How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Zero-boundary Poincaré inequality on the unit interval
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. For every real ,
Consequently .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice and in the closure of in the norm.
Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure: for every , some satisfies .
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then : a smooth function's increment is the integral of its derivative.
On , Countable Choice gives (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Hence Holder gives and (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
The nonnegative Lebesgue integral is monotone (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
Continuous functions on closed intervals are bounded and Riemann integrable (A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion). Under Countable Choice their Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree (A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral).
Proof
Extend smoothly by zero to . Its derivative is continuous on every with , so [F6] makes it Riemann integrable and identifies its Riemann integral with its Lebesgue integral. Thus [F2] gives ; at both sides are zero. Hence by [F3]. Monotonicity [F5] and give , so .
Given , choose by [F1]. The triangle inequality and step 1.1 give . Since this holds for every positive , . By [F4], squaring and adding the derivative norm proves the estimate.
Depends on
- Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The second fundamental theorem: if $G$ is differentiable on $[a,b]$ with $G' = f$ and $f$ is integrable, then $\int_a^b f = G(b)-G(a)$
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- A continuous function on $[a,b]$ is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
- A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
77 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard S. Laugesen, Linear Analysis and Partial Differential Equations, Chapter 3, Sobolev spaces (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations, Chapter 4, Elliptic PDEs (standard reference, not scraped)