How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Parameter-dependent ODE flows have the variational tangent on a common tube
Statement
Let , let and be open, and let be continuously differentiable. Let be open and be . For , assume that for every the unique solution of , , exists on ; for , instead define . Assume there is a bounded convex open set with compact closure in containing all triples . Then is as a map to . For any and , its tangent matrix is the unique solution of For , evaluation identifies with and the parameter derivative is ; no time derivative or differential-equation solution on the singleton is asserted. The result is local to the stated common compact tube and claims no differentiability outside it.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The open domain, field, parameter neighborhood, initial map, common bounded convex tube with compact closure in , and the stated IVP solutions for or initial-evaluation curves for .
A first-order IVP solution satisfies its Volterra equation (A first-order initial value problem is equivalent to its Volterra integral equation).
A uniform bound on the derivative over a convex open set gives the corresponding Lipschitz bound (On a convex open set, a uniform bound implies ).
If for nonnegative continuous , then (Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients).
The norm of a vector-valued integral is at most the integral of its norm (For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable).
A continuous coefficient matrix on a compact interval gives a unique global solution of its linear matrix IVP (Linear matrix ODEs have unique global solutions on a fixed interval).
The parameter neighborhood and convex tube ensure all secant segments used below remain in . Continuity of on the compact closure makes bounded and uniformly continuous there.
Proof
If , then is identified with by evaluation at , so is the given map and the initial condition determines its parameter tangent at the only time; this branch asserts no time derivative or IVP on the singleton. If , then , so the state curve and tangent are the unique zero maps. If , the parameter domain has at most one point; its map into has the unique derivative from , and the sensitivity matrix has no columns. In each case the asserted conclusion follows; hence assume and . Let . Differentiability of gives for small . Subtract the Volterra equations [F1] and apply [F2] on the segment between and . Boundedness of on gives Since , [F3] yields .
Put and let be column of . For each parameter coordinate , the augmented vector solves the homogeneous linear system Embed as one column of a square initial matrix, with all other columns zero. The unique linear matrix solution supplied by [F5] has that vector solution as the selected column. Thus the tangent equation has a unique solution for each of the finitely many columns.
Put and , and define . Set and , and let . Uniform continuity of on gives as . If , the set is convex and open and contains both endpoints of the secant. For , its derivative on this set has norm at most . Applying [F2] there gives ; if , then . Step 1.1 gives , so . Also .
Let , and let . The Volterra equations and the field remainder from step 2.1 give , where . By [F4], . Both first terms are by step 2.1 and differentiability of . Applying [F3] yields . Thus the Fréchet derivative at exists and equals .
For any sequence in , step 1.1 gives uniformly, and uniform continuity of on makes the tangent coefficients converge uniformly to . Subtracting the tangent integral equations gives . The initial and coefficient differences tend to zero, while are uniformly bounded; [F3] then gives . Since is arbitrary in , the derivative is continuous throughout that set, so the flow map is .
Depends on
- First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals
- A first-order initial value problem is equivalent to its Volterra integral equation
- On a convex open set, a uniform bound $\|Df(z)v\|_2\le M\|v\|_2$ implies $\|f(y)-f(x)\|_2\le M\|y-x\|_2$
- Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients
- For $a \le b$ and $f : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^m$ integrable when $a<b$, $\bigl\lVert\int_a^b f\bigr\rVert_2 \le \int_a^b \lVert f\rVert_2$; for $a<b$, $\lVert f\rVert_2$ is integrable
- Linear matrix ODEs have unique global solutions on a fixed interval
Used by
- A two-interval shooting residual has a block-bidiagonal sensitivity Jacobian Example
- Differentiated explicit RK stages give local C1 order Lemma
- Local C1 step consistency gives tangent, adjoint and gradient order Lemma
- The continuous ODE adjoint gives the parameter gradient with endpoint terms Theorem
- The saltation matrix gives the first-order variation across a transverse hybrid reset Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William W. Hager, Runge-Kutta methods in optimal control and the transformed adjoint system, §§2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael B. Giles and Niles A. Pierce, An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design, §2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)