How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The zero set of a Hardy function satisfies the Blaschke condition
Statement
Let be holomorphic on with , and suppose that where at the zeros of . This hypothesis holds in particular for every , : the logarithmic Jensen inequality and Radial p-means of a holomorphic function are nondecreasing give for and for . Let be the zeros of in repeated according to multiplicity. Then has finite vanishing order at the origin (with when ), and the nonzero zeros satisfy (The second inequality uses for . The finite vanishing order at the origin contributes finitely many terms equal to to the second sum and does not affect convergence of the nonzero part.)
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A holomorphic function on satisfying the displayed liminf hypothesis, its zero sequence repeated with multiplicity, and (where used) the exponent .
If , then has a finite vanishing order at the origin: there are an integer and a holomorphic with for all and ; the zeros of are then the origin together with the zeros of , with multiplicities, and is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of the closed unit disc for every (A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain, Identity theorem for holomorphic functions, Characterizations of removable singularities, Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions).
Jensen's formula on a disc: if is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of , , and has no zero on , then , the sum over the zeros of in with multiplicity; for a radius meeting boundary zeros the identity is recovered by taking through radii that avoid zeros on (Jensen's formula on a disc).
Logarithmic Jensen inequality. For a measurable on the probability space with , one has , with both sides in and . Indeed, for the convex Jensen inequality applied to and the convex function gives , and passing to the limit in gives the claim (Jensen's integral inequality for a probability measure, Jensen's inequality for expectation, The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral).
The classes and their norms are defined by suprema of radial means; for , , one has for every by definition of the supremum, and for , for all (Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc, Radial p-means of a holomorphic function are nondecreasing).
For one has ; and for a sequence of nonnegative terms increasing to a limit, the sum of the limits is the limit of the sums (monotone convergence for series) (Monotone convergence for the integral).
Proof
Reduction at the origin. By [L1] write with , holomorphic on and ; this is the finite order of the zero of at the origin, and has no other zeros at the origin. For , (for this is the identity; for it holds because is constant on the circle). Hence , because .
The logarithmic Jensen inequality at each radius. Let be holomorphic on a neighbourhood of the closed unit disc and not identically zero. Applying [L3] to with , and noting because is continuous, gives For , pointwise, so .
Jensen's formula for . Fix such that no equals , and apply [L2] with to , whose zeros in are the points for those zeros of (equivalently of ) with :
The clause. Let . If , then for every step 1.2 applied to and [L4] give , so the liminf hypothesis holds (when then , excluded). If , the same steps give .
Good radii and their limiting means. Jensen's formula in step 1.3, together with its boundary-zero limiting form in [L2], says that for every ; a zero on the radius contributes zero in that limiting identity. Thus is nondecreasing. There are finitely many zero moduli in any closed subdisc, so a strictly increasing sequence of radii avoiding them and tending to can be chosen recursively, for instance from the rational radii in successive intervals tending to . Monotonicity makes its means tend to . Along these radii, by step 1.3.
The Blaschke condition. In the identity of step 2.2 the left-hand side has nonnegative terms that increase with and eventually include every nonzero zero, so increases to . By the choice of the radii, the right-hand side converges to , and by step 1.1; since for every , as well, so . As limits of the same identity, . Since for , also , and the zero at the origin contributes the finite amount to the second sum; hence .
Assembly. Step 1.1 produces the finite order of the zero at the origin and transfers the liminf hypothesis from to ; step 2.1 verifies the hypothesis for functions; steps 1.3–3.1 convert Jensen's formula for the dilated functions into convergence of the zero sum over the nonzero zeros, and then into the Blaschke condition .
Depends on
- Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc
- Radial p-means of a holomorphic function are nondecreasing
- Jensen's formula on a disc
- Jensen's integral inequality for a probability measure
- Jensen's inequality for expectation
- Identity theorem for holomorphic functions
- A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain
- Characterizations of removable singularities
- Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions
- The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral
- Monotone convergence for the integral
Used by
- A divergent Blaschke sum: no nonzero Hardy function has these zeros Counterexample
- Blaschke factors and Blaschke products Definition
- An infinite Blaschke product whose zeros accumulate at the boundary Example
- Blaschke factorization of a Nevanlinna-class function Lemma
- Boundary values and zeros of a Blaschke product Theorem
- F. Riesz factorization of a Hardy-space function Theorem
- Zero-free inner functions are unimodular multiples of singular inner functions Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
107 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. K. Srivastava, Lecture Notes on Hardy Spaces (MA650, IIT Guwahati), §5.6, §5.8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. B. Garnett, Bounded Analytic Functions, revised first edition, Chapter II §2 (standard reference, not scraped)