How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nonbacktracking covariance high moments and an independent coarse norm bound
Statement
Let be one infinite real iid array with , and , and let . Put , and . Take the centered slow truncations of the upper-left blocks, orient each with rows and columns, and divide by , obtaining . For each fixed integer , define by summing the products of the entries of along all paths of length , subject to every pair of vertices two positions apart being unequal. Its row and column endpoints are included in these exclusions. Then almost surely In particular, for the original untruncated , almost surely .
Statement references
Bai and Silverstein, Chapters 3 and 5 (complete book); the argument below supplies its own counting and probability estimates.
Facts & Assumptions
Nested iid fourth-moment truncation and uniform diagonal control supplies eventual truncation equality, the uniform third-moment bound, slow threshold, negligible mean matrix and diagonal laws.
Markov's inequality and first Borel–Cantelli are Markov's inequality for random variables and First Borel-Cantelli lemma for events.
Real spectral theorem: a self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional real inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis and The operator norm is 0 on the zero domain and otherwise equals the largest singular value, attained at a right-singular vector identify the Hermitian norm and bound its even powers by their trace.
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Apply F1 to the original nested rectangular array and, as necessary, its transpose. Orient the centered truncated matrix with rows and columns, , and divide by . In this proof the original sequence index is , , , and . These dimensions are comparable to ; all probability series below are summed over . Enlarge the slow truncation threshold by a fixed factor to bound the centered entries by with , . F1 gives independent centered entries, variance at most one, and for . Define and the restricted matrices as in the statement. The same arguments hold if the orientation changes infinitely often.
Fix . Set , with integer chosen so that and ; for example . Since , is polylogarithmic. Reversing each admissible path exchanges its endpoints and preserves its real weight, so is real symmetric. Thus its even-power trace bounds . Expand into closed alternating walks of length , split into consecutive nonbacktracking blocks of length . Bound absolute expectations termwise. Any edge appearing exactly once vanishes by centering and independence.
Canonicalize row and column labels separately by order of first appearance. Innovations lead to a previously unvisited vertex and form a spanning tree of the visited vertices. Let be their number, so vertices are visited. Classify the second occurrence of each innovation edge as T3; all other noninnovation occurrences are T4. There are exactly T3 occurrences and T4 occurrences. A T4 class is a distinct unoriented edge supporting at least one T4 occurrence; let be their number. Then , and implies . Every innovation edge appears at least twice.
Moment bound. An innovation edge of multiplicity two contributes at most one. An innovation edge of multiplicity contributes at most . A noninnovation edge of multiplicity contributes at most , a deliberately weaker bound valid for . Consequently the product is bounded by . This follows by summing exponents: an innovation edge contributes , while a noninnovation edge contributes ; the resulting total is .
Coding bound, including a replacement for Lemmas 5.5–5.6. At each time keep the forest of innovation edges seen exactly once. At a T3 step the endpoint is selected among the neighbors of the current vertex in . Call the step regular if there are at least two such neighbors; otherwise its endpoint is forced. Let be the number of nonempty edge components of not containing the current vertex. An innovation leaves unchanged. A regular T3 step increases by one (deleting its edge leaves a nonempty component on the departure side); an irregular T3 leaves unchanged. A T4 step leaves unchanged and changes by at most one. Since starts and ends empty, there are at most regular T3 steps.
At any time the degree of the current vertex in is at most . To prove this, delete that vertex from the full innovation tree. Each incident open edge determines one branch. Except for the possible branch containing the initial vertex, the prefix walk crosses the cut of such a branch an even number of times. Its innovation-tree edge has been crossed exactly once, so some T4 class must cross this cut with odd multiplicity. A fixed T4 edge can join at most two branches at the deleted vertex. There are classes, proving the bound. This parity argument allows classes whose first T4 occurrence is in the future by harmless overcounting.
Given innovation and T3 positions, choose the T4 edge classes in at most ways and assign all T4 positions to classes in at most ways. Innovation endpoints are forced by canonical order. At any T3 position there are at most choices, and at most positions can be regular. A decision tree of depth at most with branching at most has at most leaves (pad shorter branches with forced dummy choices); no separate selection of regular positions is required. T4 endpoints are forced by current vertex and chosen class, or the code is invalid. Thus the remaining coding factor is at most . Interpret .
In block , let count adjacent innovation/noninnovation pairs. Such a pair must have a NEW noninnovation edge: its departure vertex was just introduced, and immediate reversal is prohibited inside a block. It is therefore the first T4 occurrence of its class. Consequently . Innovation runs have at most components; their alternating row/column innovations differ in number by at most one each. If count row and column innovations, then and . Hence .
For given , innovation positions in block have at most patterns: a binary string with transitions has this count, by specifying its alternating run endpoints, including a possible terminal run. Their product is at most . There are at most choices of the . Once innovation positions are fixed, T3 positions have at most choices. Labelings contribute at most , for .
Combining all factors, with , gives where . This derivation uses absolute values and requires no symmetry of the real entry law.
Uniformly in , . Set , so eventually . For , Indeed split the exponential into two halves, sum one geometric factor, and maximize for . For the finite inner sum is exactly one. Thus, after enlarging a fixed constant, let ; the trace is at most
For the final inequality, : map a -subset of to the -subset formed by the adjacent pairs ; these are disjoint and recover the original subset. The sum is consequently bounded by the binomial expansion with nonnegative coefficients. Since , the last display equals .
For , Markov's inequality gives eventually, which is summable since . Borel–Cantelli and a countable sequence of prove the stated fixed-length norm bound. This completes all graph estimates locally.
In particular, . Since with and by F1, . On the event of eventual truncation equality, the original oriented normalized matrix differs from by the constant matrix with every entry . Its norm is by F1, since a constant matrix of entry maps a vector to times its coordinate sum in every row and has norm . Thus the original normalized matrices have an eventual finite norm bound. Changing the normalization from to multiplies this norm by the bounded factor . This proves the independent coarse bound.
Depends on
- Nested iid fourth-moment truncation and uniform diagonal control
- First Borel-Cantelli lemma for events
- Markov's inequality for random variables
- Real spectral theorem: a self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional real inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis
- The operator norm is 0 on the zero domain and otherwise equals the largest singular value, attained at a right-singular vector
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.