Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Radial p-means of a holomorphic function are nondecreasing

Statement

Let f:D→C be holomorphic and let 0<p<∞. For all 0<r≤R<1, ∫T∣f(rζ)∣p dm(ζ)≤∫T∣f(Rζ)∣p dm(ζ). Consequently, for f∈Hp(D) the nondecreasing radial means satisfy ∥f∥Hpp=lim⁡r↑1∫T∣f(rζ)∣p dm(ζ), so that ∥f∥Hp=lim⁡r↑1∥fr∥Lp. Moreover, for 0<p<q≤∞ one has Hq(D)⊆Hp(D) and ∥f∥Hp≤∥f∥Hq for every f∈Hq(D).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A holomorphic function f on D, an exponent 0<p<∞, radii 0<r≤R<1, and the function u:=∣f∣p.

[L1]

If f is not identically zero, then u=∣f∣p is subharmonic on D; f is smooth, hence continuous, so u is continuous on D (Positive powers of the modulus of a holomorphic function are subharmonic, Holomorphic functions are real analytic and smooth in their two real coordinates).

[L2]

For a subharmonic function u on D and a disc D(0,R)⋐D, the Poisson modification PD(0,R)u is harmonic on D(0,R) and satisfies PD(0,R)u≥u on D, where it is defined by boundary approximations ϕn↓u∣∂D(0,R) and the unique harmonic extensions hn of ϕn to the disc; when u is continuous on D(0,R)‾ one may take ϕn:=u∣∂D(0,R)+1/(n+1) for n≥0. If H is the Poisson extension of the continuous boundary datum u∣∂D(0,R), uniqueness gives hn=H+1/(n+1), so PD(0,R)u=H inside the disc (Poisson modification on a compactly contained disc, Poisson modification is subharmonic and majorizes the original function, The Poisson integral gives the unique continuous harmonic extension on the closed unit disc).

[L3]

For continuous boundary data ϕ on the circle of radius R, the function z↦∫TP(z/R,η) ϕ(Rη) dm(η)(∣z∣<R) is the unique harmonic extension of ϕ to D(0,R), continuous on the closed disc, where P is the Poisson kernel of the unit disc (The Poisson integral gives the unique continuous harmonic extension on the closed unit disc, The Poisson kernel on the unit disc, The Poisson integral of a finite complex boundary measure). In particular its value at z=0 is ∫Tϕ(Rη) dm(η), because P(0,η)=1.

[L4]

A harmonic function w on a neighbourhood of the closed disc D(0,r)‾ satisfies w(0)=∫Tw(rζ) dm(ζ), the circle mean-value property in the torus normalization (Plane harmonic functions satisfy the mean-value property, The circle and disc mean-value properties, The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral).

[L5]

On the probability space (T,m), for 0<p<q<∞ and measurable g one has (∫T∣g∣p dm)1/p≤(∫T∣g∣q dm)1/q. The case of an infinite right-hand side is immediate. Otherwise, for p≥1 use Lyapunov's moment inequality on a probability space; for p<1, apply Jensen's inequality for expectation to the integrable variable X=∣g∣q and the convex function φ(t)=−tp/q on [0,∞). Its composition is integrable because Xp/q≤1+X, and Jensen gives ∫∣g∣p dm≤(∫∣g∣q dm)p/q. For q=∞, integrating the almost-everywhere bound ∣g∣p≤∥g∥∞p gives the same comparison for every p>0.

[L6]

The classes Hp(D), 0<p≤∞, and their (quasi-)norms are defined by the suprema of the radial Lp means over 0≤r<1 (Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1

Reduction and subharmonicity. If f≡0, then both sides of the asserted inequality vanish and the further claims are immediate, so assume f is not identically zero. Then u=∣f∣p is subharmonic on D and continuous, by [L1].

1.2L5

The Lp comparison. Let 0<p<q<∞ and let g be measurable on T. By [L5], ∥g∥Lp≤∥g∥Lq; and if q=∞, ∥g∥Lp≤∥g∥∞.

2.1step 1.1L2L3

The modification is the Poisson extension of the boundary data. Fix 0<R<1. By [L2] and continuity of u on D(0,R)‾ (a compact subset of D), the Poisson modification h:=PD(0,R)u is harmonic on D(0,R), satisfies h≥u on D, and is the Poisson extension of u∣∂D(0,R); hence by [L3], h(z)=∫TP(z/R,η) u(Rη) dm(η)(∣z∣<R),h(0)=∫Tu(Rη) dm(η).

2.2step 1.2L6algebra

Containment of the classes. Let 0<p<q≤∞ and f∈Hq(D); every radius r∈[0,1) satisfies ∥fr∥Lp≤∥fr∥Lq by step 1.2, and ∥fr∥Lq≤∥f∥Hq by the definition of the supremum when q<∞, while ∥fr∥Lq≤∥f∥Hq for q=∞ as well because ∣fr∣≤∥f∥H∞ pointwise. Taking suprema over r gives ∥f∥Hp≤∥f∥Hq<+∞, so f∈Hp(D) and the containment Hq(D)⊆Hp(D) holds with the asserted norm comparison.

3.1step 2.1L4algebra

Monotonicity of the means. Let 0<r≤R<1. The case r=R is an equality of the two integrals, so assume r<R. Step 2.1 gives h≥u on D(0,r) and h(0)=∫Tu(Rη) dm(η); since h is harmonic on D(0,R), hence on a neighbourhood of the closed disc D(0,r)‾ for r<R, integrating the inequality u(rζ)≤h(rζ) over T against m and applying the mean value property [L4] gives ∫T∣f(rζ)∣p dm(ζ)=∫Tu(rζ) dm(ζ)≤∫Th(rζ) dm(ζ)=h(0)=∫T∣f(Rη)∣p dm(η).

4.1step 1.1step 3.1L6algebra

The supremum is the limit. Let f∈Hp(D). Continuity of u=∣f∣p at 0 gives sup⁡ζ∈T∣u(rζ)−u(0)∣→0 as r↓0. Thus the mean inequality of step 3.1 also holds when the smaller radius is 0. The map r↦∫T∣f(rζ)∣p dm(ζ) is therefore nondecreasing on [0,1) and bounded by ∥f∥Hpp<+∞ by [L6]. A nondecreasing bounded real function on [0,1) has supremum equal to its limit as r↑1, so sup⁡0≤r<1(∫T∣f(rζ)∣p dm(ζ))1/p=lim⁡r↑1(∫T∣f(rζ)∣p dm(ζ))1/p, that is, ∥f∥Hp=lim⁡r↑1∥fr∥Lp.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1step 2.2∎

Assembly. The mean inequality is step 3.1, the limit description of the norm is step 4.1, and the containment together with the norm comparison is step 2.2; all were proved under the given hypotheses.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc.

Dependency tree · two levels

103 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources