How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weak graph limits preserve zero tangential H(curl)
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a bounded open set. Suppose , strongly in , and . Then a subsequence of the curls converges weakly in to , the limit belongs to , and in fact .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the bounded open set ; the distributional graph-space definition; and the sequence in the statement.
Countable Choice is the stated hypothesis of the weak-subsequence supplier. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
is a separable real Hilbert space: the scalar space on a bounded measurable set is separable and Hilbert, and a finite product of separable Hilbert spaces is separable and Hilbert. (L2 controls on a bounded spatial region form a separable Hilbert space, with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space)
Every bounded sequence in a separable real Hilbert space has a weakly convergent subsequence. (A bounded sequence in a separable Hilbert space has a weakly convergent subsequence)
The distributional curl is characterized by for every compactly supported smooth test vector field . (The real H(curl) graph space on a polyhedron)
is a norm-closed linear subspace of the graph Hilbert space, by its closure definition; a closed subspace of a Hilbert space is the orthogonal complement of its orthogonal complement. (Zero tangential trace H(curl) space, Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace)
Proof
Given: The sequence and assumptions in the statement.
The graph of distributional curl is closed in : if and in , [F3] gives for each test , so . By [F1] the product is Hilbert, hence its closed graph is Hilbert with the graph inner product. Thus is a Hilbert space.
The curls are bounded in the separable Hilbert space of [F1]. By [F2] choose a subsequence, still indexed by , with weakly in . For every test , strong convergence of and [F3] give . Therefore distributionally and .
The strong convergence of and weak convergence of their curls show that in the graph Hilbert space: for every , . For every , each ; weak convergence gives . By [F4], .
Depends on
- The real H(curl) graph space on a polyhedron
- Zero tangential trace H(curl) space
- $L^2$ with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space
- L2 controls on a bounded spatial region form a separable Hilbert space
- A bounded sequence in a separable Hilbert space has a weakly convergent subsequence
- Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Long Chen, Finite Element Methods for Maxwell Equations, complete lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)