Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The zero set of a Hardy function satisfies the Blaschke condition

Statement

Let f be holomorphic on D with f≢0, and suppose that lim inf⁡r↑1∫Tlog⁡∣f(rζ)∣ dm(ζ)<+∞, where log⁡∣f∣=−∞ at the zeros of f. This hypothesis holds in particular for every f∈Hp(D), 0<p≤∞: the logarithmic Jensen inequality and Radial p-means of a holomorphic function are nondecreasing give ∫Tlog⁡∣fr∣ dm≤log⁡∥f∥Hp for 0<p<∞ and ∫Tlog⁡∣fr∣ dm≤log⁡∥f∥∞ for p=∞. Let (an)n≥1 be the zeros of f in D repeated according to multiplicity. Then f has finite vanishing order m≥0 at the origin (with m=0 when f(0)≠0), and the nonzero zeros satisfy ∑n: an≠0log⁡1∣an∣<+∞,hence∑n≥1(1−∣an∣)<+∞. (The second inequality uses log⁡(1/x)≥1−x for 0<x≤1. The finite vanishing order at the origin contributes finitely many terms equal to 1 to the second sum and does not affect convergence of the nonzero part.)

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A holomorphic function f≢0 on D satisfying the displayed liminf hypothesis, its zero sequence (an) repeated with multiplicity, and (where used) the exponent p∈(0,∞].

[L1]

If f≢0, then f has a finite vanishing order at the origin: there are an integer m≥0 and a holomorphic g:D→C with f(z)=zmg(z) for all z∈D and g(0)≠0; the zeros of f are then the origin together with the zeros of g, with multiplicities, and f(r⋅) is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of the closed unit disc for every 0<r<1 (A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain, Identity theorem for holomorphic functions, Characterizations of removable singularities, Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions).

[L2]

Jensen's formula on a disc: if F is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of {∣z∣≤R}, F(0)≠0, and F has no zero on ∣z∣=R, then log⁡∣F(0)∣=12π∫02πlog⁡∣F(Reit)∣ dt−∑∣a∣<Rlog⁡R∣a∣, the sum over the zeros of F in ∣z∣<R with multiplicity; for a radius meeting boundary zeros the identity is recovered by taking r↑R through radii that avoid zeros on ∣z∣=r (Jensen's formula on a disc).

[L3]

Logarithmic Jensen inequality. For a measurable Y≥0 on the probability space (T,m) with ∫TY dm<+∞, one has ∫Tlog⁡Y dm≤log⁡∫TY dm, with both sides in [−∞,∞) and log⁡0:=−∞. Indeed, for gn:=max⁡(log⁡Y,−n) the convex Jensen inequality applied to gn and the convex function exp⁡ gives exp⁡(∫gn dm)≤∫exp⁡(gn) dm≤∫Y dm+e−n, and passing to the limit in n gives the claim (Jensen's integral inequality for a probability measure, Jensen's inequality for expectation, The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral).

[L4]

The classes Hp(D) and their norms are defined by suprema of radial Lp means; for f∈Hp, 0<p<∞, one has ∥fr∥Lp≤∥f∥Hp for every 0≤r<1 by definition of the supremum, and for p=∞, ∣f(z)∣≤∥f∥H∞ for all z (Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc, Radial p-means of a holomorphic function are nondecreasing).

[L5]

For 0<x≤1 one has log⁡(1/x)≥1−x; and for a sequence of nonnegative terms increasing to a limit, the sum of the limits is the limit of the sums (monotone convergence for series) (Monotone convergence for the integral).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1algebra

Reduction at the origin. By [L1] write f(z)=zmg(z) with m≥0, g holomorphic on D and g(0)≠0; this m is the finite order of the zero of f at the origin, and f has no other zeros at the origin. For 0<r<1, ∫Tlog⁡∣f(rζ)∣ dm(ζ)=mlog⁡r+∫Tlog⁡∣g(rζ)∣ dm(ζ) (for m=0 this is the identity; for m≥1 it holds because log⁡∣rmζm∣=mlog⁡r is constant on the circle). Hence lim inf⁡r↑1∫Tlog⁡∣g(rζ)∣ dm(ζ)=lim inf⁡r↑1∫Tlog⁡∣f(rζ)∣ dm(ζ)<+∞, because mlog⁡r→0.

1.2L3algebra

The logarithmic Jensen inequality at each radius. Let F be holomorphic on a neighbourhood of the closed unit disc and not identically zero. Applying [L3] to Y:=∣F∣p with 0<p<∞, and noting ∫T∣F∣p dm=∥F∥Lpp<+∞ because F is continuous, gives ∫Tlog⁡∣F∣ dm=1p∫Tlog⁡∣F∣p dm≤1plog⁡∫T∣F∣p dm=log⁡∥F∥Lp. For p=∞, log⁡∣F∣≤log⁡∥F∥∞ pointwise, so ∫Tlog⁡∣F∣ dm≤log⁡∥F∥∞.

1.3givenL1L2algebra

Jensen's formula for g. Fix 0<r<1 such that no ∣an∣ equals r, and apply [L2] with R=1 to F:=g(r ⋅ ), whose zeros in ∣z∣<1 are the points an/r for those zeros an of f (equivalently of g) with 0<∣an∣<r: −∑0<∣an∣<rlog⁡r∣an∣=log⁡∣g(0)∣−∫Tlog⁡∣g(rζ)∣ dm(ζ).

2.1step 1.2L4

The Hp clause. Let f∈Hp(D). If p=∞, then for every 0<r<1 step 1.2 applied to fr and [L4] give ∫Tlog⁡∣f(rζ)∣ dm(ζ)≤log⁡∥fr∥∞≤log⁡∥f∥H∞<+∞, so the liminf hypothesis holds (when ∥f∥H∞=0 then f≡0, excluded). If 0<p<∞, the same steps give ∫Tlog⁡∣f(rζ)∣ dm(ζ)≤log⁡∥fr∥Lp≤log⁡∥f∥Hp<+∞.

2.2step 1.3L1L2algebra

Good radii and their limiting means. Jensen's formula in step 1.3, together with its boundary-zero limiting form in [L2], says that M(r):=∫log⁡∣g(rζ)∣dm=log⁡∣g(0)∣+∑0<∣an∣<rlog⁡(r/∣an∣) for every 0<r<1; a zero on the radius contributes zero in that limiting identity. Thus M(r) is nondecreasing. There are finitely many zero moduli in any closed subdisc, so a strictly increasing sequence of radii avoiding them and tending to 1 can be chosen recursively, for instance from the rational radii in successive intervals tending to 1. Monotonicity makes its means tend to lim inf⁡r↑1M(r). Along these radii, ∑0<∣an∣<rjlog⁡(rj/∣an∣)=M(rj)−log⁡∣g(0)∣ by step 1.3.

3.1step 2.2L1L5algebra

The Blaschke condition. In the identity of step 2.2 the left-hand side Sj:=∑0<∣an∣<rjlog⁡(rj/∣an∣) has nonnegative terms that increase with j and eventually include every nonzero zero, so Sj increases to S:=∑n:an≠0log⁡(1/∣an∣)∈[0,+∞]. By the choice of the radii, the right-hand side converges to L:=lim inf⁡r↑1∫Tlog⁡∣g(rζ)∣ dm(ζ)−log⁡∣g(0)∣, and L<+∞ by step 1.1; since Sj≥0 for every j, L≥0 as well, so L∈[0,+∞). As limits of the same identity, S=L<+∞. Since log⁡(1/x)≥1−x for 0<x≤1, also ∑n:an≠0(1−∣an∣)≤∑n:an≠0log⁡1∣an∣<+∞, and the zero at the origin contributes the finite amount m to the second sum; hence ∑n≥1(1−∣an∣)<+∞.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.3step 3.1∎

Assembly. Step 1.1 produces the finite order m of the zero at the origin and transfers the liminf hypothesis from f to g; step 2.1 verifies the hypothesis for Hp functions; steps 1.3–3.1 convert Jensen's formula for the dilated functions g(r ⋅ ) into convergence of the zero sum ∑log⁡(1/∣an∣) over the nonzero zeros, and then into the Blaschke condition ∑(1−∣an∣)<+∞.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

107 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources