the sequence (∣gN∣)N≥1 is nondecreasing at each point and converges to ∣g∣ (Blaschke factors and Blaschke products).

[L5]

Increasing sequences of nonnegative measurable functions may be integrated to the limit: if 0≤u1≤u2≤⋯ and uN↑u pointwise, then ∫uN dm↑∫u dm (Monotone convergence for the integral).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2L3

The Blaschke condition. By the Hp clause of [L2] applied to f∈Hp, the liminf hypothesis holds and ∑n(1−∣an∣)<+∞; hence B is a well-defined Blaschke product with ∣B∣≤1, each BN extends to the closed disc with ∣BN∣=1 on T, and each gN=f/BN is holomorphic on D by [L3].

1.2givenL1L2algebra

Bounding the N-th quotient. Fix 0<r<R<1, 0<ε<1 and N. By [L1] applied to the holomorphic function gN, ∫T∣gN(rζ)∣p dm(ζ)≤∫T∣gN(Rζ)∣p dm(ζ)=∫T∣f(Rζ)∣p∣BN(Rζ)∣p dm(ζ). Since BN is continuous on D‾ with ∣BN∣=1 on T by [L2], there is ρ<1 with ∣BN(Rζ)∣≥1−ε for all ζ∈T and all R∈(ρ,1); for such R, using [L1] again, ∫T∣gN(rζ)∣p dm(ζ)≤(1−ε)−p∫T∣f(Rζ)∣p dm(ζ)≤(1−ε)−p∥f∥Hpp.

2.1step 1.1L2L3L4algebra

The quotient. The function g=f/B is holomorphic off the zeros of B; at each a occurring m times, g is bounded near a and hence extends holomorphically by [L3], and g(a)≠0 because the order of the zero of f at a equals the multiplicity m with which a is listed. Thus g is holomorphic and zero-free on D, and ∣f∣≤∣g∣ because ∣B∣≤1.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1L1L4L5algebra

Passing to the limits in the correct order. Fix N and r<1. In step 1.2 choose R close enough to 1 for this N and ε, then let ε↓0. This gives ∫∣gN(rζ)∣pdm≤∥f∥Hpp, independently of N. The identities gN=baN+1gN+1 and ∣ba∣≤1 show that ∣gN∣p increases with N; off the zeros of B, gN=f/BN→f/B=g. A fixed circle contains only finitely many zeros, a null set, so monotone convergence [L5] gives ∫∣g(rζ)∣pdm≤∥f∥Hpp. Taking the supremum over r yields ∥g∥Hp≤∥f∥Hp. For finite or empty zero lists, the products stabilize, and the same argument gives B=1, g=f when the list is empty.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1L1∎

Equality and assembly. Since ∣f∣≤∣g∣ pointwise by step 2.1, the radial means satisfy ∫T∣f(rζ)∣p dm≤∫T∣g(rζ)∣p dm for every r, so ∥f∥Hp≤∥g∥Hp by [L1]; combined with step 3.1 this gives ∥g∥Hp=∥f∥Hp with g∈Hp(D). Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 together prove all the asserted clauses.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources