How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Normalized type-A Soergel bimodules are self-dual and have length degree bounds
Statement
Over or , let be the normalized indecomposable bimodule classified by its top support. With right dual , one has . Its right reduction has degrees only in , all congruent to modulo two, and the two extremal dimensions are one. Hence its reduced graded dimensions are symmetric. Every Bott-Samelson word has a graded perfect symmetric invariant trace form. These assertions assume neither the Kazhdan-Lusztig character conjecture nor hard Lefschetz.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The coordinate type-A realization, the normalized indecomposables and shifts as in Indecomposable type-A Soergel bimodules are classified by their normalized top support, and finite right-free bimodules over .
The normalized is the unique indecomposable summand with the graph of a reduced word, independent of the word. Its top quotient is rank one with generator degree , by the image equality and its top layer (Indecomposable type-A Soergel bimodules are classified by their normalized top support, Type-A top support layers are controlled by reflection localization).
In , the right basis , has degrees , and satisfies and ; the generator is finite free on either side (The real type-A Soergel category by scalar extension, Soergel generators and Bott–Samelson products are finite free on both sides).
Proof
The unit has the perfect multiplication form. If a right-free bimodule has an invariant form, put and in and define the induced form by , , and . Extend on a right basis by right bilinearity. The relation of [F2] and the identity verify that these formulas agree for arbitrary , and that left multiplication is self-adjoint. Symmetry follows from symmetry of the preceding form. If are dual right bases for that form, the pairing between bases and has matrix , using , and has determinant one. Thus perfection is preserved. Iteration yields a perfect symmetric invariant form on every word, exactly its successive rank-one trace multiplication form.
For finite right-free modules the graded double-dual evaluation is an isomorphism, so is an involutive contravariant equivalence and takes indecomposables to indecomposables. The invariant perfect word form of step 1.1 identifies a word with its right dual. Generic graph support is unchanged by this duality: in a right basis left multiplication matrices transpose under , so their simultaneous eigencharacters, and hence the graph labels after passing to the polynomial fraction field, are unchanged. A right-free summand has precisely the support closure of those graph labels. Therefore is an indecomposable summand with the graph of the same reduced word. Uniqueness in [F1] identifies it with with no shift.
A word of length has a homogeneous right basis given by tensor products of the two basis elements in [F2]; its generator degrees lie between and and have parity . Right reduction preserves a split direct-sum decomposition. Since is an unshifted summand of its reduced word of length , its reduction has these same bounds and parity. The word's bottom degree is the single -tensor. The balanced evaluation of that word on its top graph, obtained by successively twisting the tensor-slot polynomials by the successive prefix permutations, sends this -tensor to . It factors through the rank-one top quotient, and is an isomorphism onto because both generators have degree . All other summands have no support; consequently the projection of the bottom tensor into is nonzero. Its bottom dimension is therefore one.
Right duality reverses the degrees of the finite homogeneous basis after reduction. The unshifted duality from step 2.1 therefore makes the reduced dimensions symmetric and gives top dimension one from the bottom dimension in step 3.1. The perfect trace forms, duality, degree bounds, parity and extremal dimensions have now all been established locally.
Depends on
Used by
- The reduced Soergel module and the dominant Lefschetz operator Definition
- The trace, the invariant intersection form on Bott-Samelson bimodules and its reduction Definition
- Embedding theorem: local intersection forms are isometric to primitive Lefschetz forms Lemma
- Indecomposable labels, characters and filtration ranks agree after real scalar extension Lemma
- Invariant forms on an indecomposable Soergel bimodule are unique up to scalar, non-degenerate, and agree with the restricted Bott-Samelson form Lemma
- Radical quotients, minimal complexes and perverse filtrations in the Soergel category Lemma
- Hard Lefschetz for the deformed operator on Bₓ Bₛ, in the three cases Theorem
- Indecomposable projectives correspond to indecomposable Soergel modules Theorem
- Minimal positive Rouquier complexes carry the induced Hodge-Riemann signs Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Soergel, Kazhdan-Lusztig-Polynome und unzerlegbare Bimoduln, Satz 6.14(3) and its proof (standard reference, not scraped)
- Elias-Williamson, The Hodge theory of Soergel bimodules, Sections 3.3-3.6, Lemma 3.8 (standard reference, not scraped)