Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The theorem of the cube for an abelian variety

Statement

Assume AC and DC. Let A be an abelian variety over any field k, with identity e. On A3, write mI(x1,x2,x3)=∑i∈Ixi. For every invertible sheaf L on A there is an isomorphism m123∗L⊗m1∗L⊗m2∗L⊗m3∗L≅m12∗L⊗m13∗L⊗m23∗L. More generally, an invertible sheaf M on A×A×A trivial on e×A×A and A×e×A, and trivial on A×A×{z} for one point z of the third factor, is trivial. The triviality on the last fibre is over its residue field. The assertion includes arbitrary characteristic and imperfect fields.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A is proper, smooth, geometrically integral and rationally pointed; it is commutative and projective under AC. (Abelian varieties over a field, A proper geometrically connected group variety is commutative, Every abelian variety over a field is projective)

[F2]

A proper geometrically integral rationally pointed variety has only scalar global functions. Finite affine Čech covers compute quasi-coherent cohomology. (Global functions on proper integral schemes form a finite extension of the base field, Cech cohomology computes quasi-coherent cohomology on a separated scheme)

[F3]

A proper flat coherent family over a Noetherian affine base has a bounded finite projective cohomology complex in nonnegative degrees compatible with arbitrary base change, locally finite free. If the degree-zero fibre map is surjective, pushforward is locally free and commutes with base change near that point. These suppliers assume AC and DC. (Finite projective complex for proper flat coherent cohomology, Cohomology and base change for proper flat coherent families)

[F4]

The maximal-ideal completion of a Noetherian local ring is faithfully flat, under AC. (Jacobson-adic completion is faithfully flat)

Proof

Given: AC, DC, A/k as above, and an invertible sheaf M satisfying the three stated triviality conditions.

1.1F1F2algebra

Put X=A×kA, Z=A, and p:X×Z→Z. Products and field extensions of smooth geometrically integral varieties are geometrically integral: geometric irreducibility of the product follows since the projection is open with irreducible fibres, and its reducedness follows from smoothness. They remain proper. Thus H0(XK,O)=K for every extension K/k by [F2]. In fact H0(X×Spec⁡B,O)=B for every k-algebra B: the equalizer of sections on a finite affine cover and its intersections tensors with B over the field k, preserving its kernel. The same holds for A. For any extension K/k, use the double Čech resolution for the covers by Ui×AK and AK×Uj, where the Ui are affine. Its term at the intersection UI×UJ is Γ(UI,O)⊗KΓ(UJ,O), so its global-section total complex is the tensor total complex of the two affine Čech complexes. The augmented Čech resolution in each direction is exact on stalks (a cover member containing the point supplies its contraction), and all double intersections are affine; thus this total complex computes the cohomology of XK. Splitting each complex of K-vector spaces into its cohomology and two-term contractible summands gives H1(XK,O)=H1(AK,O)⊕H1(AK,O). Restriction to AK×e and e×AK is precisely projection onto these two summands, since H0(AK,O)=K and H1(Spec⁡K,O)=0. In particular the joint restriction is injective.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

The set T={t∈Z:Mt≅OXκ(t)} is closed. Indeed on a proper integral fibre, Mt is trivial exactly when both Mt and Mt−1 have nonzero global sections: their product is a nonzero scalar, since neither section vanishes at the generic point, so they are mutually inverse up to that scalar. On each affine neighbourhood in Z, [F3] represents the two cohomologies by complexes K and K′ in degrees at least zero, with finite free terms after shrinking. Consequently h0(Mt)=dim⁡ker⁡(dK0⊗κ(t)). The condition that this dimension is at least one is the closed determinantal condition rank⁡(dK0⊗κ(t))≤rank⁡K0−1; the analogous condition for K′ is also closed. Their intersection is T, so these local descriptions prove the claim globally. The given fibre shows T≠∅.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1constructalgebra

Fix t∈T, let (R,m)=OZ,t and κ=R/m, and put Rr=R/mr. We prove M trivial on XRr for every r≥1. The case r=1 is the definition of T. If a trivialization exists at r, choose affine local frames at r+1 lifting it. Their transitions lie in 1+OXκ⊗κIr, where Ir=mr/mr+1 and Ir2=0. Multiplication of these units adds their coefficients; the obstruction to changing frames to agreeing frames is therefore their Čech class in H1(Xκ,O)⊗κIr. Its restrictions to both axes vanish, since M is trivial there. The possible change of an axis trivialization is multiplication by a unit of Rr by step 1.1, and every such unit lifts to Rr+1; thus it does not change this vanishing assertion. The injectivity established in step 1.1, tensored with the vector space Ir, makes the obstruction zero. Changing frames by a Čech coboundary gives a trivialization at r+1. Normalize every trivializing section to value 1 at (e,e) using a fixed frame of M along this section of p; this frame exists because of the axis triviality. Global functions on XRr are Rr by step 1.1, so the normalized trivializing section is unique. The sections just constructed are consequently compatible as r varies.

4.1F3F4step 3.1algebra

Apply [F3] over R and write K for the finite projective complex for M. Its nonnegative degrees give H0(K⊗Rr)=ker⁡(K0⊗Rr→K1⊗Rr). Taking inverse limits, which commute with kernels, turns the compatible sections of step 3.1 into an element of H0(K⊗R^) whose residue is a generator of H0(Mt). Here finite projective modules commute with completion, since they are direct summands of finite free modules. Flatness in [F4] gives H0(K⊗R^)=H0(K)⊗RR^, and R^/mR^=κ. Therefore the original map H0(K)⊗Rκ→H0(Mt) is surjective. Localizing cohomology identifies it with the fibre map on an affine neighbourhood of t. By [F3] a section lifting this generator exists after shrinking that neighbourhood. The zero locus of this section in X×Z misses the entire fibre over t; its image is closed because p is proper. Removing that image produces an open neighbourhood U of t on which the section nowhere vanishes, so M∣X×U is trivial. This proves T open, with actual trivializations, including the infinitesimal parameter directions.

5.1F1step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1

Since Z=A is connected, the nonempty open and closed subset T is Z. The local trivializations in step 4.1 show N=p∗M is invertible and the evaluation p∗N→M is an isomorphism: on each such U both assertions reduce to p∗O=OU from step 1.1. Pulling back along (e,e,id⁡Z) identifies N with the trivial sheaf, by the axis hypothesis. Thus M is trivial. This proves the stated specialized see-saw and cube assertion without importing a Picard scheme or an unproved triviality-locus theorem.

6.1F1step 5.1algebra∎

For the displayed identity, take M=m123∗L⊗m1∗L⊗m2∗L⊗m3∗L⊗m12∗L−1⊗m13∗L−1⊗m23∗L−1. On each coordinate face with one coordinate equal to e, all nonconstant factors cancel. The remaining constant factor is e∗L, a one-dimensional k-vector space and hence a trivial invertible sheaf on that face. Thus step 5.1 applies with third-coordinate point e and gives M≅OA3, equivalently the asserted identity. AC and DC enter through [F1]–[F4]; no characteristic restriction was used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

136 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources