How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Formal recursion for solved analytic normal equations
Statement
For and analytic near zero, the scalar zero-data equation has a unique formal series with for . For this also holds for finite systems . No convergence is asserted. Analytic data reduce to this statement by subtraction of their normal Taylor polynomial.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The analytic scalar solved normal equation and allowed jets stated above, with zero Cauchy data; or its finite first-order system version. General analytic data are handled by subtraction.
Composition of formal series with zero-constant inner arguments is defined coefficientwise. (Operations preserving coefficient majorisation).
Subtracting the finite normal Taylor polynomial bijectively reduces analytic data to zero data. (Subtracting analytic Cauchy jets).
Proof
Write with . The initial conditions force . Consequently each allowed jet has a factor and in particular zero total constant term. F1 makes substitution into F a well-defined formal series in x,t.
For , equating coefficients gives . In the right side, a coefficient of t-degree at most q in an allowed jet uses only with , hence . Tangential differentiation changes x-degrees but never t-degree. Replacing u by its truncation through that index therefore leaves the coefficient unchanged.
Starting at q=0, step 2.1 defines each new by division by the nonzero integer . Every right-side coefficient is thus eventually matched, proving existence of a formal solution. The same recursion forces every coefficient of any other formal solution, proving uniqueness. For m=1 and a finite vector, apply the same recursion simultaneously to all components; no next coefficient of any component occurs on the right. F2 supplies the analytic-data reduction.
Source notes
Gantumur, §4 Theorem 18 proof, equations (41)–(43), printed p. 9; higher-order recursion is expanded locally.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gantumur, Math 580 Lecture Notes 2: The Cauchy-Kovalevskaya Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)