Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Jensen's formula on a disc

Statement

Let f be holomorphic on a neighbourhood of the closed disc {zR}, assume f(0)0, and let a1,,aN be the zeros of f in z<R, counted with multiplicity. If f has no zero on z=R, then

logf(0)=12π02πlogf(Reit)dtk=1NlogRak.

For a radius meeting boundary zeros, the same identity is recovered by taking rR through radii that avoid zeros on z=r.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A holomorphic function f on a neighbourhood of the closed disc {zR}, with f(0)0.

[F1]

Cauchy's integral formula on a circle recovers the value at the centre (Cauchy's integral formula on a circle compactly contained in a disc of holomorphy).

[F2]

A zero of multiplicity m can be factored as (za)m times a holomorphic nonvanishing factor (The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization).

[F3]

A nowhere-zero holomorphic function on a disc has a holomorphic logarithm, because discs are star-shaped and homologically simply connected (Star-shaped plane domains are homologically simply connected, A nonvanishing holomorphic function on a homologically simply connected domain has a holomorphic logarithm).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Assume first that f has no zero on z=R. Because the closed disc is compact, f has only finitely many zeros in z<R; applying [F2] repeatedly gives f(z)=k=1N(zak)g(z) on a neighbourhood of the closed disc, where g is holomorphic and zero-free there.

F2givenalgebra
2.1

By [F3], choose a holomorphic logarithm L of g on z<R. Applying [F1] to L on the circle z=R and taking real parts yields logg(0)=12π02πlogg(Reit)dt.

F1F3step 1.1algebra
3.1

For each zero ak with ak<R, write Reitak=Reit(1akR1eit). The factor 1akR1z is zero-free on the closed unit disc, so the same argument as in step 2.1 shows 12π02πlog1akR1eitdt=0; hence 12π02πlogReitakdt=logR.

F1F3step 2.1algebra
4.1

Taking logarithms of the factorization in step 1.1 on the boundary circle and averaging, step 2.1 gives the mean for g and step 3.1 contributes one logR for each zero. Rearranging yields logf(0)=12π02πlogf(Reit)dtk=1Nlog(R/ak).

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra
5.1

If f has zeros on z=R, apply step 4.1 to radii r<R with no zero on z=r; as rR, the zero list inside z<r stabilizes except when r crosses one of finitely many zero moduli, and the boundary integral converges to the stated radial limit.

step 4.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources