Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Zero-boundary Poincaré inequality on the unit interval

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. For every real v∈H01(0,1),

∥v∥L2(0,1)≤∥v′∥L2(0,1).

Consequently ∥v∥H1(0,1)≤2 ∥v′∥L2(0,1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and v in the closure of Cc∞(0,1) in the H1 norm.

[F1]

Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure: for every ε>0, some φ∈Cc∞(0,1) satisfies ∥v−φ∥H1<ε.

[F3]

On [0,1], Countable Choice gives λ1([0,1])=λ1((0,1))=1 (A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Hence Holder gives ∫01∣g∣≤∥g∥L2 and ∥1∥L2=1 (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).

[F4]

Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms: for k=1,p=2, ∥v∥H12=∥v∥22+∥v′∥22.

[F5]

The nonnegative Lebesgue integral is monotone (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

[F6]

Continuous functions on closed intervals are bounded and Riemann integrable (A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion). Under Countable Choice their Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree (A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral).

Proof

1.1F2F3F5F6givenalgebra

Extend φ∈Cc∞(0,1) smoothly by zero to [0,1]. Its derivative is continuous on every [0,x] with 0<x≤1, so [F6] makes it Riemann integrable and identifies its Riemann integral with its Lebesgue integral. Thus [F2] gives φ(x)=∫0xφ′(t) dt; at x=0 both sides are zero. Hence ∣φ(x)∣≤∫01∣φ′(t)∣ dt≤∥φ′∥2 by [F3]. Monotonicity [F5] and λ1((0,1))=1 give ∥φ∥22=∫01∣φ∣2≤∥φ′∥22, so ∥φ∥2≤∥φ′∥2.

2.1F1F4step 1.1algebra∎

Given ε>0, choose φ by [F1]. The triangle inequality and step 1.1 give ∥v∥2≤∥φ∥2+ε≤∥φ′∥2+ε≤∥v′∥2+2ε. Since this holds for every positive ε, ∥v∥2≤∥v′∥2. By [F4], squaring and adding the derivative norm proves the H1 estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

77 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources