Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Composition at points in the domain of a rational group action

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be algebraically closed, G a smooth connected algebraic group, and X an integral separated variety. A rational action means a rational map α:G×X⇢X satisfying the action identities as rational maps, whose induced maps αg are birational automorphisms for every g∈G(k). Write g⋅x only when the total map α is defined at (g,x). If h⋅x and g⋅(h⋅x) are defined, then gh⋅x is defined and equals g⋅(h⋅x).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Rational maps to separated schemes agree wherever both representatives are defined; their representatives glue to a maximal open domain. The graph of a morphism to a separated scheme is closed. (Rational maps of integral finite-type schemes)

[F2]

Group multiplication and inverse are morphisms. (Abelian varieties over a field)

[F3]

Closed rational points are dense in every reduced finite-type scheme over an algebraically closed field. (Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal)

Proof

Given: G, X, α, and the two defined values in the statement.

1.1F1F2F3givenconstruct

Products here are integral: for affine integral coordinate rings A,B, write two alleged zero-divisor factors in A⊗kB using finite linearly independent coefficients in B. Specializing at each closed point of Spec⁡A makes one factor zero because B is a domain. The two vanishing loci are closed and cover the irreducible Spec⁡A by [F3], so one factor is zero. This proves A⊗kB is a domain. Put T=G×G×X, a(u,v,z)=α(v,z), and b(u,v,z)=α(u,a(u,v,z)). The simultaneous domain N of a and b is open and contains (g,h,x). The rational map c(u,v,z)=α(uv,z) equals b by the action identity. The closure of the graph of (a,b,c) is contained in the closed locus where its last two coordinates coincide. Over N it is exactly the graph of (a,b,b): the latter is closed by [F1], contains the dense generic graph there, and that graph is dense in it because N is integral. Consequently c has the regular representative b on N.

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct∎

The morphism s:G×X→T given by s(t,z)=(th−1,h,z) is a section of (u,v,z)↦(uv,z). Its inverse image of N is an open neighbourhood of (gh,x). On that neighbourhood b∘s is a morphism. It agrees with α on the dense open where α itself is defined, since there c∘s=α; this dense open intersects the neighbourhood because G×X is integral. Thus it represents α and extends its domain to (gh,x). Its value is b(g,h,x)=g⋅(h⋅x), as claimed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources