Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonbacktracking covariance high moments and an independent coarse norm bound

Statement

Let (ξij)i,j≥1 be one infinite real iid array with Eξ11=0, Eξ112=1 and E∣ξ11∣4<∞, and let ph/h→γ∈(0,∞). Put Nh=max⁡(h,ph), mh=min⁡(h,ph) and yh=mh/Nh→y:=min⁡(γ,γ−1). Take the centered slow truncations of the upper-left h×ph blocks, orient each with mh rows and Nh columns, and divide by Nh, obtaining Yh. For each fixed integer ℓ≥1, define Th,ℓ by summing the products of the entries of Yh,YhT,…,Yh,YhT along all paths of length 2ℓ, subject to every pair of vertices two positions apart being unequal. Its row and column endpoints are included in these exclusions. Then almost surely lim sup⁡h∥Th,ℓ∥op≤(2ℓ+1)(ℓ+1)y(ℓ−1)/2. In particular, for the original untruncated Xh=(ξij)i≤h,j≤ph, almost surely lim sup⁡h∥Xh/h∥op<∞.

Statement references

Bai and Silverstein, Chapters 3 and 5 (complete book); the argument below supplies its own counting and probability estimates.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Nested iid fourth-moment truncation and uniform diagonal control supplies eventual truncation equality, the uniform third-moment bound, slow threshold, negligible mean matrix and diagonal laws.

[F2]

Markov's inequality and first Borel–Cantelli are Markov's inequality for random variables and First Borel-Cantelli lemma for events.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

1.1F1givenconstruct

Apply F1 to the original nested rectangular array and, as necessary, its transpose. Orient the centered truncated matrix with p rows and n columns, p≤n, and divide by n. In this proof the original sequence index is h, n=Nh=max⁡(h,ph), p=min⁡(h,ph), and yn=p/n→y∈(0,1]. These dimensions are comparable to h; all probability series below are summed over h. Enlarge the slow truncation threshold by a fixed factor to bound the centered entries by Ln=δnn with δn≥1/log⁡(n+2), δn→0. F1 gives independent centered entries, variance at most one, and E∣x∣q≤CLnq−3 for q≥3. Define Y=(xij/n) and the restricted matrices Tℓ as in the statement. The same arguments hold if the orientation changes infinitely often.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Fix ℓ≥1. Set N=4mℓ, with integer m chosen so that m/log⁡n→∞ and δn(m/log⁡n)2→0; for example m=⌈log⁡n δn−1/8⌉. Since δn≥1/log⁡n, N is polylogarithmic. Reversing each admissible path exchanges its endpoints and preserves its real weight, so Tℓ is real symmetric. Thus its even-power trace bounds ∥Tℓ∥2m. Expand Etr⁡Tℓ2m into closed alternating walks of length N, split into 2m consecutive nonbacktracking blocks of length 2ℓ. Bound absolute expectations termwise. Any edge appearing exactly once vanishes by centering and independence.

3.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebrastep 2.1

Canonicalize row and column labels separately by order of first appearance. Innovations lead to a previously unvisited vertex and form a spanning tree of the visited vertices. Let k be their number, so k+1 vertices are visited. Classify the second occurrence of each innovation edge as T3; all other noninnovation occurrences are T4. There are exactly k T3 occurrences and d=N−2k T4 occurrences. A T4 class is a distinct unoriented edge supporting at least one T4 occurrence; let t be their number. Then 0≤t≤d, and t=0 implies d=0. Every innovation edge appears at least twice.

4.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebrastep 3.1

Moment bound. An innovation edge of multiplicity two contributes at most one. An innovation edge of multiplicity q≥3 contributes at most CLnq−3. A noninnovation edge of multiplicity q≥2 contributes at most CLnq−1, a deliberately weaker bound valid for Ln≥1. Consequently the product is bounded by CtLnd−t. This follows by summing exponents: an innovation edge contributes q−2−1q≥3, while a noninnovation edge contributes q−1; the resulting total is N−2k−t.

5.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebrastep 4.1

Coding bound, including a replacement for Lemmas 5.5–5.6. At each time keep the forest F of innovation edges seen exactly once. At a T3 step the endpoint is selected among the neighbors of the current vertex in F. Call the step regular if there are at least two such neighbors; otherwise its endpoint is forced. Let Q be the number of nonempty edge components of F not containing the current vertex. An innovation leaves Q unchanged. A regular T3 step increases Q by one (deleting its edge leaves a nonempty component on the departure side); an irregular T3 leaves Q unchanged. A T4 step leaves F unchanged and changes Q by at most one. Since F starts and ends empty, there are at most d regular T3 steps.

6.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebrastep 5.1

At any time the degree of the current vertex in F is at most 2t+1. To prove this, delete that vertex from the full innovation tree. Each incident open edge determines one branch. Except for the possible branch containing the initial vertex, the prefix walk crosses the cut of such a branch an even number of times. Its innovation-tree edge has been crossed exactly once, so some T4 class must cross this cut with odd multiplicity. A fixed T4 edge can join at most two branches at the deleted vertex. There are t classes, proving the bound. This parity argument allows classes whose first T4 occurrence is in the future by harmless overcounting.

7.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebrastep 6.1

Given innovation and T3 positions, choose the t T4 edge classes in at most (k+1)2t ways and assign all T4 positions to classes in at most td ways. Innovation endpoints are forced by canonical order. At any T3 position there are at most 2t+1 choices, and at most d positions can be regular. A decision tree of depth at most d with branching at most 2t+1 has at most (2t+1)d leaves (pad shorter branches with forced dummy choices); no separate selection of regular positions is required. T4 endpoints are forced by current vertex and chosen class, or the code is invalid. Thus the remaining coding factor is at most (k+1)2ttd(2t+1)d≤(k+1)2t3d(t+1)2d. Interpret 00=1.

8.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebrastep 7.1

In block b, let ab count adjacent innovation/noninnovation pairs. Such a pair must have a NEW noninnovation edge: its departure vertex was just introduced, and immediate reversal is prohibited inside a block. It is therefore the first T4 occurrence of its class. Consequently ∑ab≤t. Innovation runs have at most ab+1 components; their alternating row/column innovations differ in number by at most one each. If r,s count row and column innovations, then k=r+s and ∣r−s∣≤t+2m. Hence r≥(k−t−2m)/2.

9.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebrastep 8.1

For given ab, innovation positions in block b have at most (2ℓ+12ab+1) patterns: a binary string with ab transitions 1→0 has this count, by specifying its alternating run endpoints, including a possible terminal run. Their product is at most (2ℓ+1)2t+2m. There are at most (ℓ+1)2m choices of the ab. Once innovation positions are fixed, T3 positions have at most (N−kk) choices. Labelings contribute at most pr+1ns=nk+1ynr+1≤nk+1yn(k−t−2m)/2, for 0<yn≤1.

10.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebrastep 9.1

Combining all factors, with A=(2ℓ+1)(ℓ+1), gives Etr⁡Tℓ2m≤nA2myn−m∑1≤k≤N/2(N−kk)ynk/2δnN−2k3N−2k∑t=0N−2kqn,kt(t+1)2(N−2k), where qn,k=C(2ℓ+1)2(k+1)2/(nynδn). This derivation uses absolute values and requires no symmetry of the real entry law.

11.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebrastep 10.1

Uniformly in k, qn,k=n−1/2+o(1). Set a=−log⁡qn,k, so eventually (log⁡n)/3≤a≤log⁡n. For d≥1, ∑t≥0e−at(t+1)2d≤2ea/2max⁡{1,(4d/(ae))2d}≤2n [C1max⁡{1,N/log⁡n}2]d. Indeed split the exponential into two halves, sum one geometric factor, and maximize u2de−au/2 for u=t+1≥1. For d=0 the finite inner sum is exactly one. Thus, after enlarging a fixed constant, let εn=C2δnmax⁡{1,N/log⁡n}2→0; the trace is at most 2n2A2myn−m∑k(N−kk)ynk/2εnN−2k≤2n2A2myn−m(yn1/4+εn)N.

12.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebrastep 11.1

For the final inequality, (N−kk)≤(N2k): map a k-subset of {1,…,N−k} to the 2k-subset formed by the adjacent pairs (bi+i−1,bi+i); these are disjoint and recover the original subset. The sum is consequently bounded by the binomial expansion with nonnegative coefficients. Since N=4mℓ, the last display equals 2n2[Ayn(ℓ−1)/2]2m(1+o(1))N.

13.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebrastep 12.1

For η>Ay(ℓ−1)/2, Markov's inequality gives P(∥Tℓ∥≥η)≤2n2e−cm eventually, which is summable since m/log⁡n→∞. Borel–Cantelli and a countable sequence of η prove the stated fixed-length norm bound. This completes all graph estimates locally.

14.1F1step 1.1F2algebrastep 13.1∎

In particular, lim sup⁡∥T1∥≤6. Since YYT=T1+D with D=diag⁡(YYT) and ∥D−I∥→0 by F1, lim sup⁡∥Y∥2≤7. On the event of eventual truncation equality, the original oriented normalized matrix differs from Y by the constant matrix with every entry μh/Nh. Its norm is p ∣μh∣→0 by F1, since a constant p×n matrix of entry a maps a vector to a times its coordinate sum in every row and has norm ∣a∣pn. Thus the original normalized matrices have an eventual finite norm bound. Changing the normalization from Nh to h multiplies this norm by the bounded factor Nh/h. This proves the independent coarse bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources